From: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stanley Zhang <stazhang@purestorage.com>,
Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/20] ublk: support UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_INTEGRITY in device creation
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 22:34:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251217053455.281509-7-csander@purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251217053455.281509-1-csander@purestorage.com>
From: Stanley Zhang <stazhang@purestorage.com>
If the UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_INTEGRITY flag is set, validate the integrity
parameters and apply them to the blk_integrity limits.
UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_INTEGRITY requires CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY=y,
UBLK_F_USER_COPY, and metadata_size > 0. Reuse the block metadata ioctl
LBMD_PI_CAP_* and LBMD_PI_CSUM_* constants from the linux/fs.h UAPI
header for the flags and csum_type field values.
The struct ublk_param_integrity validations are based on the checks in
blk_validate_integrity_limits(). Any invalid parameters should be
rejected before being applied to struct blk_integrity.
Signed-off-by: Stanley Zhang <stazhang@purestorage.com>
[csander: add param validation]
Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 4da5d8ff1e1d..2893a9172220 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -42,10 +42,12 @@
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
#include <linux/task_work.h>
#include <linux/namei.h>
#include <linux/kref.h>
+#include <linux/blk-integrity.h>
+#include <uapi/linux/fs.h>
#include <uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h>
#define UBLK_MINORS (1U << MINORBITS)
#define UBLK_INVALID_BUF_IDX ((u16)-1)
@@ -81,11 +83,12 @@
/* All UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_* should be included here */
#define UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_ALL \
(UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_BASIC | UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_DISCARD | \
UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_DEVT | UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_ZONED | \
- UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_DMA_ALIGN | UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_SEGMENT)
+ UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_DMA_ALIGN | UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_SEGMENT | \
+ UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_INTEGRITY)
struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu {
/*
* Store requests in same batch temporarily for queuing them to
* daemon context.
@@ -613,10 +616,57 @@ static void ublk_dev_param_basic_apply(struct ublk_device *ub)
set_disk_ro(ub->ub_disk, true);
set_capacity(ub->ub_disk, p->dev_sectors);
}
+static int ublk_integrity_flags(u32 flags)
+{
+ int ret_flags = 0;
+
+ if (flags & LBMD_PI_CAP_INTEGRITY) {
+ flags &= ~LBMD_PI_CAP_INTEGRITY;
+ ret_flags |= BLK_INTEGRITY_DEVICE_CAPABLE;
+ }
+ if (flags & LBMD_PI_CAP_REFTAG) {
+ flags &= ~LBMD_PI_CAP_REFTAG;
+ ret_flags |= BLK_INTEGRITY_REF_TAG;
+ }
+ return flags ? -EINVAL : ret_flags;
+}
+
+static int ublk_integrity_pi_tuple_size(u8 csum_type)
+{
+ switch (csum_type) {
+ case LBMD_PI_CSUM_NONE:
+ return 0;
+ case LBMD_PI_CSUM_IP:
+ case LBMD_PI_CSUM_CRC16_T10DIF:
+ return 8;
+ case LBMD_PI_CSUM_CRC64_NVME:
+ return 16;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+}
+
+static enum blk_integrity_checksum ublk_integrity_csum_type(u8 csum_type)
+{
+ switch (csum_type) {
+ case LBMD_PI_CSUM_NONE:
+ return BLK_INTEGRITY_CSUM_NONE;
+ case LBMD_PI_CSUM_IP:
+ return BLK_INTEGRITY_CSUM_IP;
+ case LBMD_PI_CSUM_CRC16_T10DIF:
+ return BLK_INTEGRITY_CSUM_CRC;
+ case LBMD_PI_CSUM_CRC64_NVME:
+ return BLK_INTEGRITY_CSUM_CRC64;
+ default:
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ return BLK_INTEGRITY_CSUM_NONE;
+ }
+}
+
static int ublk_validate_params(const struct ublk_device *ub)
{
/* basic param is the only one which must be set */
if (ub->params.types & UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_BASIC) {
const struct ublk_param_basic *p = &ub->params.basic;
@@ -675,10 +725,35 @@ static int ublk_validate_params(const struct ublk_device *ub)
return -EINVAL;
if (p->max_segment_size < UBLK_MIN_SEGMENT_SIZE)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (ub->params.types & UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_INTEGRITY) {
+ const struct ublk_param_integrity *p = &ub->params.integrity;
+ int pi_tuple_size = ublk_integrity_pi_tuple_size(p->csum_type);
+ int flags = ublk_integrity_flags(p->flags);
+
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (!ublk_dev_support_user_copy(ub))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (flags < 0)
+ return flags;
+ if (pi_tuple_size < 0)
+ return pi_tuple_size;
+ if (!p->metadata_size)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (p->csum_type == LBMD_PI_CSUM_NONE &&
+ (p->flags & LBMD_PI_CAP_REFTAG))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (p->pi_offset + pi_tuple_size > p->metadata_size)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (p->interval_exp < SECTOR_SHIFT ||
+ p->interval_exp > ub->params.basic.logical_bs_shift)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
return 0;
}
static void ublk_apply_params(struct ublk_device *ub)
{
@@ -2901,10 +2976,25 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_start_dev(struct ublk_device *ub,
lim.seg_boundary_mask = ub->params.seg.seg_boundary_mask;
lim.max_segment_size = ub->params.seg.max_segment_size;
lim.max_segments = ub->params.seg.max_segments;
}
+ if (ub->params.types & UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_INTEGRITY) {
+ const struct ublk_param_integrity *p = &ub->params.integrity;
+ int pi_tuple_size = ublk_integrity_pi_tuple_size(p->csum_type);
+
+ lim.integrity = (struct blk_integrity) {
+ .flags = ublk_integrity_flags(p->flags),
+ .csum_type = ublk_integrity_csum_type(p->csum_type),
+ .metadata_size = p->metadata_size,
+ .pi_offset = p->pi_offset,
+ .interval_exp = p->interval_exp,
+ .tag_size = p->tag_size,
+ .pi_tuple_size = pi_tuple_size,
+ };
+ }
+
if (wait_for_completion_interruptible(&ub->completion) != 0)
return -EINTR;
if (ub->ublksrv_tgid != ublksrv_pid)
return -EINVAL;
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-17 5:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-17 5:34 [PATCH 00/20] ublk: add support for integrity data Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 01/20] block: validate pi_offset integrity limit Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-18 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 02/20] block: validate interval_exp " Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-18 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 03/20] blk-integrity: take const pointer in blk_integrity_rq() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-19 14:16 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 04/20] ublk: add integrity UAPI Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-22 14:26 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-22 15:09 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-23 1:51 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 05/20] ublk: move ublk flag check functions earlier Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-22 14:30 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` Caleb Sander Mateos [this message]
2025-12-22 14:47 ` [PATCH 06/20] ublk: support UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_INTEGRITY in device creation Ming Lei
2025-12-22 15:35 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-23 1:58 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 07/20] ublk: set UBLK_IO_F_INTEGRITY in ublksrv_io_desc Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-22 14:48 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 08/20] ublk: add ublk_copy_user_bvec() helper Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-22 14:52 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-22 15:37 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 09/20] ublk: split out ublk_user_copy() helper Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-22 14:58 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 10/20] ublk: inline ublk_check_and_get_req() into ublk_user_copy() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-26 2:10 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 11/20] ublk: move offset check out of __ublk_check_and_get_req() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-26 2:15 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 12/20] ublk: implement integrity user copy Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-26 2:38 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 13/20] ublk: optimize ublk_user_copy() on daemon task Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-26 2:51 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 14/20] selftests: ublk: add utility to get block device metadata size Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 15/20] selftests: ublk: add kublk support for integrity params Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 16/20] selftests: ublk: implement integrity user copy in kublk Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 17/20] selftests: ublk: support non-O_DIRECT backing files Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 18/20] selftests: ublk: add integrity data support to loop target Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 19/20] selftests: ublk: add integrity params test Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17 5:34 ` [PATCH 20/20] selftests: ublk: add end-to-end integrity test Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-18 16:54 ` (subset) [PATCH 00/20] ublk: add support for integrity data Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251217053455.281509-7-csander@purestorage.com \
--to=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stazhang@purestorage.com \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox