public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/6] i2c: core: Unify the firmware node type check
Date: Mon,  7 Apr 2025 12:55:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250407095852.215809-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250407095852.215809-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

OF and ACPI currently are using asymmetrical APIs to check
for the firmware node type. Unify them by using is_*_node()
against struct fwnode_handle pointer.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c  | 14 ++++++++------
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c | 11 +++++++----
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
index c14ffd6190d3..edab56e5d5e5 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
@@ -490,6 +490,7 @@ static int i2c_smbus_host_notify_to_irq(const struct i2c_client *client)
 
 static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
 {
+	struct fwnode_handle	*fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev);
 	struct i2c_client	*client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
 	struct i2c_driver	*driver;
 	bool do_power_on;
@@ -508,11 +509,11 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
 			/* Keep adapter active when Host Notify is required */
 			pm_runtime_get_sync(&client->adapter->dev);
 			irq = i2c_smbus_host_notify_to_irq(client);
-		} else if (dev->of_node) {
+		} else if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
 			irq = of_irq_get_byname(dev->of_node, "irq");
 			if (irq == -EINVAL || irq == -ENODATA)
 				irq = of_irq_get(dev->of_node, 0);
-		} else if (ACPI_COMPANION(dev)) {
+		} else if (is_acpi_device_node(fwnode)) {
 			bool wake_capable;
 
 			irq = i2c_acpi_get_irq(client, &wake_capable);
@@ -1054,15 +1055,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_new_client_device);
  */
 void i2c_unregister_device(struct i2c_client *client)
 {
+	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
+
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(client))
 		return;
 
-	if (client->dev.of_node) {
+	fwnode = dev_fwnode(&client->dev);
+	if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
 		of_node_clear_flag(client->dev.of_node, OF_POPULATED);
 		of_node_put(client->dev.of_node);
-	}
-
-	if (ACPI_COMPANION(&client->dev))
+	} else if (is_acpi_device_node(fwnode))
 		acpi_device_clear_enumerated(ACPI_COMPANION(&client->dev));
 
 	device_remove_software_node(&client->dev);
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c
index faefe1dfa8e5..3c5cb61b8c39 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/i2c.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
 
 #include "i2c-core.h"
 
@@ -108,15 +109,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_slave_event);
  */
 bool i2c_detect_slave_mode(struct device *dev)
 {
-	if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) {
+	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev);
+
+	if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
 		u32 reg;
 
-		for_each_child_of_node_scoped(dev->of_node, child) {
-			of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &reg);
+		for_each_child_node_scoped(fwnode, child) {
+			fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &reg);
 			if (reg & I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS)
 				return true;
 		}
-	} else if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_ACPI) && ACPI_HANDLE(dev)) {
+	} else if (is_acpi_device_node(fwnode)) {
 		dev_dbg(dev, "ACPI slave is not supported yet\n");
 	}
 	return false;
-- 
2.47.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-07  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-07  9:55 [PATCH v2 0/6] i2c: core: Move client towards fwnode Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07  9:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] i2c: core: Drop duplicate check before calling OF APIs Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07  9:55 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-04-07 12:45   ` [PATCH v2 2/6] i2c: core: Unify the firmware node type check kernel test robot
2025-04-07 13:48     ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 13:47   ` kernel test robot
2025-04-07  9:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] i2c: core: Switch to fwnode APIs to get IRQ Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 13:47   ` kernel test robot
2025-04-07  9:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] i2c: core: Reuse fwnode variable where it makes sense Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07  9:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] i2c: core: Do not dereference fwnode in struct device Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07  9:55 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] i2c: core: Deprecate of_node in struct i2c_board_info Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] i2c: core: Move client towards fwnode Tomi Valkeinen
2025-04-07 12:23   ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250407095852.215809-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox