* [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: yt921x: Fix MIB attribute table
@ 2025-11-18 9:12 David Yang
2025-11-18 14:10 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-11-18 16:49 ` Andrew Lunn
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Yang @ 2025-11-18 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: David Yang, Andrew Lunn, Vladimir Oltean, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, linux-kernel
There are holes in the MIB field I didn't notice, leading to wrong
statistics after stress tests.
Signed-off-by: David Yang <mmyangfl@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c b/drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c
index 944988e29127..97fc6085f4d0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c
@@ -56,13 +56,13 @@ static const struct yt921x_mib_desc yt921x_mib_descs[] = {
MIB_DESC(1, 0x30, NULL), /* RxPktSz1024To1518 */
MIB_DESC(1, 0x34, NULL), /* RxPktSz1519ToMax */
- MIB_DESC(2, 0x38, NULL), /* RxGoodBytes */
- /* 0x3c */
+ /* 0x38 unused */
+ MIB_DESC(2, 0x3c, NULL), /* RxGoodBytes */
- MIB_DESC(2, 0x40, "RxBadBytes"),
- /* 0x44 */
- MIB_DESC(2, 0x48, NULL), /* RxOverSzErr */
- /* 0x4c */
+ /* 0x40 */
+ MIB_DESC(2, 0x44, "RxBadBytes"),
+ /* 0x48 */
+ MIB_DESC(1, 0x4c, NULL), /* RxOverSzErr */
MIB_DESC(1, 0x50, NULL), /* RxDropped */
MIB_DESC(1, 0x54, NULL), /* TxBroadcast */
@@ -79,10 +79,10 @@ static const struct yt921x_mib_desc yt921x_mib_descs[] = {
MIB_DESC(1, 0x78, NULL), /* TxPktSz1024To1518 */
MIB_DESC(1, 0x7c, NULL), /* TxPktSz1519ToMax */
- MIB_DESC(2, 0x80, NULL), /* TxGoodBytes */
- /* 0x84 */
- MIB_DESC(2, 0x88, NULL), /* TxCollision */
- /* 0x8c */
+ /* 0x80 unused */
+ MIB_DESC(2, 0x84, NULL), /* TxGoodBytes */
+ /* 0x88 */
+ MIB_DESC(1, 0x8c, NULL), /* TxCollision */
MIB_DESC(1, 0x90, NULL), /* TxExcessiveCollistion */
MIB_DESC(1, 0x94, NULL), /* TxMultipleCollision */
@@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ static int yt921x_read_mib(struct yt921x_priv *priv, int port)
res = yt921x_reg_read(priv, reg + 4, &val1);
if (res)
break;
- val = ((u64)val0 << 32) | val1;
+ val = ((u64)val1 << 32) | val0;
}
WRITE_ONCE(*valp, val);
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: yt921x: Fix MIB attribute table
2025-11-18 9:12 [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: yt921x: Fix MIB attribute table David Yang
@ 2025-11-18 14:10 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-11-18 16:49 ` Andrew Lunn
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Chevallier @ 2025-11-18 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Yang, netdev
Cc: Andrew Lunn, Vladimir Oltean, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, linux-kernel
Hi David,
On 18/11/2025 10:12, David Yang wrote:
> There are holes in the MIB field I didn't notice, leading to wrong
> statistics after stress tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Yang <mmyangfl@gmail.com>
Even if this is fixing a patch that's still in net-next, you may want to
add a fixes tag, as this is a bugfix :/
Maxime
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c b/drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c
> index 944988e29127..97fc6085f4d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c
> @@ -56,13 +56,13 @@ static const struct yt921x_mib_desc yt921x_mib_descs[] = {
>
> MIB_DESC(1, 0x30, NULL), /* RxPktSz1024To1518 */
> MIB_DESC(1, 0x34, NULL), /* RxPktSz1519ToMax */
> - MIB_DESC(2, 0x38, NULL), /* RxGoodBytes */
> - /* 0x3c */
> + /* 0x38 unused */
> + MIB_DESC(2, 0x3c, NULL), /* RxGoodBytes */
>
> - MIB_DESC(2, 0x40, "RxBadBytes"),
> - /* 0x44 */
> - MIB_DESC(2, 0x48, NULL), /* RxOverSzErr */
> - /* 0x4c */
> + /* 0x40 */
> + MIB_DESC(2, 0x44, "RxBadBytes"),
> + /* 0x48 */
> + MIB_DESC(1, 0x4c, NULL), /* RxOverSzErr */
>
> MIB_DESC(1, 0x50, NULL), /* RxDropped */
> MIB_DESC(1, 0x54, NULL), /* TxBroadcast */
> @@ -79,10 +79,10 @@ static const struct yt921x_mib_desc yt921x_mib_descs[] = {
> MIB_DESC(1, 0x78, NULL), /* TxPktSz1024To1518 */
> MIB_DESC(1, 0x7c, NULL), /* TxPktSz1519ToMax */
>
> - MIB_DESC(2, 0x80, NULL), /* TxGoodBytes */
> - /* 0x84 */
> - MIB_DESC(2, 0x88, NULL), /* TxCollision */
> - /* 0x8c */
> + /* 0x80 unused */
> + MIB_DESC(2, 0x84, NULL), /* TxGoodBytes */
> + /* 0x88 */
> + MIB_DESC(1, 0x8c, NULL), /* TxCollision */
>
> MIB_DESC(1, 0x90, NULL), /* TxExcessiveCollistion */
> MIB_DESC(1, 0x94, NULL), /* TxMultipleCollision */
> @@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ static int yt921x_read_mib(struct yt921x_priv *priv, int port)
> res = yt921x_reg_read(priv, reg + 4, &val1);
> if (res)
> break;
> - val = ((u64)val0 << 32) | val1;
> + val = ((u64)val1 << 32) | val0;
> }
>
> WRITE_ONCE(*valp, val);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: yt921x: Fix MIB attribute table
2025-11-18 9:12 [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: yt921x: Fix MIB attribute table David Yang
2025-11-18 14:10 ` Maxime Chevallier
@ 2025-11-18 16:49 ` Andrew Lunn
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2025-11-18 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Yang
Cc: netdev, Vladimir Oltean, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, linux-kernel
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 05:12:33PM +0800, David Yang wrote:
> There are holes in the MIB field I didn't notice, leading to wrong
> statistics after stress tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Yang <mmyangfl@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c b/drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c
> index 944988e29127..97fc6085f4d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c
> @@ -56,13 +56,13 @@ static const struct yt921x_mib_desc yt921x_mib_descs[] = {
>
> MIB_DESC(1, 0x30, NULL), /* RxPktSz1024To1518 */
> MIB_DESC(1, 0x34, NULL), /* RxPktSz1519ToMax */
> - MIB_DESC(2, 0x38, NULL), /* RxGoodBytes */
> - /* 0x3c */
> + /* 0x38 unused */
> + MIB_DESC(2, 0x3c, NULL), /* RxGoodBytes */
How is this described in the datasheet? Maybe add #defines for each
location? At could mean you don't need the comment, since the #define
documents what it is.
> @@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ static int yt921x_read_mib(struct yt921x_priv *priv, int port)
> res = yt921x_reg_read(priv, reg + 4, &val1);
> if (res)
> break;
> - val = ((u64)val0 << 32) | val1;
> + val = ((u64)val1 << 32) | val0;
And that is a different thing, has nothing to do with holes. This
should be mentioned in the commit message.
Andrew
---
pw-bot: cr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-11-18 16:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-11-18 9:12 [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: yt921x: Fix MIB attribute table David Yang
2025-11-18 14:10 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-11-18 16:49 ` Andrew Lunn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox