Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] xen: fix usage of devices behind a VMD bridge

["Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1653 bytes --]

On 14.02.25 18:17, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+to Juergen, Nirmal, +cc Jonathan]
> 
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:33:10AM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The following series should fix the usage of devices behind a VMD bridge
>> when running Linux as a Xen PV hardware domain (dom0).  I've only been
>> able to test PV. I think PVH should also work but I don't have hardware
>> capable of testing it right now.
>>
>> I don't expect the first two patches to be problematic, the last patch
>> is likely to be more controversial.  I've tested it internally and
>> didn't see any issues, but my testing of PV mode is mostly limited to
>> dom0.
>>
>> Thanks, Roger.
>>
>> Roger Pau Monne (3):
>>    xen/pci: do not register devices with segments >= 0x10000
>>    vmd: disable MSI remapping bypass under Xen
>>    pci/msi: remove pci_msi_ignore_mask
>>
>>   arch/x86/pci/xen.c           |  8 ++------
>>   drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/pci/msi/msi.c        | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>   drivers/xen/pci.c            | 19 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/linux/msi.h          |  3 ++-
>>   kernel/irq/msi.c             |  2 +-
>>   6 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> We got an ack from Thomas, so I'm fine with this from a PCI
> perspective.  How should it be merged?  Via Xen or PCI?  I'm happy to
> merge via PCI, but would also want acks from Juergen for the Xen
> piece and Nirmal for the VMD piece.

I'm fine with this to go in via the PCI tree.

For the Xen related parts:

Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>


Juergen

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3743 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]