From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 02/29] sched/fair: Use rq->nohz_tick_stopped in update_nohz_stats()
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 09:26:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251208092744.32737-2-kprateek.nayak@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251208083602.31898-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
"rq->nohz_tick_stopped" always follows the state of CPU on
"nohz.idle_cpus_mask". Use the local rq indicator instead of checking
for the CPU on the "idle_cpus_mask".
Use READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() for "rq->nohz_tick_stopped" to ensure
update_nohz_stats() always sees the latest value.
This cleanup is necessary to avoid the number of references to the
global "nohz.idle_cpus_mask" to ease the transition to a distributed
nohz idle tracking strategy.
No functional changes intended.
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 8a5168284eaf..b135c9ce21fe 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -12557,10 +12557,10 @@ void nohz_balance_exit_idle(struct rq *rq)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(rq != this_rq());
- if (likely(!rq->nohz_tick_stopped))
+ if (likely(!READ_ONCE(rq->nohz_tick_stopped)))
return;
- rq->nohz_tick_stopped = 0;
+ WRITE_ONCE(rq->nohz_tick_stopped, 0);
cpumask_clear_cpu(rq->cpu, nohz.idle_cpus_mask);
atomic_dec(&nohz.nr_cpus);
@@ -12608,14 +12608,14 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
* *_avg. The CPU is already part of nohz.idle_cpus_mask so the clear
* of nohz.has_blocked can only happen after checking the new load
*/
- if (rq->nohz_tick_stopped)
+ if (READ_ONCE(rq->nohz_tick_stopped))
goto out;
/* If we're a completely isolated CPU, we don't play: */
if (on_null_domain(rq))
return;
- rq->nohz_tick_stopped = 1;
+ WRITE_ONCE(rq->nohz_tick_stopped, 1);
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, nohz.idle_cpus_mask);
atomic_inc(&nohz.nr_cpus);
@@ -12645,7 +12645,7 @@ static bool update_nohz_stats(struct rq *rq)
if (!rq->has_blocked_load)
return false;
- if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, nohz.idle_cpus_mask))
+ if (!READ_ONCE(rq->nohz_tick_stopped))
return false;
if (!time_after(jiffies, READ_ONCE(rq->last_blocked_load_update_tick)))
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-08 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-08 9:26 [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 00/29] sched/fair: Push-based load balancing K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 01/29] sched/fair: Simplify set_cpu_sd_state_*() with guards K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 03/29] sched/topology: Optimize sd->shared allocation and assignment K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 04/29] sched/fair: Simplify the entry condition for update_idle_cpu_scan() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 05/29] sched/fair: Simplity SIS_UTIL handling in select_idle_cpu() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 06/29] cpumask: Introduce for_each_cpu_and_wrap() and bitfield helpers K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-12 21:03 ` Yury Norov
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 07/29] sched/fair: Use for_each_cpu_and_wrap() in select_idle_capacity() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 08/29] sched/fair: Use for_each_cpu_and_wrap() in select_idle_cpu() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 09/29] sched/fair: Rotate the CPU resposible for busy load balancing K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 10/29] sched/fair: Use xchg() to set sd->nohz_idle state K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 11/29] sched/topology: Attach new hierarchy in rq_attach_root() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 12/29] sched/fair: Fixup sd->nohz_idle state during hotplug / cpuset K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 13/29] sched/fair: Account idle cpus instead of busy cpus in sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 14/29] sched/topology: Introduce fallback sd->shared assignment K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 15/29] sched/topology: Introduce percpu sd_nohz for nohz state tracking K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 16/29] sched/topology: Introduce "nohz_idle_cpus_mask" in sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 17/29] sched/topology: Introduce "nohz_shared_list" to keep track of sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 18/29] sched/fair: Reorder the barrier in nohz_balance_enter_idle() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 19/29] sched/fair: Extract the main _nohz_idle_balance() loop into a helper K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 20/29] sched/fair: Convert find_new_ilb() to use nohz_shared_list K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 21/29] sched/fair: Introduce sched_asym_prefer_idle() for ILB kick K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 22/29] sched/fair: Convert sched_balance_nohz_idle() to use nohz_shared_list K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 23/29] sched/fair: Remove "nohz.idle_cpus_mask" K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 24/29] sched/fair: Optimize global "nohz.nr_cpus" tracking K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 25/29] sched/topology: Add basic debug information for "nohz_shared_list" K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 26/29] [EXPERIMENTAL] sched/fair: Add push task framework K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 27/29] [EXPERIMENTAL] sched/fair: Proactive idle balance using push mechanism K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 28/29] [EXPERIMENTAL] sched/fair: Add a local counter to rate limit task push K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 12:33 ` Christian Loehle
2025-12-08 17:35 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 29/29] [EXPERIMENTAL] sched/fair: Faster alternate for intra-NUMA newidle balance K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 14:04 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 00/29] sched/fair: Push-based load balancing Shrikanth Hegde
2025-12-08 17:36 ` K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251208092744.32737-2-kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox