public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: luca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
To: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@codethink.co.uk>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Vineeth Pillai	 <vineeth@bitbyteword.org>
Subject: Re: SCHED_DEADLINE tasks missing their deadline with SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM jobs in the mix (using GRUB)
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 21:46:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250523214603.043833e3@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92690eb9158c1019dc0945f8298800cad17cae05.camel@codethink.co.uk>

Hi Marcel,

sorry, but I have some additional questions to fully understand your
setup...

On Mon, 19 May 2025 15:32:27 +0200
Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@codethink.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
> > just a quick question to better understand your setup (and check
> > where the issue comes from):
> > in the email below, you say that tasks are statically assigned to
> > cores; how did you do this? Did you use isolated cpusets,  
> 
> Yes, we use the cpuset controller from the cgroup-v2 APIs in the
> linux kernel in order to partition CPUs and memory nodes. In detail,
> we use the AllowedCPUs and AllowedMemoryNodes in systemd's slice
> configurations.

How do you configure systemd? I am having troubles in reproducing your
AllowedCPUs configuration... This is an example of what I am trying:
	sudo systemctl set-property --runtime custom-workload.slice AllowedCPUs=1
	sudo systemctl set-property --runtime init.scope AllowedCPUs=0,2,3
	sudo systemctl set-property --runtime system.slice AllowedCPUs=0,2,3
	sudo systemctl set-property --runtime user.slice AllowedCPUs=0,2,3
and then I try to run a SCHED_DEADLINE application with
	sudo systemd-run --scope -p Slice=custom-workload.slice <application>

However, this does not work because systemd is not creating an isolated
cpuset... So, the root domain still contains CPUs 0-3, and the
"custom-workload.slice" cpuset only has CPU 1. Hence, the check
                        /*
                         * Don't allow tasks with an affinity mask smaller than
                         * the entire root_domain to become SCHED_DEADLINE. We
                         * will also fail if there's no bandwidth available.
                         */
                        if (!cpumask_subset(span, p->cpus_ptr) ||
                            rq->rd->dl_bw.bw == 0) {
                                retval = -EPERM;
                                goto unlock;
                        }
in sched_setsched() fails.


How are you configuring the cpusets? Also, which kernel version are you using?
(sorry if you already posted this information in previous emails and I am
missing something obvious)


			Thanks,
				Luca

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-23 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-28 18:04 SCHED_DEADLINE tasks missing their deadline with SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM jobs in the mix (using GRUB) Marcel Ziswiler
2025-05-02 13:55 ` Juri Lelli
2025-05-02 14:10   ` luca abeni
2025-05-03 13:14     ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-05-05 15:53       ` luca abeni
2025-05-03 11:14   ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-05-07 20:25     ` luca abeni
2025-05-19 13:32       ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-05-20 16:09         ` luca abeni
2025-05-21  9:59           ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-05-23 19:46         ` luca abeni [this message]
2025-05-25 19:29           ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-05-29  9:39             ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-02 14:59               ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-06-17 12:21                 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-18 11:24                   ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-06-20  9:29                     ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-20  9:37                       ` luca abeni
2025-06-20  9:58                         ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-20 14:16                         ` luca abeni
2025-06-20 15:28                           ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-20 16:52                             ` luca abeni
2025-06-24  7:49                               ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-24 12:59                                 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-24 15:00                                   ` luca abeni
2025-06-25  9:30                                     ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-25 10:11                                       ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-25 12:50                                         ` luca abeni
2025-06-26 10:59                                           ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-06-26 11:45                                             ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-25 15:55                                   ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-06-24 13:36                               ` luca abeni
2025-05-30  9:21             ` luca abeni
2025-06-03 11:18               ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-06-06 13:16                 ` luca abeni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250523214603.043833e3@nowhere \
    --to=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.ziswiler@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox