From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 22/29] sched/fair: Convert sched_balance_nohz_idle() to use nohz_shared_list
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 09:27:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251208092744.32737-22-kprateek.nayak@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251208083602.31898-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Convert the main nohz idle load balancing loop in
sched_balance_nohz_idle() to use the distributed nohz idle tracking
mechanism via "nohz_shared_list".
The nifty trick to balance the nohz owner at the very end using
for_each_cpu_wrap() is lost during this transition. Special care is
taken to ensure nohz.{needs_update,has_blocked} are set correctly for a
reattempt if the balance_cpu turns bust towards the end of nohz
balancing preserving the current behavior.
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index ca119c57a2a9..b17861bd684f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -12789,27 +12789,59 @@ static int sched_balance_nohz_idle(int balancing_cpu, unsigned int flags, unsign
{
/* Earliest time when we have to do rebalance again */
unsigned long next_balance = start + 60*HZ;
+ struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
unsigned int update_flags = 0;
- int target_cpu;
- /*
- * Start with the next CPU after the balancing CPU so we will end with
- * balancing CPU and let a chance for other idle cpu to pull load.
- */
- for_each_cpu_wrap(target_cpu, nohz.idle_cpus_mask, balancing_cpu + 1) {
- if (!idle_cpu(target_cpu))
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(sds, &nohz_shared_list, nohz_list_node) {
+ int target_cpu;
+
+ /* No idle CPUs in this domain */
+ if (!atomic_read(&sds->nr_idle_cpus))
continue;
- /*
- * If balancing CPU gets work to do, stop the load balancing
- * work being done for other CPUs. Next load balancing owner
- * will pick it up.
- */
- if (!idle_cpu(balancing_cpu) && need_resched())
- return -EBUSY;
+ for_each_cpu(target_cpu, sds->nohz_idle_cpus_mask) {
+ /* Deal with the balancing CPU at the end. */
+ if (balancing_cpu == target_cpu)
+ continue;
+
+ if (!idle_cpu(target_cpu))
+ continue;
- update_flags |= sched_balance_idle_rq(cpu_rq(target_cpu), flags, &next_balance);
+ /*
+ * If balancing CPU gets work to do, stop the load balancing
+ * work being done for other CPUs. Next load balancing owner
+ * will pick it up.
+ */
+ if (!idle_cpu(balancing_cpu) && need_resched()) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ update_flags |= sched_balance_idle_rq(cpu_rq(target_cpu),
+ flags, &next_balance);
+ }
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ /*
+ * If we reach here, all CPUs have been balance and it is time
+ * to balance the balancing_cpu.
+ *
+ * If coincidentally the balancing CPU turns busy at this point
+ * and is the only nohz idle CPU, we still need to set
+ * nohz.{needs_update,has_blocked} since the CPU can transition
+ * back to nohz idle before the tick hits.
+ *
+ * In the above case, rq->nohz_tick_stopped is never cleared and
+ * nohz_balance_enter_idle() skips setting nohz.has_blocked.
+ * Return -EBUSY instructing the caller to reset the nohz
+ * signals allowing a reattempt.
+ */
+ if (!idle_cpu(balancing_cpu) && need_resched())
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ update_flags |= sched_balance_idle_rq(cpu_rq(balancing_cpu), flags, &next_balance);
/*
* next_balance will be updated only when there is a need.
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-08 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-08 9:26 [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 00/29] sched/fair: Push-based load balancing K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 01/29] sched/fair: Simplify set_cpu_sd_state_*() with guards K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 02/29] sched/fair: Use rq->nohz_tick_stopped in update_nohz_stats() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 03/29] sched/topology: Optimize sd->shared allocation and assignment K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 04/29] sched/fair: Simplify the entry condition for update_idle_cpu_scan() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 05/29] sched/fair: Simplity SIS_UTIL handling in select_idle_cpu() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 06/29] cpumask: Introduce for_each_cpu_and_wrap() and bitfield helpers K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-12 21:03 ` Yury Norov
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 07/29] sched/fair: Use for_each_cpu_and_wrap() in select_idle_capacity() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 08/29] sched/fair: Use for_each_cpu_and_wrap() in select_idle_cpu() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 09/29] sched/fair: Rotate the CPU resposible for busy load balancing K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 10/29] sched/fair: Use xchg() to set sd->nohz_idle state K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 11/29] sched/topology: Attach new hierarchy in rq_attach_root() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 12/29] sched/fair: Fixup sd->nohz_idle state during hotplug / cpuset K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 13/29] sched/fair: Account idle cpus instead of busy cpus in sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 14/29] sched/topology: Introduce fallback sd->shared assignment K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 15/29] sched/topology: Introduce percpu sd_nohz for nohz state tracking K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 16/29] sched/topology: Introduce "nohz_idle_cpus_mask" in sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 17/29] sched/topology: Introduce "nohz_shared_list" to keep track of sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 18/29] sched/fair: Reorder the barrier in nohz_balance_enter_idle() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 19/29] sched/fair: Extract the main _nohz_idle_balance() loop into a helper K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 20/29] sched/fair: Convert find_new_ilb() to use nohz_shared_list K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 21/29] sched/fair: Introduce sched_asym_prefer_idle() for ILB kick K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 23/29] sched/fair: Remove "nohz.idle_cpus_mask" K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 24/29] sched/fair: Optimize global "nohz.nr_cpus" tracking K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 25/29] sched/topology: Add basic debug information for "nohz_shared_list" K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 26/29] [EXPERIMENTAL] sched/fair: Add push task framework K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 27/29] [EXPERIMENTAL] sched/fair: Proactive idle balance using push mechanism K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 28/29] [EXPERIMENTAL] sched/fair: Add a local counter to rate limit task push K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 12:33 ` Christian Loehle
2025-12-08 17:35 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 29/29] [EXPERIMENTAL] sched/fair: Faster alternate for intra-NUMA newidle balance K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 14:04 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 00/29] sched/fair: Push-based load balancing Shrikanth Hegde
2025-12-08 17:36 ` K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251208092744.32737-22-kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox