From: "ccc194101@163.com" <ccc194101@163.com>
To: stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"Benjamin Tissoires" <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
"Alan Swanson" <reiver@improbability.net>
Cc: gregkh <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
usb-storage <usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
chenchangcheng <chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: usb-storage: No additional quirks need to be added to the ECD819-SU3 optical drive.
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 09:41:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202511100941253989454@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: c7bf59b5-8078-4b47-b56a-7b5568272d07@rowland.harvard.edu
>On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 02:10:46PM +0800, ccc194101@163.com wrote:
>> From: Chen Changcheng <chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn>
>>
>> The optical drive of ECD819-SU3 has the same vid and pid as INIC-3069,
>> as follows:
>> T:? Bus=02 Lev=02 Prnt=02 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#=? 3 Spd=5000 MxCh= 0
>> D:? Ver= 3.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 9 #Cfgs=? 1
>> P:? Vendor=13fd ProdID=3940 Rev= 3.10
>> S:? Manufacturer=HL-DT-ST
>> S:? Product= DVD+-RW GT80N
>> S:? SerialNumber=423349524E4E38303338323439202020
>> C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=80 MxPwr=144mA
>> I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=08(stor.) Sub=02 Prot=50 Driver=usb-storage
>> E:? Ad=83(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=1024 Ivl=0ms
>> E:? Ad=0a(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=1024 Ivl=0ms
>>
>> This will result in the optical drive device also adding
>> the quirks of US_FL_NO_ATA_1X. When performing an erase operation,
>> it will fail, and the reason for the failure is as follows:
>> [? 388.967742] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 Send: scmd 0x00000000d20c33a7
>> [? 388.967742] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 CDB: ATA command pass through(12)/Blank a1 11 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> [? 388.967773] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 Done: SUCCESS Result: hostbyte=DID_TARGET_FAILURE driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s
>> [? 388.967773] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 CDB: ATA command pass through(12)/Blank a1 11 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> [? 388.967803] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 Sense Key : Illegal Request [current]
>> [? 388.967803] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 Add. Sense: Invalid field in cdb
>> [? 388.967803] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 scsi host busy 1 failed 0
>> [? 388.967803] sr 5:0:0:0: Notifying upper driver of completion (result 8100002)
>> [? 388.967834] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 0 sectors total, 0 bytes done.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Changcheng <chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn>
>> ---
>>? drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h | 6 ++++++
>>? 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h
>> index 1477e31d7763..6d32b787bff8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h
>> @@ -97,6 +97,12 @@ UNUSUAL_DEV(0x125f, 0xa94a, 0x0160, 0x0160,
>>? USB_SC_DEVICE, USB_PR_DEVICE, NULL,
>>? US_FL_NO_ATA_1X),
>>?
>> +UNUSUAL_DEV(0x13fd, 0x3940, 0x0310, 0x0310,
>> + "Initio Corporation",
>> + "external DVD burner ECD819-SU3",
>> + USB_SC_DEVICE, USB_PR_DEVICE, NULL,
>> + NULL),
>> +
>>? /* Reported-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> */
>>? UNUSUAL_DEV(0x13fd, 0x3940, 0x0000, 0x9999,
>>? "Initio Corporation",
>
>It's unprecedented to have two quirks with the same VID and PID, where
>the second augments the first by virtue of its wider range of bcdDevice
>values.
>
>As explained in commit 89f23d51defc ("uas: Add US_FL_IGNORE_RESIDUE for
>Initio Corporation INIC-3069"), the original Initio Corporation
>quirk in unusual_uas.h was added as a copy of the corresponding quirk in
>unusual_devs.h, which applies only to bcdDevice = 0x0209.? Should we
>simply limit the existing unusual_uas.h quirk in the same way?
>
>Benjamin and Alan, you two appear to be the people who originally
>reported the need for this uas quirk.? Do you have any objection to
>changing the bcdDevice range from 0x0000 - 0x9999 to 0x0209 - 0x0209??
>Or can you suggest a range that does not include 0x0310?
>
>Alan Stern
Of course, we cannot have two quirks on devices with the same PID and VID.
However, since we do not have the INIC-3069 USB device here, we cannot
determine how to narrow down the scope. As you suggested,
it would be best to narrow the bcdDevice range to 0x0209 - 0x0209.
Chen Changcheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-10 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 6:10 [PATCH] usb: usb-storage: No additional quirks need to be added to the ECD819-SU3 optical drive ccc194101
2025-11-07 15:49 ` Alan Stern
2025-11-10 1:41 ` ccc194101 [this message]
2025-11-11 9:16 ` Alan Swanson
2025-11-09 4:53 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-09 5:05 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202511100941253989454@163.com \
--to=ccc194101@163.com \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiver@improbability.net \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox