* [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: Use of_property_present() to test property presence
@ 2025-04-08 19:02 Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-04-10 17:29 ` Jeff Johnson
2025-04-12 4:24 ` Jeff Johnson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring (Arm) @ 2025-04-08 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Johnson; +Cc: linux-wireless, ath11k, linux-kernel
The use of of_property_read_u32() isn't really correct as
"memory-region" contains phandles (though those happen to be u32s. As
it is just testing for property presence, use of_property_present()
instead.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
---
I'm assuming this should still go to linux-wireless list? I had to
manually add that, so looks like recent MAINTAINERS changes aren't quite
right.
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/pci.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/pci.c
index 412f4a134e4a..87ef7f321065 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/pci.c
@@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static int ath11k_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
{
struct ath11k_base *ab;
struct ath11k_pci *ab_pci;
- u32 soc_hw_version_major, soc_hw_version_minor, addr;
+ u32 soc_hw_version_major, soc_hw_version_minor;
int ret;
u32 sub_version;
@@ -955,8 +955,7 @@ static int ath11k_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
* from DT. If memory is reserved from DT for FW, ath11k driver need not
* allocate memory.
*/
- ret = of_property_read_u32(ab->dev->of_node, "memory-region", &addr);
- if (!ret)
+ if (of_property_present(ab->dev->of_node, "memory-region"))
set_bit(ATH11K_FLAG_FIXED_MEM_RGN, &ab->dev_flags);
ret = ath11k_pci_claim(ab_pci, pdev);
--
2.47.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: Use of_property_present() to test property presence
2025-04-08 19:02 [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: Use of_property_present() to test property presence Rob Herring (Arm)
@ 2025-04-10 17:29 ` Jeff Johnson
2025-04-12 4:24 ` Jeff Johnson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Johnson @ 2025-04-10 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring (Arm), Jeff Johnson; +Cc: linux-wireless, ath11k, linux-kernel
On 4/8/2025 12:02 PM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> The use of of_property_read_u32() isn't really correct as
> "memory-region" contains phandles (though those happen to be u32s. As
> it is just testing for property presence, use of_property_present()
> instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> I'm assuming this should still go to linux-wireless list? I had to
> manually add that, so looks like recent MAINTAINERS changes aren't quite
> right.
Yes, it should go to both ath11k and linux-wireless
Johannes has a fix that needs to make its way through the trees:
https://msgid.link/20250329220135.8bfaffbad97d.I946354c2395f4a30b8c435857a92553b1b58df5b@changeid
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/pci.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/pci.c
> index 412f4a134e4a..87ef7f321065 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/pci.c
> @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static int ath11k_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> {
> struct ath11k_base *ab;
> struct ath11k_pci *ab_pci;
> - u32 soc_hw_version_major, soc_hw_version_minor, addr;
> + u32 soc_hw_version_major, soc_hw_version_minor;
> int ret;
> u32 sub_version;
>
> @@ -955,8 +955,7 @@ static int ath11k_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> * from DT. If memory is reserved from DT for FW, ath11k driver need not
> * allocate memory.
> */
> - ret = of_property_read_u32(ab->dev->of_node, "memory-region", &addr);
> - if (!ret)
> + if (of_property_present(ab->dev->of_node, "memory-region"))
> set_bit(ATH11K_FLAG_FIXED_MEM_RGN, &ab->dev_flags);
>
> ret = ath11k_pci_claim(ab_pci, pdev);
LGTM, I'll pick this up
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: Use of_property_present() to test property presence
2025-04-08 19:02 [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: Use of_property_present() to test property presence Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-04-10 17:29 ` Jeff Johnson
@ 2025-04-12 4:24 ` Jeff Johnson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Johnson @ 2025-04-12 4:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Johnson, Rob Herring (Arm); +Cc: linux-wireless, ath11k, linux-kernel
On Tue, 08 Apr 2025 14:02:11 -0500, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> The use of of_property_read_u32() isn't really correct as
> "memory-region" contains phandles (though those happen to be u32s. As
> it is just testing for property presence, use of_property_present()
> instead.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] wifi: ath11k: Use of_property_present() to test property presence
commit: d118047f82408201eb433a7ff7d505e72515d7e0
Best regards,
--
Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-12 4:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-04-08 19:02 [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: Use of_property_present() to test property presence Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-04-10 17:29 ` Jeff Johnson
2025-04-12 4:24 ` Jeff Johnson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox