public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Edward Srouji <edwards@nvidia.com>
Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parav@nvidia.com,
	cratiu@nvidia.com, vdumitrescu@nvidia.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	tariqt@nvidia.com, mbloch@nvidia.com, gal@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] RDMA/core: Resolve MAC of next-hop device without ARP support
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:32:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250910083229.GK341237@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250907160833.56589-3-edwards@nvidia.com>

On Sun, Sep 07, 2025 at 07:08:31PM +0300, Edward Srouji wrote:
> From: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
> 
> Currently, if the next-hop netdevice does not support ARP resolution,
> the destination MAC address is silently set to zero without reporting
> an error. 

Not an expert here, but from my understanding this is right behavior.
IFF_NOARP means "leave" MAC address as is (zero).

> This leads to incorrect behavior and may result in packet transmission failures.
> 
> Fix this by deferring MAC resolution to the IP stack via neighbour
> lookup, allowing proper resolution or error reporting as appropriate.

What is the difference here? For IPv4, neighbour lookup is ARP, no?

> 
> Fixes: 7025fcd36bd6 ("IB: address translation to map IP toIB addresses (GIDs)")
> Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vlad Dumitrescu <vdumitrescu@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Edward Srouji <edwards@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c | 10 +++-------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
> index 594e7ee335f7..ca86c482662f 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
> @@ -454,14 +454,10 @@ static int addr_resolve_neigh(const struct dst_entry *dst,
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	if (ndev_flags & IFF_LOOPBACK) {
> +	if (ndev_flags & IFF_LOOPBACK)
>  		memcpy(addr->dst_dev_addr, addr->src_dev_addr, MAX_ADDR_LEN);
> -	} else {
> -		if (!(ndev_flags & IFF_NOARP)) {
> -			/* If the device doesn't do ARP internally */
> -			ret = fetch_ha(dst, addr, dst_in, seq);
> -		}
> -	}
> +	else
> +		ret = fetch_ha(dst, addr, dst_in, seq);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.21.3
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-10  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-07 16:08 [PATCH 0/4] Fix local destination address resolution with VRF Edward Srouji
2025-09-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] RDMA/core: Squash a single user static function Edward Srouji
2025-09-10  8:17   ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-10 10:51     ` Parav Pandit
2025-09-10 12:21       ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] RDMA/core: Resolve MAC of next-hop device without ARP support Edward Srouji
2025-09-10  8:32   ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-09-10 10:55     ` Parav Pandit
2025-09-15 16:30       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-15 17:16         ` Parav Pandit
2025-09-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] RDMA/core: Use route entry flag to decide on loopback traffic Edward Srouji
2025-09-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] IB/ipoib: Ignore L3 master device Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:10 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] Fix local destination address resolution with VRF Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:11   ` [PATCH v1 1/4] RDMA/core: Squash a single user static function Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:11   ` [PATCH v1 2/4] RDMA/core: Resolve MAC of next-hop device without ARP support Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:11   ` [PATCH v1 3/4] RDMA/core: Use route entry flag to decide on loopback traffic Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:11   ` [PATCH v1 4/4] IB/ipoib: Ignore L3 master device Edward Srouji
2025-09-18  9:24   ` [PATCH v1 0/4] Fix local destination address resolution with VRF Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250910083229.GK341237@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=edwards@nvidia.com \
    --cc=gal@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vdumitrescu@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox