From: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stanley Zhang <stazhang@purestorage.com>,
Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/20] blk-integrity: take const pointer in blk_integrity_rq()
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 22:34:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251217053455.281509-4-csander@purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251217053455.281509-1-csander@purestorage.com>
blk_integrity_rq() doesn't modify the struct request passed in, so allow
a const pointer to be passed. Use a matching signature for the
!CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY version.
Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
---
include/linux/blk-integrity.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-integrity.h b/include/linux/blk-integrity.h
index a6b84206eb94..c15b1ac62765 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-integrity.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-integrity.h
@@ -89,11 +89,11 @@ static inline unsigned int bio_integrity_bytes(struct blk_integrity *bi,
unsigned int sectors)
{
return bio_integrity_intervals(bi, sectors) * bi->metadata_size;
}
-static inline bool blk_integrity_rq(struct request *rq)
+static inline bool blk_integrity_rq(const struct request *rq)
{
return rq->cmd_flags & REQ_INTEGRITY;
}
/*
@@ -166,13 +166,13 @@ static inline unsigned int bio_integrity_intervals(struct blk_integrity *bi,
static inline unsigned int bio_integrity_bytes(struct blk_integrity *bi,
unsigned int sectors)
{
return 0;
}
-static inline int blk_integrity_rq(struct request *rq)
+static inline bool blk_integrity_rq(const struct request *rq)
{
- return 0;
+ return false;
}
static inline struct bio_vec rq_integrity_vec(struct request *rq)
{
/* the optimizer will remove all calls to this function */
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-17 5:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-17 5:34 [PATCH 00/20] ublk: add support for integrity data Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 01/20] block: validate pi_offset integrity limit Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-18 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 02/20] block: validate interval_exp " Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-18 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-17 5:34 ` Caleb Sander Mateos [this message]
2025-12-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 03/20] blk-integrity: take const pointer in blk_integrity_rq() Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 04/20] ublk: add integrity UAPI Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-22 14:26 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-22 15:09 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-23 1:51 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 05/20] ublk: move ublk flag check functions earlier Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-22 14:30 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 06/20] ublk: support UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_INTEGRITY in device creation Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-22 14:47 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-22 15:35 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-23 1:58 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 07/20] ublk: set UBLK_IO_F_INTEGRITY in ublksrv_io_desc Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-22 14:48 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 08/20] ublk: add ublk_copy_user_bvec() helper Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-22 14:52 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-22 15:37 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 09/20] ublk: split out ublk_user_copy() helper Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-22 14:58 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 10/20] ublk: inline ublk_check_and_get_req() into ublk_user_copy() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-26 2:10 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 11/20] ublk: move offset check out of __ublk_check_and_get_req() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-26 2:15 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 12/20] ublk: implement integrity user copy Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-26 2:38 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 13/20] ublk: optimize ublk_user_copy() on daemon task Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-26 2:51 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 14/20] selftests: ublk: add utility to get block device metadata size Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 15/20] selftests: ublk: add kublk support for integrity params Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 16/20] selftests: ublk: implement integrity user copy in kublk Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 17/20] selftests: ublk: support non-O_DIRECT backing files Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 18/20] selftests: ublk: add integrity data support to loop target Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 19/20] selftests: ublk: add integrity params test Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 20/20] selftests: ublk: add end-to-end integrity test Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-18 16:54 ` (subset) [PATCH 00/20] ublk: add support for integrity data Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251217053455.281509-4-csander@purestorage.com \
--to=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stazhang@purestorage.com \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox