From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Cc: jpoimboe@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] objtool/x86: Fix NOP decode
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 12:03:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250925100323.GY4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f17d5e92-2aaa-43e7-ba67-ea5e7d07601a@oracle.com>
On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 11:55:23AM +0200, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
>
> On 9/24/25 20:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 07:34:00PM +0200, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
> > >
> > > On 9/24/25 15:45, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > For x86_64 the kernel consistently uses 2 instructions for all NOPs:
> > > >
> > > > 90 - NOP
> > > > 0f 1f /0 - NOPL
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Notably:
> > > >
> > > > - REP NOP is PAUSE, not a NOP instruction.
> > > >
> > > > - 0f {0c...0f} is reserved space,
> > > > except for 0f 0d /1, which is PREFETCHW, not a NOP.
> > > >
> > > > - 0f {19,1c...1f} is reserved space,
> > > > except for 0f 1f /0, which is NOPL.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c | 12 +++++++-----
> > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --- a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
> > > > +++ b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
> > > > @@ -494,7 +494,8 @@ int arch_decode_instruction(struct objto
> > > > break;
> > > > case 0x90:
> > > > + if (prefix != 0xf3) /* REP NOP := PAUSE */
> > > > + insn->type = INSN_NOP;
> > > > break;
> > >
> > > So this covers NOP1 (0x90) and NOP2 (0x66 0x90), right?
> >
> > Yes. Everything with opcode 0x90, except 0xf3 0x90, which as stated is
> > PAUSE.
> >
>
> What about 0x49 0x90, which is xchg (XCHG r8,rAX) ?
Ooh, that is a nice one. Yes, that needs fixing. Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-25 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 13:45 [PATCH 0/3] objtool: Few x86 decoder updates Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-24 13:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] objtool/x86: Remove 0xea hack Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 9:55 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-10-14 11:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-24 13:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] objtool/x86: Add UDB support Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 9:56 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-10-14 11:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-24 13:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] objtool/x86: Fix NOP decode Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-24 17:34 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-09-24 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 9:55 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-09-25 10:03 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-09-25 10:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 11:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-09-25 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 13:04 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-09-25 14:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 13:05 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-10-14 11:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250925100323.GY4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox