public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, luto@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, paulmck@kernel.org, muchun.song@linux.dev,
	bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	clrkwllms@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] smp: Use on-stack cpumask in smp_call_function_many_cond
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 16:55:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260318155552.41ffiYbB@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260318045638.1572777-5-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>

On 2026-03-18 12:56:30 [+0800], Chuyi Zhou wrote:
> This patch use on-stack cpumask to replace percpu cfd cpumask in
> smp_call_function_many_cond(). Note that when both CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
> and PREEMPT_RT are enabled, allocation during preempt-disabled section
> would break RT. Therefore, only do this when CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n.
> This is a preparation for enabling preemption during csd_lock_wait() in
> smp_call_function_many_cond().

You explained why we do this only for !CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK but
failed to explain why we need a function local cpumask. Other than
preparation step. But this allocation looks pointless, let me look
further…

> Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>

Sebastian

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-18 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-18  4:56 [PATCH v3 00/12] Allow preemption during IPI completion waiting to improve real-time performance Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-18  4:56 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] smp: Disable preemption explicitly in __csd_lock_wait Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-18 14:13   ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-18  4:56 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] smp: Enable preemption early in smp_call_function_single Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-18 14:14   ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-19  2:30     ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-18  4:56 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] smp: Remove get_cpu from smp_call_function_any Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-18 14:32   ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-18 15:39     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-18  4:56 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] smp: Use on-stack cpumask in smp_call_function_many_cond Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-18 14:38   ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-18 15:55   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2026-03-19  3:02     ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-18  4:56 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] smp: Free call_function_data via RCU in smpcfd_dead_cpu Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-18 16:19   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-19  7:48     ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-18  4:56 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] smp: Enable preemption early in smp_call_function_many_cond Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-18 16:55   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-19  3:46     ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-18  4:56 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] smp: Remove preempt_disable from smp_call_function Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-18  4:56 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] smp: Remove preempt_disable from on_each_cpu_cond_mask Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-18  4:56 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] scftorture: Remove preempt_disable in scftorture_invoke_one Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-18  4:56 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] x86/mm: Move flush_tlb_info back to the stack Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-18 17:21   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-18 20:24     ` Nadav Amit
2026-03-18 22:28       ` Nadav Amit
2026-03-19  8:49         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-19 10:37           ` Nadav Amit
2026-03-19 10:58             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-19 13:41               ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-19 14:40                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-20 14:33     ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-18  4:56 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] x86/mm: Enable preemption during native_flush_tlb_multi Chuyi Zhou
2026-03-18  4:56 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] x86/mm: Enable preemption during flush_tlb_kernel_range Chuyi Zhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260318155552.41ffiYbB@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=zhouchuyi@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox