From: luca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@codethink.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vineeth Pillai <vineeth@bitbyteword.org>
Subject: Re: SCHED_DEADLINE tasks missing their deadline with SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM jobs in the mix (using GRUB)
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 11:37:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250620113745.6833bccb@luca64> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aFUqELdqM8VcyNCh@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb>
Hi Juri,
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 11:29:52 +0200
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
> I have been playing a little more with this and noticed (by chance)
> that after writing a value on sched_rt_runtime_us (even the 950000
> default) this seem to 'work' - I don't see deadline misses anymore.
>
> I thus have moved my attention to GRUB related per-cpu variables [1]
> and noticed something that looks fishy with extra_bw: after boot and
> w/o any DEADLINE tasks around (other than dl_servers) all dl_rqs have
> different values [2]. E.g.,
>
> extra_bw : (u64)447170
> extra_bw : (u64)604454
[...]
> So, this might be one thing to look at, but I am honestly still
> confused by why we have weird numbers as the above after boot. Also a
> bit confused by the actual meaning and purpose of the 5 GRUB
> variables we have to deal with.
Sorry about that... I was under the impression they were documented in
some comments, but I might be wrong...
> Luca, Vineeth (for the recent introduction of max_bw), maybe we could
> take a step back and re-check (and maybe and document better :) what
> each variable is meant to do and how it gets updated?
I am not sure about the funny values initially assigned to these
variables, but I can surely provide some documentation about what these
variables represent... I am going to look at this and I'll send some
comments or patches.
Luca
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-20 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-28 18:04 SCHED_DEADLINE tasks missing their deadline with SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM jobs in the mix (using GRUB) Marcel Ziswiler
2025-05-02 13:55 ` Juri Lelli
2025-05-02 14:10 ` luca abeni
2025-05-03 13:14 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-05-05 15:53 ` luca abeni
2025-05-03 11:14 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-05-07 20:25 ` luca abeni
2025-05-19 13:32 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-05-20 16:09 ` luca abeni
2025-05-21 9:59 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-05-23 19:46 ` luca abeni
2025-05-25 19:29 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-05-29 9:39 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-02 14:59 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-06-17 12:21 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-18 11:24 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-06-20 9:29 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-20 9:37 ` luca abeni [this message]
2025-06-20 9:58 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-20 14:16 ` luca abeni
2025-06-20 15:28 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-20 16:52 ` luca abeni
2025-06-24 7:49 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-24 12:59 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-24 15:00 ` luca abeni
2025-06-25 9:30 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-25 10:11 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-25 12:50 ` luca abeni
2025-06-26 10:59 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-06-26 11:45 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-25 15:55 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-06-24 13:36 ` luca abeni
2025-05-30 9:21 ` luca abeni
2025-06-03 11:18 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2025-06-06 13:16 ` luca abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250620113745.6833bccb@luca64 \
--to=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.ziswiler@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox