From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Tang Jun <dukang.tj@alibaba-inc.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix the scale of IIO free running counters on ICX
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 07:24:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250416142426.3933977-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250416142426.3933977-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
There was a mistake in the ICX uncore spec too. The counter increments
for every 32 bytes rather than 4 bytes.
The same as SNR, there are 1 ioclk and 8 IIO bandwidth in free running
counters. Reuse the snr_uncore_iio_freerunning_events().
Fixes: 2b3b76b5ec67 ("perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add Ice Lake server uncore support")
Reported-by: Tang Jun <dukang.tj@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 33 +---------------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
index 35da2c486e8d..fb08911a1cf6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
@@ -5485,37 +5485,6 @@ static struct freerunning_counters icx_iio_freerunning[] = {
[ICX_IIO_MSR_BW_IN] = { 0xaa0, 0x1, 0x10, 8, 48, icx_iio_bw_freerunning_box_offsets },
};
-static struct uncore_event_desc icx_uncore_iio_freerunning_events[] = {
- /* Free-Running IIO CLOCKS Counter */
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(ioclk, "event=0xff,umask=0x10"),
- /* Free-Running IIO BANDWIDTH IN Counters */
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port0, "event=0xff,umask=0x20"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port0.scale, "3.814697266e-6"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port0.unit, "MiB"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port1, "event=0xff,umask=0x21"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port1.scale, "3.814697266e-6"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port1.unit, "MiB"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port2, "event=0xff,umask=0x22"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port2.scale, "3.814697266e-6"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port2.unit, "MiB"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port3, "event=0xff,umask=0x23"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port3.scale, "3.814697266e-6"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port3.unit, "MiB"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port4, "event=0xff,umask=0x24"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port4.scale, "3.814697266e-6"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port4.unit, "MiB"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port5, "event=0xff,umask=0x25"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port5.scale, "3.814697266e-6"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port5.unit, "MiB"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port6, "event=0xff,umask=0x26"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port6.scale, "3.814697266e-6"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port6.unit, "MiB"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port7, "event=0xff,umask=0x27"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port7.scale, "3.814697266e-6"),
- INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(bw_in_port7.unit, "MiB"),
- { /* end: all zeroes */ },
-};
-
static struct intel_uncore_type icx_uncore_iio_free_running = {
.name = "iio_free_running",
.num_counters = 9,
@@ -5523,7 +5492,7 @@ static struct intel_uncore_type icx_uncore_iio_free_running = {
.num_freerunning_types = ICX_IIO_FREERUNNING_TYPE_MAX,
.freerunning = icx_iio_freerunning,
.ops = &skx_uncore_iio_freerunning_ops,
- .event_descs = icx_uncore_iio_freerunning_events,
+ .event_descs = snr_uncore_iio_freerunning_events,
.format_group = &skx_uncore_iio_freerunning_format_group,
};
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 14:24 [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix the scale of IIO free running counters on SNR kan.liang
2025-04-16 14:24 ` kan.liang [this message]
2025-04-17 10:38 ` [tip: perf/urgent] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix the scale of IIO free running counters on ICX tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2025-04-17 11:09 ` tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2025-04-16 14:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix the scale of IIO free running counters on SPR kan.liang
2025-04-17 10:38 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2025-04-17 11:09 ` tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2025-04-17 10:38 ` [tip: perf/urgent] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix the scale of IIO free running counters on SNR tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2025-04-17 11:09 ` tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250416142426.3933977-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dukang.tj@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox