The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] objtool: Fix INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 09:11:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_TMNOHY4iEDMOB8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1744095216.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org>


* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> wrote:

> I decided to keep the "unsupported instruction in callable function"
> warning, it's not hurting anything.  As a result we now have
> INSN_SYSCALL and INSN_SYSRET.
> 
> v4:
> - split up patches
> - don't get rid of "unsupported instruction in callable function" warning
> - split INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH -> INSN_SYSCALL / INSN_SYSRET
> 
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/9b23e4413873bee38961e628b0c73f6d3a26d494.1743799705.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
> 
> Josh Poimboeuf (4):
>   objtool: Fix INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH handling in validate_unret()
>   objtool: Split INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH into INSN_SYSCALL and INSN_SYSRET
>   objtool: Stop UNRET validation on UD2
>   objtool, xen: Fix INSN_SYSCALL / INSN_SYSRET semantics
> 
>  arch/x86/xen/xen-asm.S               |  4 +---
>  tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c      | 18 ++++++++++-------
>  tools/objtool/check.c                | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  tools/objtool/include/objtool/arch.h |  3 ++-
>  4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

I'm wondering about the timing: can this wait for v6.16, or does it 
trigger on some popular config/build-tools combination?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-08  7:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-08  7:02 [PATCH v4 0/4] objtool: Fix INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] objtool: Fix INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH handling in validate_unret() Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08  8:12   ` [tip: objtool/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] objtool: Split INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH into INSN_SYSCALL and INSN_SYSRET Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08  8:12   ` [tip: objtool/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] objtool: Stop UNRET validation on UD2 Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08  8:12   ` [tip: objtool/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] objtool, xen: Fix INSN_SYSCALL / INSN_SYSRET semantics Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08  8:12   ` [tip: objtool/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08  7:11 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-04-08  7:15   ` [PATCH v4 0/4] objtool: Fix INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH Ingo Molnar
2025-04-09 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z_TMNOHY4iEDMOB8@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox