* [PATCH v2 0/1] loongson: Fix idle VS timer enqueue
@ 2025-02-08 10:19 Marco Crivellari
2025-02-08 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] [PATCH] " Marco Crivellari
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marco Crivellari @ 2025-02-08 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: loongarch, linux-kernel
Cc: Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui, Frederic Weisbecker, Jinyang He,
Marco Crivellari, Tiezhu Yang, Jiaxun Yang, Bibo Mao
This patch aim to fix issues if timers are queued because __arch_cpu_idle()
only checks if TIF_NEED_RESCHED is set before going to sleep.
Changes are described in [1], and [2] improve the patch further.
The following patch is the result of [1] and [2] combined.
Code compiled successfully, but I couldn't test the changes because of some
trouble emulating a loongarch machine; I tried to boot with and without
this patch, but a panic occurred, due likely to a wrong VM configuration
(panic occurred right after the i8042 probing).
- [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230811170049.308866-5-frederic@kernel.org/#t
- [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/06cf8750-901d-2f65-fb9e-81980688e017@loongson.cn/
---
Changes in v2:
- arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S: code improved as suggested by Huacai:
https://lore.kernel.org/loongarch/CAAhV-H6OKwmxhF_iWJEc8OEZ==h8dTdorTwkE8oMUMWAbU6xeg@mail.gmail.com/
- arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c: asm inline inside the while loops
Marco Crivellari (1):
loongson: Fix idle VS timer enqueue
arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c | 3 +--
arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c | 18 +++++++++---------
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/1] [PATCH] loongson: Fix idle VS timer enqueue
2025-02-08 10:19 [PATCH v2 0/1] loongson: Fix idle VS timer enqueue Marco Crivellari
@ 2025-02-08 10:19 ` Marco Crivellari
2025-02-09 19:08 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-10 2:19 ` Huacai Chen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marco Crivellari @ 2025-02-08 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: loongarch, linux-kernel
Cc: Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui, Frederic Weisbecker, Jinyang He,
Marco Crivellari, Tiezhu Yang, Jiaxun Yang, Bibo Mao,
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
Loongson re-enables interrupts on its idle routine and performs a
TIF_NEED_RESCHED check afterwards before putting the CPU to sleep.
The IRQs firing between the check and the idling instruction may set the
TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag. In order to deal with the such a race, IRQs
interrupting __arch_cpu_idle() rollback their return address to the
beginning of __arch_cpu_idle() so that TIF_NEED_RESCHED is checked
again before going back to sleep.
However idle IRQs can also queue timers that may require a tick
reprogramming through a new generic idle loop iteration but those timers
would go unnoticed here because __arch_cpu_idle() only checks
TIF_NEED_RESCHED. It doesn't check for pending timers.
Fix this with fast-forwarding idle IRQs return value to the end of the
idle routine instead of the beginning, so that the generic idle loop
handles both TIF_NEED_RESCHED and pending timers.
Fixes: 0603839b18f4 ("LoongArch: Add exception/interrupt handling")
Cc: WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
---
arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c | 3 +--
arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c | 18 +++++++++---------
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S b/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S
index 86d5d90ebefe..9623298a5cf1 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S
@@ -18,28 +18,31 @@
.align 5
SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_cpu_idle)
- /* start of rollback region */
- LONG_L t0, tp, TI_FLAGS
- nop
- andi t0, t0, _TIF_NEED_RESCHED
- bnez t0, 1f
- nop
- nop
- nop
+ /* start of idle interrupt region */
+ ori t0, zero, CSR_CRMD_IE
+ /* idle instruction needs irq enabled */
+ csrxchg t0, t0, LOONGARCH_CSR_CRMD
+ /*
+ * If an interrupt lands here; between enabling interrupts above and
+ * going idle on the next instruction, we must *NOT* go idle since the
+ * interrupt could have set TIF_NEED_RESCHED or caused an timer to need
+ * reprogramming. Fall through -- see handle_vint() below -- and have
+ * the idle loop take care of things.
+ */
idle 0
- /* end of rollback region */
-1: jr ra
+ /* end of idle interrupt region */
+SYM_INNER_LABEL(__arch_cpu_idle_exit, SYM_L_LOCAL)
+ jr ra
SYM_FUNC_END(__arch_cpu_idle)
SYM_CODE_START(handle_vint)
UNWIND_HINT_UNDEFINED
BACKUP_T0T1
SAVE_ALL
- la_abs t1, __arch_cpu_idle
+ la_abs t1, __arch_cpu_idle_exit
LONG_L t0, sp, PT_ERA
- /* 32 byte rollback region */
- ori t0, t0, 0x1f
- xori t0, t0, 0x1f
+ /* 3 instructions idle interrupt region */
+ ori t0, t0, 0x0c
bne t0, t1, 1f
LONG_S t0, sp, PT_ERA
1: move a0, sp
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c
index 0b5dd2faeb90..54b247d8cdb6 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
void __cpuidle arch_cpu_idle(void)
{
- raw_local_irq_enable();
- __arch_cpu_idle(); /* idle instruction needs irq enabled */
+ __arch_cpu_idle();
raw_local_irq_disable();
}
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c
index 1ef8c6383535..8fd8c44b02cb 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c
@@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ void machine_halt(void)
pr_notice("\n\n** You can safely turn off the power now **\n\n");
console_flush_on_panic(CONSOLE_FLUSH_PENDING);
- while (true) {
- __arch_cpu_idle();
- }
+ while (1) {
+ asm volatile("idle 0" : : : "memory");
+ };
}
void machine_power_off(void)
@@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ void machine_power_off(void)
efi.reset_system(EFI_RESET_SHUTDOWN, EFI_SUCCESS, 0, NULL);
#endif
- while (true) {
- __arch_cpu_idle();
- }
+ while (1) {
+ asm volatile("idle 0" : : : "memory");
+ };
}
void machine_restart(char *command)
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ void machine_restart(char *command)
if (!acpi_disabled)
acpi_reboot();
- while (true) {
- __arch_cpu_idle();
- }
+ while (1) {
+ asm volatile("idle 0" : : : "memory");
+ };
}
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] [PATCH] loongson: Fix idle VS timer enqueue
2025-02-08 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] [PATCH] " Marco Crivellari
@ 2025-02-09 19:08 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-10 2:19 ` Huacai Chen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-02-09 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marco Crivellari, loongarch, linux-kernel
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui, Frederic Weisbecker,
Jinyang He, Marco Crivellari, Tiezhu Yang, Jiaxun Yang, Bibo Mao,
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
Hi Marco,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v6.14-rc1 next-20250207]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Marco-Crivellari/loongson-Fix-idle-VS-timer-enqueue/20250208-182213
base: linus/master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250208101924.20743-2-marco.crivellari%40suse.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] [PATCH] loongson: Fix idle VS timer enqueue
config: loongarch-randconfig-r054-20250209 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250210/202502100258.jJThV6DP-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502100258.jJThV6DP-lkp@intel.com/
cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c:37:2-3: Unneeded semicolon
arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c:57:2-3: Unneeded semicolon
arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c:78:2-3: Unneeded semicolon
vim +37 arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c
22
23 void machine_halt(void)
24 {
25 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
26 preempt_disable();
27 smp_send_stop();
28 #endif
29 local_irq_disable();
30 clear_csr_ecfg(ECFG0_IM);
31
32 pr_notice("\n\n** You can safely turn off the power now **\n\n");
33 console_flush_on_panic(CONSOLE_FLUSH_PENDING);
34
35 while (1) {
36 asm volatile("idle 0" : : : "memory");
> 37 };
38 }
39
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] [PATCH] loongson: Fix idle VS timer enqueue
2025-02-08 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] [PATCH] " Marco Crivellari
2025-02-09 19:08 ` kernel test robot
@ 2025-02-10 2:19 ` Huacai Chen
2025-02-10 8:27 ` Marco Crivellari
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Huacai Chen @ 2025-02-10 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marco Crivellari
Cc: loongarch, linux-kernel, WANG Xuerui, Frederic Weisbecker,
Jinyang He, Tiezhu Yang, Jiaxun Yang, Bibo Mao,
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
Hi, Marco,
Don't care about the lkp robot, I have queued this patch with some
small modifications.
https://github.com/chenhuacai/linux/commit/a8aa673ea46c03b3f62992ffa4ffe810ac84f6e3
Huacai
On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 6:19 PM Marco Crivellari
<marco.crivellari@suse.com> wrote:
>
> Loongson re-enables interrupts on its idle routine and performs a
> TIF_NEED_RESCHED check afterwards before putting the CPU to sleep.
>
> The IRQs firing between the check and the idling instruction may set the
> TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag. In order to deal with the such a race, IRQs
> interrupting __arch_cpu_idle() rollback their return address to the
> beginning of __arch_cpu_idle() so that TIF_NEED_RESCHED is checked
> again before going back to sleep.
>
> However idle IRQs can also queue timers that may require a tick
> reprogramming through a new generic idle loop iteration but those timers
> would go unnoticed here because __arch_cpu_idle() only checks
> TIF_NEED_RESCHED. It doesn't check for pending timers.
>
> Fix this with fast-forwarding idle IRQs return value to the end of the
> idle routine instead of the beginning, so that the generic idle loop
> handles both TIF_NEED_RESCHED and pending timers.
>
> Fixes: 0603839b18f4 ("LoongArch: Add exception/interrupt handling")
> Cc: WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
> ---
> arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
> arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c | 3 +--
> arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S b/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S
> index 86d5d90ebefe..9623298a5cf1 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S
> @@ -18,28 +18,31 @@
>
> .align 5
> SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_cpu_idle)
> - /* start of rollback region */
> - LONG_L t0, tp, TI_FLAGS
> - nop
> - andi t0, t0, _TIF_NEED_RESCHED
> - bnez t0, 1f
> - nop
> - nop
> - nop
> + /* start of idle interrupt region */
> + ori t0, zero, CSR_CRMD_IE
> + /* idle instruction needs irq enabled */
> + csrxchg t0, t0, LOONGARCH_CSR_CRMD
> + /*
> + * If an interrupt lands here; between enabling interrupts above and
> + * going idle on the next instruction, we must *NOT* go idle since the
> + * interrupt could have set TIF_NEED_RESCHED or caused an timer to need
> + * reprogramming. Fall through -- see handle_vint() below -- and have
> + * the idle loop take care of things.
> + */
> idle 0
> - /* end of rollback region */
> -1: jr ra
> + /* end of idle interrupt region */
> +SYM_INNER_LABEL(__arch_cpu_idle_exit, SYM_L_LOCAL)
> + jr ra
> SYM_FUNC_END(__arch_cpu_idle)
>
> SYM_CODE_START(handle_vint)
> UNWIND_HINT_UNDEFINED
> BACKUP_T0T1
> SAVE_ALL
> - la_abs t1, __arch_cpu_idle
> + la_abs t1, __arch_cpu_idle_exit
> LONG_L t0, sp, PT_ERA
> - /* 32 byte rollback region */
> - ori t0, t0, 0x1f
> - xori t0, t0, 0x1f
> + /* 3 instructions idle interrupt region */
> + ori t0, t0, 0x0c
> bne t0, t1, 1f
> LONG_S t0, sp, PT_ERA
> 1: move a0, sp
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c
> index 0b5dd2faeb90..54b247d8cdb6 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c
> @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
>
> void __cpuidle arch_cpu_idle(void)
> {
> - raw_local_irq_enable();
> - __arch_cpu_idle(); /* idle instruction needs irq enabled */
> + __arch_cpu_idle();
> raw_local_irq_disable();
> }
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c
> index 1ef8c6383535..8fd8c44b02cb 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c
> @@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ void machine_halt(void)
> pr_notice("\n\n** You can safely turn off the power now **\n\n");
> console_flush_on_panic(CONSOLE_FLUSH_PENDING);
>
> - while (true) {
> - __arch_cpu_idle();
> - }
> + while (1) {
> + asm volatile("idle 0" : : : "memory");
> + };
> }
>
> void machine_power_off(void)
> @@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ void machine_power_off(void)
> efi.reset_system(EFI_RESET_SHUTDOWN, EFI_SUCCESS, 0, NULL);
> #endif
>
> - while (true) {
> - __arch_cpu_idle();
> - }
> + while (1) {
> + asm volatile("idle 0" : : : "memory");
> + };
> }
>
> void machine_restart(char *command)
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ void machine_restart(char *command)
> if (!acpi_disabled)
> acpi_reboot();
>
> - while (true) {
> - __arch_cpu_idle();
> - }
> + while (1) {
> + asm volatile("idle 0" : : : "memory");
> + };
> }
> --
> 2.48.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] [PATCH] loongson: Fix idle VS timer enqueue
2025-02-10 2:19 ` Huacai Chen
@ 2025-02-10 8:27 ` Marco Crivellari
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marco Crivellari @ 2025-02-10 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huacai Chen
Cc: loongarch, linux-kernel, WANG Xuerui, Frederic Weisbecker,
Jinyang He, Tiezhu Yang, Jiaxun Yang, Bibo Mao,
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
Hi Huacai,
Thanks a lot, I will keep that in mind!
That's very kind of you, sorry for the trouble.
Marco
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 3:19 AM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi, Marco,
>
> Don't care about the lkp robot, I have queued this patch with some
> small modifications.
> https://github.com/chenhuacai/linux/commit/a8aa673ea46c03b3f62992ffa4ffe810ac84f6e3
>
> Huacai
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 6:19 PM Marco Crivellari
> <marco.crivellari@suse.com> wrote:
> >
> > Loongson re-enables interrupts on its idle routine and performs a
> > TIF_NEED_RESCHED check afterwards before putting the CPU to sleep.
> >
> > The IRQs firing between the check and the idling instruction may set the
> > TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag. In order to deal with the such a race, IRQs
> > interrupting __arch_cpu_idle() rollback their return address to the
> > beginning of __arch_cpu_idle() so that TIF_NEED_RESCHED is checked
> > again before going back to sleep.
> >
> > However idle IRQs can also queue timers that may require a tick
> > reprogramming through a new generic idle loop iteration but those timers
> > would go unnoticed here because __arch_cpu_idle() only checks
> > TIF_NEED_RESCHED. It doesn't check for pending timers.
> >
> > Fix this with fast-forwarding idle IRQs return value to the end of the
> > idle routine instead of the beginning, so that the generic idle loop
> > handles both TIF_NEED_RESCHED and pending timers.
> >
> > Fixes: 0603839b18f4 ("LoongArch: Add exception/interrupt handling")
> > Cc: WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
> > ---
> > arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
> > arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c | 3 +--
> > arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S b/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S
> > index 86d5d90ebefe..9623298a5cf1 100644
> > --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S
> > +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S
> > @@ -18,28 +18,31 @@
> >
> > .align 5
> > SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_cpu_idle)
> > - /* start of rollback region */
> > - LONG_L t0, tp, TI_FLAGS
> > - nop
> > - andi t0, t0, _TIF_NEED_RESCHED
> > - bnez t0, 1f
> > - nop
> > - nop
> > - nop
> > + /* start of idle interrupt region */
> > + ori t0, zero, CSR_CRMD_IE
> > + /* idle instruction needs irq enabled */
> > + csrxchg t0, t0, LOONGARCH_CSR_CRMD
> > + /*
> > + * If an interrupt lands here; between enabling interrupts above and
> > + * going idle on the next instruction, we must *NOT* go idle since the
> > + * interrupt could have set TIF_NEED_RESCHED or caused an timer to need
> > + * reprogramming. Fall through -- see handle_vint() below -- and have
> > + * the idle loop take care of things.
> > + */
> > idle 0
> > - /* end of rollback region */
> > -1: jr ra
> > + /* end of idle interrupt region */
> > +SYM_INNER_LABEL(__arch_cpu_idle_exit, SYM_L_LOCAL)
> > + jr ra
> > SYM_FUNC_END(__arch_cpu_idle)
> >
> > SYM_CODE_START(handle_vint)
> > UNWIND_HINT_UNDEFINED
> > BACKUP_T0T1
> > SAVE_ALL
> > - la_abs t1, __arch_cpu_idle
> > + la_abs t1, __arch_cpu_idle_exit
> > LONG_L t0, sp, PT_ERA
> > - /* 32 byte rollback region */
> > - ori t0, t0, 0x1f
> > - xori t0, t0, 0x1f
> > + /* 3 instructions idle interrupt region */
> > + ori t0, t0, 0x0c
> > bne t0, t1, 1f
> > LONG_S t0, sp, PT_ERA
> > 1: move a0, sp
> > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c
> > index 0b5dd2faeb90..54b247d8cdb6 100644
> > --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c
> > +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c
> > @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
> >
> > void __cpuidle arch_cpu_idle(void)
> > {
> > - raw_local_irq_enable();
> > - __arch_cpu_idle(); /* idle instruction needs irq enabled */
> > + __arch_cpu_idle();
> > raw_local_irq_disable();
> > }
> > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c
> > index 1ef8c6383535..8fd8c44b02cb 100644
> > --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c
> > +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/reset.c
> > @@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ void machine_halt(void)
> > pr_notice("\n\n** You can safely turn off the power now **\n\n");
> > console_flush_on_panic(CONSOLE_FLUSH_PENDING);
> >
> > - while (true) {
> > - __arch_cpu_idle();
> > - }
> > + while (1) {
> > + asm volatile("idle 0" : : : "memory");
> > + };
> > }
> >
> > void machine_power_off(void)
> > @@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ void machine_power_off(void)
> > efi.reset_system(EFI_RESET_SHUTDOWN, EFI_SUCCESS, 0, NULL);
> > #endif
> >
> > - while (true) {
> > - __arch_cpu_idle();
> > - }
> > + while (1) {
> > + asm volatile("idle 0" : : : "memory");
> > + };
> > }
> >
> > void machine_restart(char *command)
> > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ void machine_restart(char *command)
> > if (!acpi_disabled)
> > acpi_reboot();
> >
> > - while (true) {
> > - __arch_cpu_idle();
> > - }
> > + while (1) {
> > + asm volatile("idle 0" : : : "memory");
> > + };
> > }
> > --
> > 2.48.1
> >
--
Marco Crivellari
L3 Support Engineer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-10 8:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-08 10:19 [PATCH v2 0/1] loongson: Fix idle VS timer enqueue Marco Crivellari
2025-02-08 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] [PATCH] " Marco Crivellari
2025-02-09 19:08 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-10 2:19 ` Huacai Chen
2025-02-10 8:27 ` Marco Crivellari
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox