* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/93] 5.4.289-rc1 review
2025-01-06 15:16 [PATCH 5.4 00/93] 5.4.289-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-01-06 18:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-01-07 12:43 ` Jon Hunter
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2025-01-06 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie
On 1/6/25 07:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.289 release.
> There are 93 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:11:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.289-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/93] 5.4.289-rc1 review
2025-01-06 15:16 [PATCH 5.4 00/93] 5.4.289-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-06 18:58 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2025-01-07 12:43 ` Jon Hunter
2025-01-07 13:50 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-01-07 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Mon, 06 Jan 2025 16:16:36 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.289 release.
> There are 93 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:11:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.289-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.4:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
24 boots: 24 pass, 0 fail
54 tests: 54 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.4.289-rc1-g0578e8d64d90
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/93] 5.4.289-rc1 review
2025-01-06 15:16 [PATCH 5.4 00/93] 5.4.289-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-06 18:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-01-07 12:43 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-01-07 13:50 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-01-07 23:16 ` Shuah Khan
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-01-07 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 21:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.289 release.
> There are 93 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:11:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.289-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.4.289-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 0578e8d64d90f030b54a4ced241ec0b7f53a7c57
* git describe: v5.4.288-94-g0578e8d64d90
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.288-94-g0578e8d64d90
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.287-25-gb66d75b25fae)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.287-25-gb66d75b25fae)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.4.287-25-gb66d75b25fae)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.287-25-gb66d75b25fae)
## Test result summary
total: 42887, pass: 27545, fail: 4176, skip: 11101, xfail: 65
## Build Summary
* arc: 6 total, 5 passed, 1 failed
* arm: 136 total, 136 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 36 total, 34 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 22 total, 16 passed, 6 failed
* mips: 29 total, 27 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 0 passed, 4 failed
* powerpc: 30 total, 28 passed, 2 failed
* riscv: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 12 total, 10 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 7 passed, 1 failed
* x86_64: 32 total, 32 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/93] 5.4.289-rc1 review
2025-01-06 15:16 [PATCH 5.4 00/93] 5.4.289-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-01-07 13:50 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-01-07 23:16 ` Shuah Khan
2025-01-08 13:00 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2025-01-08 14:13 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2025-01-07 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 1/6/25 08:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.289 release.
> There are 93 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:11:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.289-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/93] 5.4.289-rc1 review
2025-01-06 15:16 [PATCH 5.4 00/93] 5.4.289-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-01-07 23:16 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2025-01-08 13:00 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2025-01-09 10:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-08 14:13 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
5 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum @ 2025-01-08 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: Usama.Anjum, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 1/6/25 8:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.289 release.
> There are 93 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:11:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.289-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------
OVERVIEW
Builds: 34 passed, 4 failed
Boot tests: 384 passed, 0 failed
CI systems: broonie, maestro
REVISION
Commit
name: v5.4.288-94-g0578e8d64d90
hash: 0578e8d64d90f030b54a4ced241ec0b7f53a7c57
Checked out from
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
BUILDS
Failures
-arm64 (defconfig)
Build detail: https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/build/build?orgId=1&var-id=broonie:0578e8d64d90f030b54a4ced241ec0b7f53a7c57-arm64-defconfig
CI system: broonie
-arm64 (cros://chromeos-5.4/arm64/chromiumos-qualcomm.flavour.config)
Build detail: https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/build/build?orgId=1&var-id=maestro:677c0e55423acf18d2736a33
Build error: make: *** [arch/arm64/Makefile:170: vdso_prepare] Error 2
-arm64 (defconfig)
Build detail: https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/build/build?orgId=1&var-id=maestro:677c0e9e423acf18d2736b66
Build error: ./arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h:85:50: error: ‘KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SHIFT’ undeclared (first use in this function)
-i386 (i386_defconfig+allmodconfig)
Build detail: https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/build/build?orgId=1&var-id=maestro:677c0ea8423acf18d2736b8c
Build error: arch/x86/events/amd/../perf_event.h:838:21: error: invalid output size for constraint '=q'
CI system: maestro
BOOT TESTS
No boot failure found
See complete and up-to-date report at:
https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/revision/revision?orgId=1&var-git_commit_hash=0578e8d64d90f030b54a4ced241ec0b7f53a7c57&var-patchset_hash=
Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
Thanks,
KernelCI team
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/93] 5.4.289-rc1 review
2025-01-08 13:00 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
@ 2025-01-09 10:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-09 14:10 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-01-09 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 06:00:40PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> On 1/6/25 8:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.289 release.
> > There are 93 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:11:04 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.289-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
> > -------------
> OVERVIEW
>
> Builds: 34 passed, 4 failed
Are these new failures? Or old ones? Knowing this would help out a
lot, thanks.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/93] 5.4.289-rc1 review
2025-01-09 10:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-01-09 14:10 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2025-01-09 14:14 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum @ 2025-01-09 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Usama.Anjum, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 1/9/25 3:12 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 06:00:40PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>> On 1/6/25 8:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.289 release.
>>> There are 93 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:11:04 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.289-rc1.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>>
>>> -------------
>> OVERVIEW
>>
>> Builds: 34 passed, 4 failed
>
> Are these new failures? Or old ones? Knowing this would help out a
> lot, thanks.
>
> greg k-h
>
Looking at build errors in 5.4.288 [1],
> BUILDS
>
> Failures
> -arm64 (defconfig)
> Build detail: https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/build/build?orgId=1&var-id=broonie:0578e8d64d90f030b54a4ced241ec0b7f53a7c57-arm64-defconfig
> CI system: broonie
Let's ignore this as logs aren't present.
>
> -arm64 (cros://chromeos-5.4/arm64/chromiumos-qualcomm.flavour.config)
> Build detail: https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/build/build?orgId=1&var-id=maestro:677c0e55423acf18d2736a33
> Build error: make: *** [arch/arm64/Makefile:170: vdso_prepare] Error 2
> -arm64 (defconfig)
> Build detail: https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/build/build?orgId=1&var-id=maestro:677c0e9e423acf18d2736b66
> Build error: ./arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h:85:50: error: ‘KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SHIFT’ undeclared (first use in this function)
These were also present in 5.4.288. They aren't new.
>
> -i386 (i386_defconfig+allmodconfig)
> Build detail: https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/build/build?orgId=1&var-id=maestro:677c0ea8423acf18d2736b8c
> Build error: arch/x86/events/amd/../perf_event.h:838:21: error: invalid output size for constraint '=q'
> CI system: maestro
This one is the new.
[1] https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/revision/revision?orgId=1&var-git_commit_hash=e0646975af89e712bf6de20c2d372f7bec2d5f94&var-patchset_hash=&from=now-100y&to=now&timezone=browser&var-datasource=edquppk2ghfcwc&var-origin=$__all&var-build_architecture=$__all&var-build_config_name=$__all&var-test_path=boot
--
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/93] 5.4.289-rc1 review
2025-01-09 14:10 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
@ 2025-01-09 14:14 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-01-09 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 545 bytes --]
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 07:10:00PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> On 1/9/25 3:12 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Failures
> > -arm64 (defconfig)
> > Build detail: https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/build/build?orgId=1&var-id=broonie:0578e8d64d90f030b54a4ced241ec0b7f53a7c57-arm64-defconfig
> > CI system: broonie
> Let's ignore this as logs aren't present.
That's the assembler error I've previously reported:
https://builds.sirena.org.uk/0578e8d64d90f030b54a4ced241ec0b7f53a7c57/arm64/defconfig/build.log
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/93] 5.4.289-rc1 review
2025-01-06 15:16 [PATCH 5.4 00/93] 5.4.289-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-01-08 13:00 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
@ 2025-01-08 14:13 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2025-01-08 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, Vegard Nossum, Darren Kenny
Hi Greg,
On 06/01/25 20:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.289 release.
> There are 93 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
No problems seen on x86_64 and aarch64 with our testing.
Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Thanks,
Harshit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread