* [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Fix WFS vs. pending SMI WARN
@ 2025-06-05 19:50 Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: Drop pending_smi vs. INIT_RECEIVED check when setting MP_STATE Sean Christopherson
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2025-06-05 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Christopherson, Paolo Bonzini
Cc: kvm, linux-kernel, syzbot+c1cbaedc2613058d5194
Fix a user-triggerable WARN that syzkaller found by stuffing INIT_RECEIVED,
a.k.a. WFS, and then putting the vCPU into VMX Root Mode (post-VMXON). Use
the same approach KVM uses for dealing with "impossible" emulation when
running a !URG guest, and simply wait until KVM_RUN to detect that the vCPU
has architecturally impossible state.
Sean Christopherson (4):
KVM: x86: Drop pending_smi vs. INIT_RECEIVED check when setting
MP_STATE
KVM: x86: WARN and reject KVM_RUN if vCPU's MP_STATE is SIPI_RECEIVED
KVM: x86: Move INIT_RECEIVED vs. INIT/SIPI blocked check to KVM_RUN
KVM: x86: Refactor handling of SIPI_RECEIVED when setting MP_STATE
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
base-commit: 61374cc145f4a56377eaf87c7409a97ec7a34041
--
2.50.0.rc0.604.gd4ff7b7c86-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: Drop pending_smi vs. INIT_RECEIVED check when setting MP_STATE
2025-06-05 19:50 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Fix WFS vs. pending SMI WARN Sean Christopherson
@ 2025-06-05 19:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: WARN and reject KVM_RUN if vCPU's MP_STATE is SIPI_RECEIVED Sean Christopherson
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2025-06-05 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Christopherson, Paolo Bonzini
Cc: kvm, linux-kernel, syzbot+c1cbaedc2613058d5194
Allow userspace to set a vCPU's mp_state to INIT_RECEIVED in conjunction
with a pending SMI, as rejecting that combination could result in KVM
disallowing reflecting the output from KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS back into KVM
via KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS.
At the time the check was added, smi_pending could only be set in the
context of KVM_RUN, with the vCPU in the RUNNABLE state. I.e. it was
impossible for KVM to save vCPU state such that userspace could see a
pending SMI for a vCPU in WFS.
That no longer holds true now that KVM processes requested SMIs during
KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS, e.g. if a vCPU receives an SMI while in WFS, and
then userspace saves vCPU state.
Note, this may partially re-open the user-triggerable WARN that was mostly
closed by commit 28bf28887976 ("KVM: x86: fix user triggerable warning in
kvm_apic_accept_events()"), but that WARN can already be triggered in
several other ways, e.g. if userspace stuffs VMXON=1 after putting the
vCPU into WFS. That issue will be addressed in an upcoming commit, in a
more robust fashion (hopefully).
Fixes: 1f7becf1b7e2 ("KVM: x86: get smi pending status correctly")
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index dd34a2ec854c..7e3ab297a1bf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -11895,10 +11895,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
/*
* Pending INITs are reported using KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS, disallow
* forcing the guest into INIT/SIPI if those events are supposed to be
- * blocked. KVM prioritizes SMI over INIT, so reject INIT/SIPI state
- * if an SMI is pending as well.
+ * blocked.
*/
- if ((!kvm_apic_init_sipi_allowed(vcpu) || vcpu->arch.smi_pending) &&
+ if (!kvm_apic_init_sipi_allowed(vcpu) &&
(mp_state->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED ||
mp_state->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED))
goto out;
--
2.50.0.rc0.604.gd4ff7b7c86-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: WARN and reject KVM_RUN if vCPU's MP_STATE is SIPI_RECEIVED
2025-06-05 19:50 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Fix WFS vs. pending SMI WARN Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: Drop pending_smi vs. INIT_RECEIVED check when setting MP_STATE Sean Christopherson
@ 2025-06-05 19:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: Move INIT_RECEIVED vs. INIT/SIPI blocked check to KVM_RUN Sean Christopherson
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2025-06-05 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Christopherson, Paolo Bonzini
Cc: kvm, linux-kernel, syzbot+c1cbaedc2613058d5194
WARN if KVM_RUN is reached with a vCPU's mp_state set to SIPI_RECEIVED, as
KVM no longer uses SIPI_RECEIVED internally, and should morph SIPI_RECEIVED
into INIT_RECEIVED with a pending SIPI if userspace forces SIPI_RECEIVED.
See commit 66450a21f996 ("KVM: x86: Rework INIT and SIPI handling") for
more history and details.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 7e3ab297a1bf..c3cbcd9e39f6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -11547,6 +11547,20 @@ static void kvm_put_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
trace_kvm_fpu(0);
}
+static int kvm_x86_vcpu_pre_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ /*
+ * SIPI_RECEIVED is obsolete; KVM leaves the vCPU in Wait-For-SIPI and
+ * tracks the pending SIPI separately. SIPI_RECEIVED is still accepted
+ * by KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS for backwards compatibility, but should be
+ * converted to INIT_RECEIVED.
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return kvm_x86_call(vcpu_pre_run)(vcpu);
+}
+
int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_queued_exception *ex = &vcpu->arch.exception;
@@ -11649,7 +11663,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
goto out;
}
- r = kvm_x86_call(vcpu_pre_run)(vcpu);
+ r = kvm_x86_vcpu_pre_run(vcpu);
if (r <= 0)
goto out;
--
2.50.0.rc0.604.gd4ff7b7c86-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: Move INIT_RECEIVED vs. INIT/SIPI blocked check to KVM_RUN
2025-06-05 19:50 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Fix WFS vs. pending SMI WARN Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: Drop pending_smi vs. INIT_RECEIVED check when setting MP_STATE Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: WARN and reject KVM_RUN if vCPU's MP_STATE is SIPI_RECEIVED Sean Christopherson
@ 2025-06-05 19:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: Refactor handling of SIPI_RECEIVED when setting MP_STATE Sean Christopherson
2025-06-24 19:38 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Fix WFS vs. pending SMI WARN Sean Christopherson
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2025-06-05 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Christopherson, Paolo Bonzini
Cc: kvm, linux-kernel, syzbot+c1cbaedc2613058d5194
Check for the should-be-impossible scenario of a vCPU being in
Wait-For-SIPI with INIT/SIPI blocked during KVM_RUN instead of trying to
detect and prevent illegal combinations in every ioctl that sets relevant
state. Attempting to handle every possible "set" path is a losing game of
whack-a-mole, and risks breaking userspace. E.g. INIT/SIPI are blocked on
Intel if the vCPU is in VMX Root mode (post-VMXON), and on AMD if GIF=0.
Handling those scenarios would require potentially breaking changes to
{vmx,svm}_set_nested_state().
Moving the check to KVM_RUN fixes a syzkaller-induced splat due to the
aforementioned VMXON case, and in theory should close the hole once and for
all.
Note, kvm_x86_vcpu_pre_run() already handles SIPI_RECEIVED, only the WFS
case needs additional attention.
Reported-by: syzbot+c1cbaedc2613058d5194@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=490ae63d8d89cb82c5d462d16962cf371df0e476
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index c3cbcd9e39f6..9935307ad41f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5487,12 +5487,6 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
(events->exception.nr > 31 || events->exception.nr == NMI_VECTOR))
return -EINVAL;
- /* INITs are latched while in SMM */
- if (events->flags & KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SMM &&
- (events->smi.smm || events->smi.pending) &&
- vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED)
- return -EINVAL;
-
process_nmi(vcpu);
/*
@@ -11558,6 +11552,14 @@ static int kvm_x86_vcpu_pre_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED))
return -EINVAL;
+ /*
+ * Disallow running the vCPU if userspace forced it into an impossible
+ * MP_STATE, e.g. if the vCPU is in WFS but SIPI is blocked.
+ */
+ if (vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED &&
+ !kvm_apic_init_sipi_allowed(vcpu))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
return kvm_x86_call(vcpu_pre_run)(vcpu);
}
@@ -11906,16 +11908,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
goto out;
}
- /*
- * Pending INITs are reported using KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS, disallow
- * forcing the guest into INIT/SIPI if those events are supposed to be
- * blocked.
- */
- if (!kvm_apic_init_sipi_allowed(vcpu) &&
- (mp_state->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED ||
- mp_state->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED))
- goto out;
-
if (mp_state->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED) {
kvm_set_mp_state(vcpu, KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED);
set_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events);
--
2.50.0.rc0.604.gd4ff7b7c86-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: Refactor handling of SIPI_RECEIVED when setting MP_STATE
2025-06-05 19:50 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Fix WFS vs. pending SMI WARN Sean Christopherson
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-05 19:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: Move INIT_RECEIVED vs. INIT/SIPI blocked check to KVM_RUN Sean Christopherson
@ 2025-06-05 19:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-24 19:38 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Fix WFS vs. pending SMI WARN Sean Christopherson
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2025-06-05 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Christopherson, Paolo Bonzini
Cc: kvm, linux-kernel, syzbot+c1cbaedc2613058d5194
Convert the incoming mp_state to INIT_RECIEVED instead of manually calling
kvm_set_mp_state() to make it more obvious that the SIPI_RECEIVED logic is
translating the incoming state to KVM's internal tracking, as opposed to
being some entirely unique flow.
Opportunistically add a comment to explain what the code is doing.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 9935307ad41f..47fef0e7f08f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -11908,11 +11908,17 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
goto out;
}
+ /*
+ * SIPI_RECEIVED is obsolete and no longer used internally; KVM instead
+ * leaves the vCPU in INIT_RECIEVED (Wait-For-SIPI) and pends the SIPI.
+ * Translate SIPI_RECEIVED as appropriate for backwards compatibility.
+ */
if (mp_state->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED) {
- kvm_set_mp_state(vcpu, KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED);
+ mp_state->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED;
set_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events);
- } else
- kvm_set_mp_state(vcpu, mp_state->mp_state);
+ }
+
+ kvm_set_mp_state(vcpu, mp_state->mp_state);
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
ret = 0;
--
2.50.0.rc0.604.gd4ff7b7c86-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Fix WFS vs. pending SMI WARN
2025-06-05 19:50 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Fix WFS vs. pending SMI WARN Sean Christopherson
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-05 19:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: Refactor handling of SIPI_RECEIVED when setting MP_STATE Sean Christopherson
@ 2025-06-24 19:38 ` Sean Christopherson
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2025-06-24 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Christopherson, Paolo Bonzini
Cc: kvm, linux-kernel, syzbot+c1cbaedc2613058d5194
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 12:50:14 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Fix a user-triggerable WARN that syzkaller found by stuffing INIT_RECEIVED,
> a.k.a. WFS, and then putting the vCPU into VMX Root Mode (post-VMXON). Use
> the same approach KVM uses for dealing with "impossible" emulation when
> running a !URG guest, and simply wait until KVM_RUN to detect that the vCPU
> has architecturally impossible state.
>
> Sean Christopherson (4):
> KVM: x86: Drop pending_smi vs. INIT_RECEIVED check when setting
> MP_STATE
> KVM: x86: WARN and reject KVM_RUN if vCPU's MP_STATE is SIPI_RECEIVED
> KVM: x86: Move INIT_RECEIVED vs. INIT/SIPI blocked check to KVM_RUN
> KVM: x86: Refactor handling of SIPI_RECEIVED when setting MP_STATE
>
> [...]
Applied to kvm-x86 misc, thanks!
[1/4] KVM: x86: Drop pending_smi vs. INIT_RECEIVED check when setting MP_STATE
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/c4a37acc5193
[2/4] KVM: x86: WARN and reject KVM_RUN if vCPU's MP_STATE is SIPI_RECEIVED
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/16777ebded41
[3/4] KVM: x86: Move INIT_RECEIVED vs. INIT/SIPI blocked check to KVM_RUN
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/0fe3e8d804fd
[4/4] KVM: x86: Refactor handling of SIPI_RECEIVED when setting MP_STATE
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/58c81bc1e71d
--
https://github.com/kvm-x86/kvm-unit-tests/tree/next
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-06-24 19:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-05 19:50 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Fix WFS vs. pending SMI WARN Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: Drop pending_smi vs. INIT_RECEIVED check when setting MP_STATE Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: WARN and reject KVM_RUN if vCPU's MP_STATE is SIPI_RECEIVED Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: Move INIT_RECEIVED vs. INIT/SIPI blocked check to KVM_RUN Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: Refactor handling of SIPI_RECEIVED when setting MP_STATE Sean Christopherson
2025-06-24 19:38 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Fix WFS vs. pending SMI WARN Sean Christopherson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox