From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>,
Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v15 6/7] sched: Fix proxy/current (push,pull)ability
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 15:07:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250317140754.GD36386@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250312221147.1865364-7-jstultz@google.com>
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 03:11:36PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index b4f7b14f62a24..3596244f613f8 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -6722,6 +6722,23 @@ find_proxy_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *donor, struct rq_flags *rf)
> }
> #endif /* SCHED_PROXY_EXEC */
>
> +static inline void proxy_tag_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *owner)
> +{
> + if (!sched_proxy_exec())
> + return;
> + /*
> + * pick_next_task() calls set_next_task() on the chosen task
> + * at some point, which ensures it is not push/pullable.
> + * However, the chosen/donor task *and* the mutex owner form an
> + * atomic pair wrt push/pull.
> + *
> + * Make sure owner we run is not pushable. Unfortunately we can
> + * only deal with that by means of a dequeue/enqueue cycle. :-/
> + */
> + dequeue_task(rq, owner, DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK | DEQUEUE_SAVE);
> + enqueue_task(rq, owner, ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK | ENQUEUE_RESTORE);
> +}
So this is probably fine at this point; but we should eventually look at
fixing this.
We can probably look at (ab)using sched_class::set_cpus_allowed() for
this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-17 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-12 22:11 [RFC PATCH v15 0/7] Single RunQueue Proxy Execution (v15) John Stultz
2025-03-12 22:11 ` [RFC PATCH v15 1/7] sched: Add CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC & boot argument to enable/disable John Stultz
2025-03-13 10:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-03-14 0:48 ` John Stultz
2025-03-17 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-17 14:44 ` John Stultz
2025-03-17 14:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-12 22:11 ` [RFC PATCH v15 2/7] locking/mutex: Rework task_struct::blocked_on John Stultz
2025-03-13 10:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-03-14 6:12 ` John Stultz
2025-03-16 16:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-03-18 14:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-03-18 15:33 ` Lance Yang
2025-03-19 9:49 ` John Stultz
2025-03-19 12:05 ` Lance Yang
2025-03-19 8:54 ` John Stultz
2025-03-17 11:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-12 22:11 ` [RFC PATCH v15 3/7] locking/mutex: Add p->blocked_on wrappers for correctness checks John Stultz
2025-03-12 22:11 ` [RFC PATCH v15 4/7] sched: Fix runtime accounting w/ split exec & sched contexts John Stultz
2025-03-13 10:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-03-15 6:05 ` John Stultz
2025-03-13 17:24 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-12 22:11 ` [RFC PATCH v15 5/7] sched: Add an initial sketch of the find_proxy_task() function John Stultz
2025-03-15 16:35 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-17 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-12 22:11 ` [RFC PATCH v15 6/7] sched: Fix proxy/current (push,pull)ability John Stultz
2025-03-14 8:40 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-15 5:10 ` John Stultz
2025-03-15 16:06 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-17 14:07 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-03-28 4:45 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-12 22:11 ` [RFC PATCH v15 7/7] sched: Start blocked_on chain processing in find_proxy_task() John Stultz
2025-03-17 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-18 6:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-17 16:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-17 16:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250317140754.GD36386@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Metin.Kaya@arm.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=connoro@google.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
--cc=zezeozue@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox