* [tj-sched-ext:for-next] [sched_ext] 7900aa699c: kernel-selftests-bpf.sched_ext.runner.init_enable_count_#.fail
@ 2025-11-14 2:21 kernel test robot
2025-11-14 13:52 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-11-14 2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: oe-lkp, lkp, Dan Schatzberg, Peter Zijlstra, Andrea Righi,
sched-ext, linux-kernel, oliver.sang
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed "kernel-selftests-bpf.sched_ext.runner.init_enable_count_#.fail" on:
commit: 7900aa699c34401cf5d0c701d9ef72880ddc1a83 ("sched_ext: Fix cgroup exit ordering by moving sched_ext_free() to finish_task_switch()")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tj/sched_ext.git for-next
[test failed on linux-next/master b179ce312bafcb8c68dc718e015aee79b7939ff0]
in testcase: kernel-selftests-bpf
version:
with following parameters:
group: sched_ext
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-bpf
compiler: gcc-14
test machine: 8 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700 CPU @ 3.60GHz (Kaby Lake) with 32G memory
(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202511141028.39aed7d5-lkp@intel.com
# ===== START =====
# TEST: init_enable_count
# DESCRIPTION: Verify we correctly count the occurrences of init, enable, etc callbacks.
# OUTPUT:
# ERR: init_enable_count.c:63
# Expected skel->bss->init_task_cnt >= num_pre_forks (611 >= 1024)
# not ok 9 init_enable_count #
# ===== END =====
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251114/202511141028.39aed7d5-lkp@intel.com
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [tj-sched-ext:for-next] [sched_ext] 7900aa699c: kernel-selftests-bpf.sched_ext.runner.init_enable_count_#.fail
2025-11-14 2:21 [tj-sched-ext:for-next] [sched_ext] 7900aa699c: kernel-selftests-bpf.sched_ext.runner.init_enable_count_#.fail kernel test robot
@ 2025-11-14 13:52 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2025-11-14 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel test robot
Cc: oe-lkp, lkp, Dan Schatzberg, Peter Zijlstra, Andrea Righi,
sched-ext, linux-kernel
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 10:21:12AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> kernel test robot noticed "kernel-selftests-bpf.sched_ext.runner.init_enable_count_#.fail" on:
>
> commit: 7900aa699c34401cf5d0c701d9ef72880ddc1a83 ("sched_ext: Fix cgroup exit ordering by moving sched_ext_free() to finish_task_switch()")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tj/sched_ext.git for-next
>
> [test failed on linux-next/master b179ce312bafcb8c68dc718e015aee79b7939ff0]
Unfortunately, I can't reproduce this failure.
> # ===== START =====
> # TEST: init_enable_count
> # DESCRIPTION: Verify we correctly count the occurrences of init, enable, etc callbacks.
> # OUTPUT:
> # ERR: init_enable_count.c:63
> # Expected skel->bss->init_task_cnt >= num_pre_forks (611 >= 1024)
> # not ok 9 init_enable_count #
> # ===== END =====
Looking at the code, I don't see how init_task_cnt can be lower than
num_pre_forks or how the referenced commit can change that (it only changes
the exit path).
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-11-14 13:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-11-14 2:21 [tj-sched-ext:for-next] [sched_ext] 7900aa699c: kernel-selftests-bpf.sched_ext.runner.init_enable_count_#.fail kernel test robot
2025-11-14 13:52 ` Tejun Heo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox