[PATCH 6.12 00/40] 6.12.57-rc1 review

[PATCH 6.12 00/40] 6.12.57-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.57 release.
There are 40 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:00:34 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.57-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 6.12.57-rc1

Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
    sfc: fix NULL dereferences in ef100_process_design_param()

Xiaogang Chen <xiaogang.chen@amd.com>
    udmabuf: fix a buf size overflow issue during udmabuf creation

Aditya Kumar Singh <quic_adisi@quicinc.com>
    wifi: ath12k: fix read pointer after free in ath12k_mac_assign_vif_to_vdev()

Kees Bakker <kees@ijzerbout.nl>
    iommu/vt-d: Avoid use of NULL after WARN_ON_ONCE

William Breathitt Gray <wbg@kernel.org>
    gpio: idio-16: Define fixed direction of the GPIO lines

Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>
    gpio: regmap: add the .fixed_direction_output configuration parameter

Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com>
    gpio: regmap: Allow to allocate regmap-irq device

Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
    bits: introduce fixed-type GENMASK_U*()

Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
    bits: add comments and newlines to #if, #else and #endif directives

Wang Liang <wangliang74@huawei.com>
    bonding: check xdp prog when set bond mode

Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
    bonding: return detailed error when loading native XDP fails

Alexander Wetzel <Alexander@wetzel-home.de>
    wifi: cfg80211: Add missing lock in cfg80211_check_and_end_cac()

Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
    f2fs: fix to avoid panic once fallocation fails for pinfile

Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
    mptcp: pm: in-kernel: C-flag: handle late ADD_ADDR

Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
    selftests: mptcp: join: mark 'delete re-add signal' as skipped if not supported

Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
    selftests: mptcp: disable add_addr retrans in endpoint_tests

Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
    docs: kdoc: handle the obsolescensce of docutils.ErrorString()

Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
    arch: Add the macro COMPILE_OFFSETS to all the asm-offsets.c

Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
    sched_ext: Make qmap dump operation non-destructive

Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
    btrfs: use smp_mb__after_atomic() when forcing COW in create_pending_snapshot()

Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
    btrfs: tree-checker: add inode extref checks

Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
    btrfs: abort transaction if we fail to update inode in log replay dir fixup

Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
    btrfs: use level argument in log tree walk callback replay_one_buffer()

Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
    btrfs: always drop log root tree reference in btrfs_replay_log()

Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
    btrfs: scrub: replace max_t()/min_t() with clamp() in scrub_throttle_dev_io()

Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
    btrfs: zoned: refine extent allocator hint selection

Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
    btrfs: zoned: return error from btrfs_zone_finish_endio()

Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
    btrfs: abort transaction in the process_one_buffer() log tree walk callback

Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
    btrfs: abort transaction on specific error places when walking log tree

Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
    cpuset: Use new excpus for nocpu error check when enabling root partition

Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik@amd.com>
    EDAC/mc_sysfs: Increase legacy channel support to 16

David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>
    x86/bugs: Fix reporting of LFENCE retpoline

David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>
    x86/bugs: Report correct retbleed mitigation status

Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
    seccomp: passthrough uprobe systemcall without filtering

Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
    perf: Skip user unwind if the task is a kernel thread

Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
    perf: Have get_perf_callchain() return NULL if crosstask and user are set

Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
    perf: Use current->flags & PF_KTHREAD|PF_USER_WORKER instead of current->mm == NULL

Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
    perf/x86/intel: Add ICL_FIXED_0_ADAPTIVE bit into INTEL_FIXED_BITS_MASK

Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
    audit: record fanotify event regardless of presence of rules

Xiang Mei <xmei5@asu.edu>
    net/sched: sch_qfq: Fix null-deref in agg_dequeue


-------------

Diffstat:

 Documentation/sphinx/kernel_abi.py              |  4 +-
 Documentation/sphinx/kernel_feat.py             |  4 +-
 Documentation/sphinx/kernel_include.py          |  6 ++-
 Documentation/sphinx/maintainers_include.py     |  4 +-
 Makefile                                        |  4 +-
 arch/alpha/kernel/asm-offsets.c                 |  1 +
 arch/arc/kernel/asm-offsets.c                   |  1 +
 arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.c                   |  2 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c                 |  1 +
 arch/csky/kernel/asm-offsets.c                  |  1 +
 arch/hexagon/kernel/asm-offsets.c               |  1 +
 arch/loongarch/kernel/asm-offsets.c             |  2 +
 arch/m68k/kernel/asm-offsets.c                  |  1 +
 arch/microblaze/kernel/asm-offsets.c            |  1 +
 arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c                  |  2 +
 arch/nios2/kernel/asm-offsets.c                 |  1 +
 arch/openrisc/kernel/asm-offsets.c              |  1 +
 arch/parisc/kernel/asm-offsets.c                |  1 +
 arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c               |  1 +
 arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c                 |  1 +
 arch/s390/kernel/asm-offsets.c                  |  1 +
 arch/sh/kernel/asm-offsets.c                    |  1 +
 arch/sparc/kernel/asm-offsets.c                 |  1 +
 arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c                    |  2 +
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c                    | 10 ++--
 arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h               |  6 ++-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c                      |  9 ++--
 arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h                              |  2 +-
 arch/xtensa/kernel/asm-offsets.c                |  1 +
 drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c                       |  2 +-
 drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c                    | 24 ++++++++++
 drivers/gpio/gpio-idio-16.c                     |  5 ++
 drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c                      | 53 ++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c                     |  7 +--
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c                 | 11 +++--
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c              |  3 ++
 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c         |  6 +--
 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c            | 47 ++++++++----------
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/mac.c           |  6 +--
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c                              |  2 +-
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c                          |  6 ++-
 fs/btrfs/inode.c                                |  7 +--
 fs/btrfs/scrub.c                                |  3 +-
 fs/btrfs/transaction.c                          |  2 +-
 fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c                         | 37 ++++++++++++++
 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c                             | 64 +++++++++++++++++++------
 fs/btrfs/zoned.c                                |  8 ++--
 fs/btrfs/zoned.h                                |  9 ++--
 fs/f2fs/file.c                                  |  8 ++--
 fs/f2fs/segment.c                               | 20 ++++----
 include/linux/audit.h                           |  2 +-
 include/linux/bitops.h                          |  1 -
 include/linux/bits.h                            | 38 ++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/gpio/regmap.h                     | 16 +++++++
 include/net/bonding.h                           |  1 +
 include/net/pkt_sched.h                         | 25 +++++++++-
 kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c                          |  6 +--
 kernel/events/callchain.c                       | 16 +++----
 kernel/events/core.c                            |  7 +--
 kernel/seccomp.c                                | 32 ++++++++++---
 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c                          |  6 +++
 net/sched/sch_api.c                             | 10 ----
 net/sched/sch_hfsc.c                            | 16 -------
 net/sched/sch_qfq.c                             |  2 +-
 net/wireless/reg.c                              |  4 ++
 tools/sched_ext/scx_qmap.bpf.c                  | 18 ++++++-
 tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh |  3 +-
 67 files changed, 442 insertions(+), 164 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/40] 6.12.57-rc1 review

[Peter Schneider]

Am 31.10.2025 um 15:00 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.57 release.
> There are 40 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg oddities or regressions found.

Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>


Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider

-- 
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you.                    -- David McCullough Jr.

OpenPGP:  0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/40] 6.12.57-rc1 review

[Brett Mastbergen]

On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:04 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.57 release.
> There are 40 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:00:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.57-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Builds successfully.  Boots and works on qemu and Dell XPS 15 9520 w/
Intel Core i7-12600H

Tested-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>

Thanks,
Brett

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/40] 6.12.57-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 15:00:53 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.57 release.
> There are 40 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:00:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.57-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v6.12:
    10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
    28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
    120 tests:	120 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	6.12.57-rc1-gc3010c2f692b
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
                tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
                tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
                tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/40] 6.12.57-rc1 review

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 644 bytes --]

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.57 release.
> There are 40 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.12.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Best regards,
                                                                Pavel

-- 
In cooperation with DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich,
Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/40] 6.12.57-rc1 review

[Shuah Khan]

On 10/31/25 08:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.57 release.
> There are 40 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:00:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.57-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/40] 6.12.57-rc1 review

[Dileep malepu]

On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:04 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.57 release.
> There are 40 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:00:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.57-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Build and Boot Report for 6.12.57-rc1

The kernel version 6.12.57-rc1 was built and boot-tested using qemu-x86_64
and qemu-arm64 with the default configuration (defconfig). The build and boot
processes completed successfully, and the kernel operated as expected
in the virtualized environments without any issues.

Build Details :
Builds : arm64, x86_64
Kernel Version: 6.12.57-rc1
Configuration : defconfig
Source: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Commit : c3010c2f692bb27dc44fd2318888446944f5846e

Tested-by: Dileep Malepu <dileep.debian@gmail.com>

Best regards,
Dileep Malepu

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/40] 6.12.57-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 at 19:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.57 release.
> There are 40 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:00:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.57-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 6.12.57-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: c3010c2f692bb27dc44fd2318888446944f5846e
* git describe: v6.12.56-41-gc3010c2f692b
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.12.y/build/v6.12.56-41-gc3010c2f692b

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.12.54-253-g426f7f601ca0)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.12.54-253-g426f7f601ca0)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.12.54-253-g426f7f601ca0)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.12.54-253-g426f7f601ca0)

## Test result summary
total: 115140, pass: 97104, fail: 3754, skip: 13950, xfail: 332

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 139 total, 137 passed, 2 failed
* arm64: 57 total, 50 passed, 6 failed, 1 skipped
* i386: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 33 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 40 total, 39 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 25 total, 24 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 22 total, 21 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 4 total, 3 passed, 1 failed
* x86_64: 49 total, 46 passed, 3 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mm
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
* rt-tests-cyclicdeadline
* rt-tests-pi-stress
* rt-tests-pmqtest
* rt-tests-rt-migrate-test
* rt-tests-signaltest

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/40] 6.12.57-rc1 review

[Ron Economos]

On 10/31/25 07:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.57 release.
> There are 40 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:00:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.57-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/40] 6.12.57-rc1 review

[Brett A C Sheffield]

# Librecast Test Results

020/020 [ OK ] liblcrq
010/010 [ OK ] libmld
120/120 [ OK ] liblibrecast

CPU/kernel: Linux auntie 6.12.57-rc1-gc3010c2f692b #126 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Nov  1 19:20:43 -00 2025 x86_64 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux

Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/40] 6.12.57-rc1 review

[Miguel Ojeda]

On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 15:00:53 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.57 release.
> There are 40 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:00:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Boot-tested under QEMU for Rust x86_64, arm64 and riscv64; built-tested
for loongarch64:

Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/40] 6.12.57-rc1 review

[Florian Fainelli]

On 10/31/25 07:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.57 release.
> There are 40 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:00:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.57-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/40] 6.12.57-rc1 review

[Guenter Roeck]

Hi Greg,

On 10/31/25 07:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.57 release.
> There are 40 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:00:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
...
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>      perf: Use current->flags & PF_KTHREAD|PF_USER_WORKER instead of current->mm == NULL
> 
This patch triggers a crash in one of our stress tests.

The problem is also seen in 6.18-rc5, so it is not LTS specific.

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/40] 6.12.57-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 07:02:30PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On 10/31/25 07:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.57 release.
> > There are 40 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:00:34 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> ...
> > Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> >      perf: Use current->flags & PF_KTHREAD|PF_USER_WORKER instead of current->mm == NULL
> > 
> This patch triggers a crash in one of our stress tests.
> 
> The problem is also seen in 6.18-rc5, so it is not LTS specific.

Great, we are bug compatible!  :)