The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v4 11/13] perf/x86: Support to sample SSP register
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:39:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250620103909.1586595-12-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250620103909.1586595-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

This patch adds basic support for sampling SSP register in perf/x86
common code. The x86/intel specific support would be added in next
patch.

Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c            | 2 ++
 arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h     | 1 +
 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 4 +++-
 arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c           | 7 +++++++
 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index e378f33206ed..d3a614ed7d60 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -2244,6 +2244,7 @@ static void setup_pebs_adaptive_sample_data(struct perf_event *event,
 		return;
 
 	perf_regs = container_of(regs, struct x86_perf_regs, regs);
+	perf_regs->ssp = 0;
 	perf_regs->xmm_regs = NULL;
 
 	format_group = basic->format_group;
@@ -2360,6 +2361,7 @@ static void setup_arch_pebs_sample_data(struct perf_event *event,
 		return;
 
 	perf_regs = container_of(regs, struct x86_perf_regs, regs);
+	perf_regs->ssp = 0;
 	perf_regs->xmm_regs = NULL;
 
 	__setup_perf_sample_data(event, iregs, data);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 380f89fd5dac..fcfb8fb6a7a5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -700,6 +700,7 @@ extern void perf_events_lapic_init(void);
 struct pt_regs;
 struct x86_perf_regs {
 	struct pt_regs	regs;
+	u64		ssp;
 	u64		*xmm_regs;
 };
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index 7c9d2bb3833b..bf4cec52f808 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -27,9 +27,11 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
 	PERF_REG_X86_R13,
 	PERF_REG_X86_R14,
 	PERF_REG_X86_R15,
+	/* shadow stack pointer (SSP) */
+	PERF_REG_X86_SSP,
 	/* These are the limits for the GPRs. */
 	PERF_REG_X86_32_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_GS + 1,
-	PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_R15 + 1,
+	PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_SSP + 1,
 
 	/* These all need two bits set because they are 128bit */
 	PERF_REG_X86_XMM0  = 32,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
index 624703af80a1..1cbb9c901a08 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ static unsigned int pt_regs_offset[PERF_REG_X86_MAX] = {
 	PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_X86_R13, r13),
 	PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_X86_R14, r14),
 	PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_X86_R15, r15),
+	/* The pt_regs struct does not store shadow stack pointer. */
+	(unsigned int) -1,
 #endif
 };
 
@@ -68,6 +70,11 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
 		return perf_regs->xmm_regs[idx - PERF_REG_X86_XMM0];
 	}
 
+	if (idx == PERF_REG_X86_SSP) {
+		perf_regs = container_of(regs, struct x86_perf_regs, regs);
+		return perf_regs->ssp;
+	}
+
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(pt_regs_offset)))
 		return 0;
 
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-20  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-20 10:38 [Patch v4 00/13] arch-PEBS enabling for Intel platforms Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:38 ` [Patch v4 01/13] perf/x86/intel: Replace x86_pmu.drain_pebs calling with static call Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:38 ` [Patch v4 02/13] perf/x86/intel: Correct large PEBS flag check Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:38 ` [Patch v4 03/13] perf/x86/intel: Initialize architectural PEBS Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 04/13] perf/x86/intel/ds: Factor out PEBS record processing code to functions Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 05/13] perf/x86/intel/ds: Factor out PEBS group " Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 06/13] perf/x86/intel: Process arch-PEBS records or record fragments Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 07/13] perf/x86/intel: Allocate arch-PEBS buffer and initialize PEBS_BASE MSR Dapeng Mi
2025-06-21  9:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-23  1:17     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-23  7:28       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-23  8:41         ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 08/13] perf/x86/intel: Update dyn_constranit base on PEBS event precise level Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 09/13] perf/x86/intel: Setup PEBS data configuration and enable legacy groups Dapeng Mi
2025-06-21  9:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-23  1:20     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-21  9:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-23  1:38     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-21  9:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-23  1:39     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-21  9:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-23  1:55     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-21  9:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-23  1:55     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 10/13] perf/x86/intel: Add counter group support for arch-PEBS Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:39 ` Dapeng Mi [this message]
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 12/13] perf/x86/intel: Support to sample SSP register " Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 13/13] perf tools: x86: Support to show SSP register Dapeng Mi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250620103909.1586595-12-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox