From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
"Nirmal Patel" <nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com>,
"Jonathan Derrick" <jonathan.derrick@linux.dev>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] vmd: disable MSI remapping bypass under Xen
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 11:23:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250214172324.GA157438@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250114103315.51328-3-roger.pau@citrix.com>
The subject line convention for this file is:
PCI: vmd: Disable MSI remapping ...
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:33:12AM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> MSI remapping bypass (directly configuring MSI entries for devices on the
> VMD bus) won't work under Xen, as Xen is not aware of devices in such bus,
> and hence cannot configure the entries using the pIRQ interface in the PV
> case, and in the PVH case traps won't be setup for MSI entries for such
> devices.
>
> Until Xen is aware of devices in the VMD bus prevent the
> VMD_FEAT_CAN_BYPASS_MSI_REMAP capability from being used when running as
> any kind of Xen guest.
>
> The MSI remapping bypass is an optional feature of VMD bridges, and hence
> when running under Xen it will be masked and devices will be forced to
> redirect its interrupts from the VMD bridge. That mode of operation must
> always be supported by VMD bridges and works when Xen is not aware of
> devices behind the VMD bridge.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Add xen header.
> - Expand comment.
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> index 264a180403a0..33c9514bd926 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
> #include <linux/rculist.h>
> #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
>
> +#include <xen/xen.h>
> +
> #include <asm/irqdomain.h>
>
> #define VMD_CFGBAR 0
> @@ -965,6 +967,23 @@ static int vmd_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> struct vmd_dev *vmd;
> int err;
>
> + if (xen_domain())
> + /*
> + * Xen doesn't have knowledge about devices in the VMD bus
> + * because the config space of devices behind the VMD bridge is
> + * not known to Xen, and hence Xen cannot discover or configure
> + * them in any way.
> + *
> + * Bypass of MSI remapping won't work in that case as direct
> + * write by Linux to the MSI entries won't result in functional
> + * interrupts, as it's Xen the entity that manages the host
"... as Xen is the entity that ..." ?
> + * interrupt controller and must configure interrupts.
> + * However multiplexing of interrupts by the VMD bridge will
> + * work under Xen, so force the usage of that mode which must
> + * always be supported by VMD bridges.
> + */
> + features &= ~VMD_FEAT_CAN_BYPASS_MSI_REMAP;
Since the comment is so long, I would add braces even though it's only
a single statement. Or maybe moving the comment above the "if" would
make more sense.
> if (resource_size(&dev->resource[VMD_CFGBAR]) < (1 << 20))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> --
> 2.46.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-14 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-14 10:33 [PATCH v2 0/3] xen: fix usage of devices behind a VMD bridge Roger Pau Monne
2025-01-14 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] xen/pci: do not register devices with segments >= 0x10000 Roger Pau Monne
2025-02-14 17:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-14 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] vmd: disable MSI remapping bypass under Xen Roger Pau Monne
2025-02-14 17:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-01-14 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] pci/msi: remove pci_msi_ignore_mask Roger Pau Monne
2025-02-05 15:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-06 8:33 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-02-06 16:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-14 11:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-05 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] xen: fix usage of devices behind a VMD bridge Roger Pau Monné
2025-02-14 17:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-14 18:46 ` Jürgen Groß
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250214172324.GA157438@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jonathan.derrick@linux.dev \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox