[PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: snps,dw-abp-ssi: Allow up to 16 chip-selects

[PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: snps,dw-abp-ssi: Allow up to 16 chip-selects

[Rob Herring (Arm)]

At least the Microchip Sparx5 supports up to 16 chip-selects, so
increase the maximum. The pattern for the child unit-address was
unconstrained, so update it to match the maximum number of
chip-selects.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
index 5c87fc8a845d..81838577cf9c 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ properties:
   num-cs:
     default: 4
     minimum: 1
-    maximum: 4
+    maximum: 16
 
   dmas:
     items:
@@ -153,14 +153,14 @@ properties:
       provides an interface to override the native DWC SSI CS control.
 
 patternProperties:
-  "@[0-9a-f]+$":
+  "@[0-9a-f]$":
     type: object
     additionalProperties: true
 
     properties:
       reg:
         minimum: 0
-        maximum: 3
+        maximum: 0xf
 
 unevaluatedProperties: false
 
-- 
2.51.0

Re: [PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: snps,dw-abp-ssi: Allow up to 16 chip-selects

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 17:03:22 -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> At least the Microchip Sparx5 supports up to 16 chip-selects, so
> increase the maximum. The pattern for the child unit-address was
> unconstrained, so update it to match the maximum number of
> chip-selects.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: dt-bindings: snps,dw-abp-ssi: Allow up to 16 chip-selects
      commit: 1d24636a9c87c32ec626a56593c98544e6c49fef

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark