The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
	Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 22/29] sched/fair: Convert sched_balance_nohz_idle() to use nohz_shared_list
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 09:27:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251208092744.32737-22-kprateek.nayak@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251208083602.31898-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>

Convert the main nohz idle load balancing loop in
sched_balance_nohz_idle() to use the distributed nohz idle tracking
mechanism via "nohz_shared_list".

The nifty trick to balance the nohz owner at the very end using
for_each_cpu_wrap() is lost during this transition. Special care is
taken to ensure nohz.{needs_update,has_blocked} are set correctly for a
reattempt if the balance_cpu turns bust towards the end of nohz
balancing preserving the current behavior.

Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index ca119c57a2a9..b17861bd684f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -12789,27 +12789,59 @@ static int sched_balance_nohz_idle(int balancing_cpu, unsigned int flags, unsign
 {
 	/* Earliest time when we have to do rebalance again */
 	unsigned long next_balance = start + 60*HZ;
+	struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
 	unsigned int update_flags = 0;
-	int target_cpu;
 
-	/*
-	 * Start with the next CPU after the balancing CPU so we will end with
-	 * balancing CPU and let a chance for other idle cpu to pull load.
-	 */
-	for_each_cpu_wrap(target_cpu, nohz.idle_cpus_mask, balancing_cpu + 1) {
-		if (!idle_cpu(target_cpu))
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(sds, &nohz_shared_list, nohz_list_node) {
+		int target_cpu;
+
+		/* No idle CPUs in this domain */
+		if (!atomic_read(&sds->nr_idle_cpus))
 			continue;
 
-		/*
-		 * If balancing CPU gets work to do, stop the load balancing
-		 * work being done for other CPUs. Next load balancing owner
-		 * will pick it up.
-		 */
-		if (!idle_cpu(balancing_cpu) && need_resched())
-			return -EBUSY;
+		for_each_cpu(target_cpu, sds->nohz_idle_cpus_mask) {
+			/* Deal with the balancing CPU at the end. */
+			if (balancing_cpu == target_cpu)
+				continue;
+
+			if (!idle_cpu(target_cpu))
+				continue;
 
-		update_flags |= sched_balance_idle_rq(cpu_rq(target_cpu), flags, &next_balance);
+			/*
+			 * If balancing CPU gets work to do, stop the load balancing
+			 * work being done for other CPUs. Next load balancing owner
+			 * will pick it up.
+			 */
+			if (!idle_cpu(balancing_cpu) && need_resched()) {
+				rcu_read_unlock();
+				return -EBUSY;
+			}
+
+			update_flags |= sched_balance_idle_rq(cpu_rq(target_cpu),
+						flags, &next_balance);
+		}
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	/*
+	 * If we reach here, all CPUs have been balance and it is time
+	 * to balance the balancing_cpu.
+	 *
+	 * If coincidentally the balancing CPU turns busy at this point
+	 * and is the only nohz idle CPU, we still need to set
+	 * nohz.{needs_update,has_blocked} since the CPU can transition
+	 * back to nohz idle before the tick hits.
+	 *
+	 * In the above case, rq->nohz_tick_stopped is never cleared and
+	 * nohz_balance_enter_idle() skips setting nohz.has_blocked.
+	 * Return -EBUSY instructing the caller to reset the nohz
+	 * signals allowing a reattempt.
+	 */
+	if (!idle_cpu(balancing_cpu) && need_resched())
+		return -EBUSY;
+
+	update_flags |= sched_balance_idle_rq(cpu_rq(balancing_cpu), flags, &next_balance);
 
 	/*
 	 * next_balance will be updated only when there is a need.
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-08  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-08  9:26 [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 00/29] sched/fair: Push-based load balancing K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 01/29] sched/fair: Simplify set_cpu_sd_state_*() with guards K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 02/29] sched/fair: Use rq->nohz_tick_stopped in update_nohz_stats() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 03/29] sched/topology: Optimize sd->shared allocation and assignment K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 04/29] sched/fair: Simplify the entry condition for update_idle_cpu_scan() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 05/29] sched/fair: Simplity SIS_UTIL handling in select_idle_cpu() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 06/29] cpumask: Introduce for_each_cpu_and_wrap() and bitfield helpers K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-12 21:03   ` Yury Norov
2025-12-08  9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 07/29] sched/fair: Use for_each_cpu_and_wrap() in select_idle_capacity() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 08/29] sched/fair: Use for_each_cpu_and_wrap() in select_idle_cpu() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 09/29] sched/fair: Rotate the CPU resposible for busy load balancing K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 10/29] sched/fair: Use xchg() to set sd->nohz_idle state K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 11/29] sched/topology: Attach new hierarchy in rq_attach_root() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 12/29] sched/fair: Fixup sd->nohz_idle state during hotplug / cpuset K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:26 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 13/29] sched/fair: Account idle cpus instead of busy cpus in sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 14/29] sched/topology: Introduce fallback sd->shared assignment K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 15/29] sched/topology: Introduce percpu sd_nohz for nohz state tracking K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 16/29] sched/topology: Introduce "nohz_idle_cpus_mask" in sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 17/29] sched/topology: Introduce "nohz_shared_list" to keep track of sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 18/29] sched/fair: Reorder the barrier in nohz_balance_enter_idle() K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 19/29] sched/fair: Extract the main _nohz_idle_balance() loop into a helper K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 20/29] sched/fair: Convert find_new_ilb() to use nohz_shared_list K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 21/29] sched/fair: Introduce sched_asym_prefer_idle() for ILB kick K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:27 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2025-12-08  9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 23/29] sched/fair: Remove "nohz.idle_cpus_mask" K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 24/29] sched/fair: Optimize global "nohz.nr_cpus" tracking K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 25/29] sched/topology: Add basic debug information for "nohz_shared_list" K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 26/29] [EXPERIMENTAL] sched/fair: Add push task framework K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 27/29] [EXPERIMENTAL] sched/fair: Proactive idle balance using push mechanism K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 28/29] [EXPERIMENTAL] sched/fair: Add a local counter to rate limit task push K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 12:33   ` Christian Loehle
2025-12-08 17:35     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08  9:27 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 29/29] [EXPERIMENTAL] sched/fair: Faster alternate for intra-NUMA newidle balance K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-08 14:04 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 00/29] sched/fair: Push-based load balancing Shrikanth Hegde
2025-12-08 17:36   ` K Prateek Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251208092744.32737-22-kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox