public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>,
	Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v15 7/7] sched: Start blocked_on chain processing in find_proxy_task()
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:49:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250317164947.GD6888@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250312221147.1865364-8-jstultz@google.com>

On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 03:11:37PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:

> @@ -2950,8 +2951,15 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flag
>  	struct set_affinity_pending my_pending = { }, *pending = NULL;
>  	bool stop_pending, complete = false;
>  
> -	/* Can the task run on the task's current CPU? If so, we're done */
> -	if (cpumask_test_cpu(task_cpu(p), &p->cpus_mask)) {
> +	/*
> +	 * Can the task run on the task's current CPU? If so, we're done
> +	 *
> +	 * We are also done if the task is the current donor, boosting a lock-
> +	 * holding proxy, (and potentially has been migrated outside its
> +	 * current or previous affinity mask)
> +	 */
> +	if (cpumask_test_cpu(task_cpu(p), &p->cpus_mask) ||
> +	    (task_current_donor(rq, p) && !task_current(rq, p))) {
>  		struct task_struct *push_task = NULL;
>  
>  		if ((flags & SCA_MIGRATE_ENABLE) &&

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index f8ad3a44b3771..091f1a01b3327 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9385,6 +9385,7 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
>  	 * 3) cannot be migrated to this CPU due to cpus_ptr, or
>  	 * 4) running (obviously), or
>  	 * 5) are cache-hot on their current CPU.
> +	 * 6) are blocked on mutexes (if SCHED_PROXY_EXEC is enabled)
>  	 */
>  	if ((p->se.sched_delayed) && (env->migration_type != migrate_load))
>  		return 0;
> @@ -9406,6 +9407,9 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
>  	if (kthread_is_per_cpu(p))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	if (task_is_blocked(p))
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(env->dst_cpu, p->cpus_ptr)) {
>  		int cpu;
>  
> @@ -9442,7 +9446,8 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
>  	/* Record that we found at least one task that could run on dst_cpu */
>  	env->flags &= ~LBF_ALL_PINNED;
>  
> -	if (task_on_cpu(env->src_rq, p)) {
> +	if (task_on_cpu(env->src_rq, p) ||
> +	    task_current_donor(env->src_rq, p)) {
>  		schedstat_inc(p->stats.nr_failed_migrations_running);
>  		return 0;
>  	}


Somehow this and the previous patches that touched upon this made me
think that perhaps we can share with migrate_disable(). Specifically, we
seem to be adding those donor checks and hooks to exactly those
locations.

I've not actually tried though.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-17 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-12 22:11 [RFC PATCH v15 0/7] Single RunQueue Proxy Execution (v15) John Stultz
2025-03-12 22:11 ` [RFC PATCH v15 1/7] sched: Add CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC & boot argument to enable/disable John Stultz
2025-03-13 10:09   ` Steven Rostedt
2025-03-14  0:48     ` John Stultz
2025-03-17 14:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-17 14:44     ` John Stultz
2025-03-17 14:50       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-12 22:11 ` [RFC PATCH v15 2/7] locking/mutex: Rework task_struct::blocked_on John Stultz
2025-03-13 10:13   ` Steven Rostedt
2025-03-14  6:12     ` John Stultz
2025-03-16 16:33       ` Steven Rostedt
2025-03-18 14:11       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-03-18 15:33         ` Lance Yang
2025-03-19  9:49           ` John Stultz
2025-03-19 12:05             ` Lance Yang
2025-03-19  8:54         ` John Stultz
2025-03-17 11:44     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-12 22:11 ` [RFC PATCH v15 3/7] locking/mutex: Add p->blocked_on wrappers for correctness checks John Stultz
2025-03-12 22:11 ` [RFC PATCH v15 4/7] sched: Fix runtime accounting w/ split exec & sched contexts John Stultz
2025-03-13 10:26   ` Steven Rostedt
2025-03-15  6:05     ` John Stultz
2025-03-13 17:24   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-12 22:11 ` [RFC PATCH v15 5/7] sched: Add an initial sketch of the find_proxy_task() function John Stultz
2025-03-15 16:35   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-17 13:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-12 22:11 ` [RFC PATCH v15 6/7] sched: Fix proxy/current (push,pull)ability John Stultz
2025-03-14  8:40   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-15  5:10     ` John Stultz
2025-03-15 16:06       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-17 14:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-28  4:45     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-12 22:11 ` [RFC PATCH v15 7/7] sched: Start blocked_on chain processing in find_proxy_task() John Stultz
2025-03-17 16:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-18  6:09     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-17 16:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-17 16:49   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250317164947.GD6888@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Metin.Kaya@arm.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=connoro@google.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=suleiman@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
    --cc=zezeozue@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox