From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Cc: Edward Srouji <edwards@nvidia.com>, "jgg@ziepe.ca" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>,
Vlad Dumitrescu <vdumitrescu@nvidia.com>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] RDMA/core: Squash a single user static function
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:21:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250910122152.GR341237@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY8PR12MB719561454E13288C929E5E70DC0EA@CY8PR12MB7195.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:51:08AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
>
>
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
> > Sent: 10 September 2025 01:48 PM
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 07, 2025 at 07:08:30PM +0300, Edward Srouji wrote:
> > > From: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
> > >
> > > In order to reduce dependencies in IFF_LOOPBACK in route and neighbour
> > > resolution steps, squash the static function to its single caller and
> > > simplify the code. No functional change.
> >
> > It needs more explanation why it is true.
> After second look at the code, it is not true.
> It is not true for the case when dev->flags has IFF_LOOPBACK and translate_ip() failed.
> In existing code, when translate_ip() fails, code still sets dev_addr->network.
> dev_addr->network is not referred if the process_one_req() has error.
>
> > Before this change, we set dev_addr-
> > >network to some value and returned error.
> > That error propagated upto process_one_req(), which handles only some
> > errors and ignores rest.
> >
> > So now, we continue to handle REQ without proper req->addr->network.
> >
> Not exactly. When error is returned by the code addr->network is not filled up, which is correct thing to do.
>
> So at best, commit message should be updated to remove "No functional change".
>
> Will send v1.
Parav,
Please setup your e-mail client, your reply is mixed with mine and
repeats it.
Thanks
>
> > Thanks
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Vlad Dumitrescu <vdumitrescu@nvidia.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Edward Srouji <edwards@nvidia.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c | 49
> > > ++++++++++++++--------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
> > > b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c index be0743dac3ff..594e7ee335f7
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
> > > @@ -465,34 +465,6 @@ static int addr_resolve_neigh(const struct dst_entry
> > *dst,
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int copy_src_l2_addr(struct rdma_dev_addr *dev_addr,
> > > - const struct sockaddr *dst_in,
> > > - const struct dst_entry *dst,
> > > - const struct net_device *ndev)
> > > -{
> > > - int ret = 0;
> > > -
> > > - if (dst->dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK)
> > > - ret = rdma_translate_ip(dst_in, dev_addr);
> > > - else
> > > - rdma_copy_src_l2_addr(dev_addr, dst->dev);
> > > -
> > > - /*
> > > - * If there's a gateway and type of device not ARPHRD_INFINIBAND,
> > > - * we're definitely in RoCE v2 (as RoCE v1 isn't routable) set the
> > > - * network type accordingly.
> > > - */
> > > - if (has_gateway(dst, dst_in->sa_family) &&
> > > - ndev->type != ARPHRD_INFINIBAND)
> > > - dev_addr->network = dst_in->sa_family == AF_INET ?
> > > - RDMA_NETWORK_IPV4 :
> > > - RDMA_NETWORK_IPV6;
> > > - else
> > > - dev_addr->network = RDMA_NETWORK_IB;
> > > -
> > > - return ret;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > static int rdma_set_src_addr_rcu(struct rdma_dev_addr *dev_addr,
> > > unsigned int *ndev_flags,
> > > const struct sockaddr *dst_in,
> > > @@ -503,6 +475,7 @@ static int rdma_set_src_addr_rcu(struct
> > rdma_dev_addr *dev_addr,
> > > *ndev_flags = ndev->flags;
> > > /* A physical device must be the RDMA device to use */
> > > if (ndev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK) {
> > > + int ret;
> > > /*
> > > * RDMA (IB/RoCE, iWarp) doesn't run on lo interface or
> > > * loopback IP address. So if route is resolved to loopback
> > @@
> > > -512,9 +485,27 @@ static int rdma_set_src_addr_rcu(struct rdma_dev_addr
> > *dev_addr,
> > > ndev = rdma_find_ndev_for_src_ip_rcu(dev_net(ndev),
> > dst_in);
> > > if (IS_ERR(ndev))
> > > return -ENODEV;
> > > + ret = rdma_translate_ip(dst_in, dev_addr);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > + } else {
> > > + rdma_copy_src_l2_addr(dev_addr, dst->dev);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - return copy_src_l2_addr(dev_addr, dst_in, dst, ndev);
> > > + /*
> > > + * If there's a gateway and type of device not ARPHRD_INFINIBAND,
> > > + * we're definitely in RoCE v2 (as RoCE v1 isn't routable) set the
> > > + * network type accordingly.
> > > + */
> > > + if (has_gateway(dst, dst_in->sa_family) &&
> > > + ndev->type != ARPHRD_INFINIBAND)
> > > + dev_addr->network = dst_in->sa_family == AF_INET ?
> > > + RDMA_NETWORK_IPV4 :
> > > + RDMA_NETWORK_IPV6;
> > > + else
> > > + dev_addr->network = RDMA_NETWORK_IB;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int set_addr_netns_by_gid_rcu(struct rdma_dev_addr *addr)
> > > --
> > > 2.21.3
> > >
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-10 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-07 16:08 [PATCH 0/4] Fix local destination address resolution with VRF Edward Srouji
2025-09-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] RDMA/core: Squash a single user static function Edward Srouji
2025-09-10 8:17 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-10 10:51 ` Parav Pandit
2025-09-10 12:21 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-09-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] RDMA/core: Resolve MAC of next-hop device without ARP support Edward Srouji
2025-09-10 8:32 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-10 10:55 ` Parav Pandit
2025-09-15 16:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-15 17:16 ` Parav Pandit
2025-09-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] RDMA/core: Use route entry flag to decide on loopback traffic Edward Srouji
2025-09-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] IB/ipoib: Ignore L3 master device Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:10 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] Fix local destination address resolution with VRF Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] RDMA/core: Squash a single user static function Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] RDMA/core: Resolve MAC of next-hop device without ARP support Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] RDMA/core: Use route entry flag to decide on loopback traffic Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] IB/ipoib: Ignore L3 master device Edward Srouji
2025-09-18 9:24 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] Fix local destination address resolution with VRF Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250910122152.GR341237@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=edwards@nvidia.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=vdumitrescu@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox