From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa-dev@sang-engineering.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] i2c: core: Unify the firmware node type check
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 21:47:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202504072133.J8njROAD-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250407095852.215809-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Hi Andy,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on wsa/i2c/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.15-rc1 next-20250407]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andy-Shevchenko/i2c-core-Drop-duplicate-check-before-calling-OF-APIs/20250407-180528
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250407095852.215809-3-andriy.shevchenko%40linux.intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/6] i2c: core: Unify the firmware node type check
config: arm-randconfig-002-20250407 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250407/202504072133.J8njROAD-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 21.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 92c93f5286b9ff33f27ff694d2dc33da1c07afdd)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250407/202504072133.J8njROAD-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202504072133.J8njROAD-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c:117:3: error: call to undeclared function 'for_each_child_node_scoped'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
117 | for_each_child_node_scoped(fwnode, child) {
| ^
>> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c:117:44: error: expected ';' after expression
117 | for_each_child_node_scoped(fwnode, child) {
| ^
| ;
>> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c:117:38: error: use of undeclared identifier 'child'; did you mean 'ihold'?
117 | for_each_child_node_scoped(fwnode, child) {
| ^~~~~
| ihold
include/linux/fs.h:2758:13: note: 'ihold' declared here
2758 | extern void ihold(struct inode * inode);
| ^
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c:118:29: error: use of undeclared identifier 'child'; did you mean 'ihold'?
118 | fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", ®);
| ^~~~~
| ihold
include/linux/fs.h:2758:13: note: 'ihold' declared here
2758 | extern void ihold(struct inode * inode);
| ^
4 errors generated.
vim +/for_each_child_node_scoped +117 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c
97
98 /**
99 * i2c_detect_slave_mode - detect operation mode
100 * @dev: The device owning the bus
101 *
102 * This checks the device nodes for an I2C slave by checking the address
103 * used in the reg property. If the address match the I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS
104 * flag this means the device is configured to act as a I2C slave and it will
105 * be listening at that address.
106 *
107 * Returns true if an I2C own slave address is detected, otherwise returns
108 * false.
109 */
110 bool i2c_detect_slave_mode(struct device *dev)
111 {
112 struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev);
113
114 if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
115 u32 reg;
116
> 117 for_each_child_node_scoped(fwnode, child) {
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-07 9:55 [PATCH v2 0/6] i2c: core: Move client towards fwnode Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] i2c: core: Drop duplicate check before calling OF APIs Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] i2c: core: Unify the firmware node type check Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 12:45 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-07 13:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 13:47 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-04-07 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] i2c: core: Switch to fwnode APIs to get IRQ Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 13:47 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-07 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] i2c: core: Reuse fwnode variable where it makes sense Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] i2c: core: Do not dereference fwnode in struct device Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] i2c: core: Deprecate of_node in struct i2c_board_info Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] i2c: core: Move client towards fwnode Tomi Valkeinen
2025-04-07 12:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202504072133.J8njROAD-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=wsa-dev@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox