From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix the scale of IIO free running counters on SNR
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 07:24:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250416142426.3933977-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
There was a mistake in the SNR uncore spec. The counter increments for
every 32 bytes of data sent from the IO agent to the SOC, not 4 bytes
which was documented in the spec.
The event list has been updated.
"EventName": "UNC_IIO_BANDWIDTH_IN.PART0_FREERUN",
"BriefDescription": "Free running counter that increments for every 32
bytes of data sent from the IO agent to the SOC",
Update the scale of the IIO bandwidth in free running counters as well.
Fixes: 210cc5f9db7a ("perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add uncore support for Snow Ridge server")
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
index 60973c209c0e..35da2c486e8d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
@@ -4891,28 +4891,28 @@ static struct uncore_event_desc snr_uncore_iio_freerunning_events[] = {
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(ioclk, "event=0xff,umask=0x10"),
/* Free-Running IIO BANDWIDTH IN Counters */
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port0, "event=0xff,umask=0x20"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port0.scale, "3.814697266e-6"),
+ INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port0.scale, "3.0517578125e-5"),
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port0.unit, "MiB"),
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port1, "event=0xff,umask=0x21"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port1.scale, "3.814697266e-6"),
+ INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port1.scale, "3.0517578125e-5"),
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port1.unit, "MiB"),
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port2, "event=0xff,umask=0x22"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port2.scale, "3.814697266e-6"),
+ INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port2.scale, "3.0517578125e-5"),
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port2.unit, "MiB"),
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port3, "event=0xff,umask=0x23"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port3.scale, "3.814697266e-6"),
+ INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port3.scale, "3.0517578125e-5"),
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port3.unit, "MiB"),
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port4, "event=0xff,umask=0x24"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port4.scale, "3.814697266e-6"),
+ INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port4.scale, "3.0517578125e-5"),
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port4.unit, "MiB"),
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port5, "event=0xff,umask=0x25"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port5.scale, "3.814697266e-6"),
+ INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port5.scale, "3.0517578125e-5"),
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port5.unit, "MiB"),
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port6, "event=0xff,umask=0x26"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port6.scale, "3.814697266e-6"),
+ INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port6.scale, "3.0517578125e-5"),
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port6.unit, "MiB"),
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port7, "event=0xff,umask=0x27"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port7.scale, "3.814697266e-6"),
+ INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port7.scale, "3.0517578125e-5"),
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port7.unit, "MiB"),
{ /* end: all zeroes */ },
};
--
2.38.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 14:24 kan.liang [this message]
2025-04-16 14:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix the scale of IIO free running counters on ICX kan.liang
2025-04-17 10:38 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2025-04-17 11:09 ` tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2025-04-16 14:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix the scale of IIO free running counters on SPR kan.liang
2025-04-17 10:38 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2025-04-17 11:09 ` tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2025-04-17 10:38 ` [tip: perf/urgent] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix the scale of IIO free running counters on SNR tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2025-04-17 11:09 ` tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250416142426.3933977-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox