From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: alexandre.chartre@oracle.com, jpoimboe@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] objtool/x86: Fix NOP decode
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 14:43:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250925124332.GA3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2f6775f-0be5-401b-bc01-effd3f428482@citrix.com>
On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 12:29:18PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > I've made that:
> >
> > case 0x90:
> > if (rex_b) /* XCHG %r8, %rax */
> > break;
> >
> > if (prefix == 0xf3) /* REP NOP := PAUSE */
> > break;
> >
> > insn->type = INSN_NOP;
> > break;
>
> Legacy prefixes can come in any order. What is F3 66 90 ?
>
> Also, VEX/EVEX/REX2 want excluding too, all of which can encode rex_b
> differently.
So luckily objtool only really cares about instructions as found in the
kernel text. Neither f3 66 90 nor VEX/EVEX/REX2 prefixes are of much
concern.
But yes.. I happen to have an insn_is_nop() function that can be used on
userspace, and that certainly wants to be taught about these... x86 is
such a pain :/
> Is it really only rex_b which prevents NOP becoming a pause, or is it
> any REX prefix? I would have thought it was any REX prefix.
SDM opcode table and instruction reference seems consistent with f3
only.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-25 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 13:45 [PATCH 0/3] objtool: Few x86 decoder updates Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-24 13:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] objtool/x86: Remove 0xea hack Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 9:55 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-10-14 11:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-24 13:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] objtool/x86: Add UDB support Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 9:56 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-10-14 11:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-24 13:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] objtool/x86: Fix NOP decode Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-24 17:34 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-09-24 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 9:55 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-09-25 10:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 10:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 11:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-09-25 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-09-25 13:04 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-09-25 14:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 13:05 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-10-14 11:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250925124332.GA3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox