From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] compiler_types: Warn about unused static inline functions on second
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 08:16:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251106151649.GA1693433@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251106105000.2103276-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 11:50:00AM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>
> Per Nathan, clang catches unused "static inline" functions in C files since
> commit 6863f5643dd7 ("kbuild: allow Clang to find unused static inline
> functions for W=1 build").
>
> Linus said:
>
> > So I entirely ignore W=1 issues, because I think so many of the extra
> > warnings are bogus.
> >
> > But if this one in particular is causing more problems than most -
> > some teams do seem to use W=1 as part of their test builds - it's fine
> > to send me a patch that just moves bad warnings to W=2.
> >
> > And if anybody uses W=2 for their test builds, that's THEIR problem..
>
> Here is the change to bump the warning from W=1 to W=2.
>
> Fixes: 6863f5643dd7 ("kbuild: allow Clang to find unused static inline functions for W=1 build")
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
I can take this as a fix via kbuild or Linus can apply it directly
but...
> ---
> include/linux/compiler_types.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_types.h b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> index 59288a2c1ad2..575a03643fa1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data {
> * for W=1 build. This will allow clang to find unused functions. Remove the
> * __inline_maybe_unused entirely after fixing most of -Wunused-function warnings.
> */
The comment should be updated to W=2 instead of W=1 and we should
probably drop the sentence about removing __inline_maybe_unused entirely
since people such as Peter will never want this behavior by default. I
do not mind doing it myself if I take it.
> -#ifdef KBUILD_EXTRA_WARN1
> +#ifdef KBUILD_EXTRA_WARN2
> #define __inline_maybe_unused
> #else
> #define __inline_maybe_unused __maybe_unused
> --
> 2.50.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-06 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-06 10:50 [PATCH v1 1/1] compiler_types: Warn about unused static inline functions on second Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-06 15:16 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2025-11-06 16:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-06 17:06 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-11-07 7:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-06 19:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-07 18:29 ` Nathan Chancellor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251106151649.GA1693433@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox