From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Edward Srouji <edwards@nvidia.com>
Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parav@nvidia.com,
cratiu@nvidia.com, vdumitrescu@nvidia.com, kuba@kernel.org,
tariqt@nvidia.com, mbloch@nvidia.com, gal@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] RDMA/core: Resolve MAC of next-hop device without ARP support
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:32:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250910083229.GK341237@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250907160833.56589-3-edwards@nvidia.com>
On Sun, Sep 07, 2025 at 07:08:31PM +0300, Edward Srouji wrote:
> From: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
>
> Currently, if the next-hop netdevice does not support ARP resolution,
> the destination MAC address is silently set to zero without reporting
> an error.
Not an expert here, but from my understanding this is right behavior.
IFF_NOARP means "leave" MAC address as is (zero).
> This leads to incorrect behavior and may result in packet transmission failures.
>
> Fix this by deferring MAC resolution to the IP stack via neighbour
> lookup, allowing proper resolution or error reporting as appropriate.
What is the difference here? For IPv4, neighbour lookup is ARP, no?
>
> Fixes: 7025fcd36bd6 ("IB: address translation to map IP toIB addresses (GIDs)")
> Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vlad Dumitrescu <vdumitrescu@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Edward Srouji <edwards@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c | 10 +++-------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
> index 594e7ee335f7..ca86c482662f 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
> @@ -454,14 +454,10 @@ static int addr_resolve_neigh(const struct dst_entry *dst,
> {
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (ndev_flags & IFF_LOOPBACK) {
> + if (ndev_flags & IFF_LOOPBACK)
> memcpy(addr->dst_dev_addr, addr->src_dev_addr, MAX_ADDR_LEN);
> - } else {
> - if (!(ndev_flags & IFF_NOARP)) {
> - /* If the device doesn't do ARP internally */
> - ret = fetch_ha(dst, addr, dst_in, seq);
> - }
> - }
> + else
> + ret = fetch_ha(dst, addr, dst_in, seq);
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 2.21.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-10 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-07 16:08 [PATCH 0/4] Fix local destination address resolution with VRF Edward Srouji
2025-09-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] RDMA/core: Squash a single user static function Edward Srouji
2025-09-10 8:17 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-10 10:51 ` Parav Pandit
2025-09-10 12:21 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] RDMA/core: Resolve MAC of next-hop device without ARP support Edward Srouji
2025-09-10 8:32 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-09-10 10:55 ` Parav Pandit
2025-09-15 16:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-15 17:16 ` Parav Pandit
2025-09-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] RDMA/core: Use route entry flag to decide on loopback traffic Edward Srouji
2025-09-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] IB/ipoib: Ignore L3 master device Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:10 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] Fix local destination address resolution with VRF Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] RDMA/core: Squash a single user static function Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] RDMA/core: Resolve MAC of next-hop device without ARP support Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] RDMA/core: Use route entry flag to decide on loopback traffic Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] IB/ipoib: Ignore L3 master device Edward Srouji
2025-09-18 9:24 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] Fix local destination address resolution with VRF Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250910083229.GK341237@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=edwards@nvidia.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=vdumitrescu@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox