From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>
Cc: <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <robh@kernel.org>,
<coresight@lists.linaro.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<dianders@chromium.org>, <james.clark@linaro.org>,
<krzk@kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<mike.leach@linaro.org>, <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
<saravanak@google.com>, <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
<suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] arch_topology: update CPU map to use the new API
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 09:31:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250708093149.00005ed2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250707150414.620-3-alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>
On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 16:04:11 +0100
Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com> wrote:
> Cleans up the cpu-map generation using the created API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> index 3ebe77566788..88970f13f684 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> @@ -518,23 +518,23 @@ core_initcall(free_raw_capacity);
> */
> static int __init get_cpu_for_node(struct device_node *node)
> {
> + struct device_node *cpu_node __free(device_node) = NULL;
> int cpu;
> - struct device_node *cpu_node __free(device_node) =
> - of_parse_phandle(node, "cpu", 0);
>
> - if (!cpu_node)
> - return -1;
> + cpu = of_cpu_phandle_to_id(node, &cpu_node, 0);
>
> - cpu = of_cpu_node_to_id(cpu_node);
Better I think to flip logic to exit early on errors.
So taking previous review into account - something like.
struct device_node *cpu_node = NULL;
int cpu;
cpu = of_cpu_phandle_to_id(node, &cpu_node, 0);
if (cpu == -ENODEV) {
pr_info("CPU node for %pOF exist but the possible cpu range is :%*pbl\n",
cpu_node, cpumask_pr_args(cpu_possible_mask));
return -ENODEV;
} else if (cpu < 0) {
return cpu;
}
topology_parse_cpu_capacity(cpu_node, cpu);
of_node_put(cpu_node);
return cpu;
> if (cpu >= 0)
> topology_parse_cpu_capacity(cpu_node, cpu);
> - else
> + else if (cpu == -ENODEV)
> pr_info("CPU node for %pOF exist but the possible cpu range is :%*pbl\n",
> cpu_node, cpumask_pr_args(cpu_possible_mask));
> + else
> + return -1;
>
> return cpu;
> }
>
> +
Check all patches before posting for noise like this. It sneaks in as
rebases / refactors happen so you always need to eyeball for it at the end
of development.
> static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int package_id,
> int cluster_id, int core_id)
> {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-08 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-07 15:04 [PATCH 0/5] Refactoring finding CPU phandles in DT Alireza Sanaee
2025-07-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] of: add infra for finding CPU id from phandle Alireza Sanaee
2025-07-08 8:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] arch_topology: update CPU map to use the new API Alireza Sanaee
2025-07-08 6:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-07-08 8:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-08 8:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-07-08 8:31 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-07-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] coresight: cti: Use of_cpu_phandle_to_id for grabbing CPU id Alireza Sanaee
2025-07-08 8:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] coresight: " Alireza Sanaee
2025-07-08 8:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf/arm-dsu: refactor cpu id retrieval via new API of_cpu_phandle_to_id Alireza Sanaee
2025-07-08 8:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250708093149.00005ed2@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alireza.sanaee@huawei.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox