From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] objtool: Fix INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 16:43:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250409144345.GG9833@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1744095216.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org>
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 12:02:12AM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> I decided to keep the "unsupported instruction in callable function"
> warning, it's not hurting anything. As a result we now have
> INSN_SYSCALL and INSN_SYSRET.
>
> v4:
> - split up patches
> - don't get rid of "unsupported instruction in callable function" warning
> - split INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH -> INSN_SYSCALL / INSN_SYSRET
>
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/9b23e4413873bee38961e628b0c73f6d3a26d494.1743799705.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
>
> Josh Poimboeuf (4):
> objtool: Fix INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH handling in validate_unret()
> objtool: Split INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH into INSN_SYSCALL and INSN_SYSRET
> objtool: Stop UNRET validation on UD2
> objtool, xen: Fix INSN_SYSCALL / INSN_SYSRET semantics
This looks nice, thanks for doing that. Belated:
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-08 7:02 [PATCH v4 0/4] objtool: Fix INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08 7:02 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] objtool: Fix INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH handling in validate_unret() Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08 8:12 ` [tip: objtool/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08 7:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] objtool: Split INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH into INSN_SYSCALL and INSN_SYSRET Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08 8:12 ` [tip: objtool/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08 7:02 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] objtool: Stop UNRET validation on UD2 Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08 8:12 ` [tip: objtool/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08 7:02 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] objtool, xen: Fix INSN_SYSCALL / INSN_SYSRET semantics Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08 8:12 ` [tip: objtool/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] objtool: Fix INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH Ingo Molnar
2025-04-08 7:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-09 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250409144345.GG9833@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox