* [PATCH 6.19 20/86] workqueue: Add pool_workqueue to pending_pwqs list when unplugging multiple inactive works
2026-04-13 15:59 [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2026-04-13 15:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-13 17:01 ` [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review Ronald Warsow
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2026-04-13 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, Carlos Santa, Ryan Neph,
Lai Jiangshan, Waiman Long, linux-kernel, Matthew Brost,
Tejun Heo
6.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
commit 703ccb63ae9f7444d6ff876d024e17f628103c69 upstream.
In unplug_oldest_pwq(), the first inactive work item on the
pool_workqueue is activated correctly. However, if multiple inactive
works exist on the same pool_workqueue, subsequent works fail to
activate because wq_node_nr_active.pending_pwqs is empty — the list
insertion is skipped when the pool_workqueue is plugged.
Fix this by checking for additional inactive works in
unplug_oldest_pwq() and updating wq_node_nr_active.pending_pwqs
accordingly.
Fixes: 4c065dbce1e8 ("workqueue: Enable unbound cpumask update on ordered workqueues")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Cc: Ryan Neph <ryanneph@google.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1849,8 +1849,20 @@ static void unplug_oldest_pwq(struct wor
raw_spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
if (pwq->plugged) {
pwq->plugged = false;
- if (pwq_activate_first_inactive(pwq, true))
+ if (pwq_activate_first_inactive(pwq, true)) {
+ /*
+ * While plugged, queueing skips activation which
+ * includes bumping the nr_active count and adding the
+ * pwq to nna->pending_pwqs if the count can't be
+ * obtained. We need to restore both for the pwq being
+ * unplugged. The first call activates the first
+ * inactive work item and the second, if there are more
+ * inactive, puts the pwq on pending_pwqs.
+ */
+ pwq_activate_first_inactive(pwq, false);
+
kick_pool(pwq->pool);
+ }
}
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review
2026-04-13 15:59 [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-13 15:59 ` [PATCH 6.19 20/86] workqueue: Add pool_workqueue to pending_pwqs list when unplugging multiple inactive works Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2026-04-13 17:01 ` Ronald Warsow
2026-04-13 17:43 ` Brett A C Sheffield
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Ronald Warsow @ 2026-04-13 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
Hi
no regressions here on x86_64 (Intel 11th Gen. CPU)
Thanks
Tested-by: Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@gmx.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review
2026-04-13 15:59 [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-13 15:59 ` [PATCH 6.19 20/86] workqueue: Add pool_workqueue to pending_pwqs list when unplugging multiple inactive works Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-13 17:01 ` [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review Ronald Warsow
@ 2026-04-13 17:43 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2026-04-13 19:46 ` Florian Fainelli
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Brett A C Sheffield @ 2026-04-13 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr,
Brett A C Sheffield
# Librecast Test Results
020/020 [ OK ] liblcrq
010/010 [ OK ] libmld
120/120 [ OK ] liblibrecast
CPU/kernel: Linux auntie 6.19.13-rc1-g425b22d9f3ed #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Apr 13 17:28:52 -00 2026 x86_64 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review
2026-04-13 15:59 [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-04-13 17:43 ` Brett A C Sheffield
@ 2026-04-13 19:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2026-04-14 7:54 ` Jon Hunter
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2026-04-13 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor,
hargar, broonie, achill, sr
On 4/13/26 08:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.19.13 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:57:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.19.13-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review
2026-04-13 15:59 [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2026-04-13 19:46 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2026-04-14 7:54 ` Jon Hunter
2026-04-14 11:25 ` Ron Economos
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2026-04-14 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr,
linux-tegra, stable
On Mon, 13 Apr 2026 17:59:07 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.19.13 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:57:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.19.13-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.19:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
140 tests: 140 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.19.13-rc1-g425b22d9f3ed
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra234-p3737-0000+p3701-0000,
tegra234-p3768-0000+p3767-0005, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review
2026-04-13 15:59 [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2026-04-14 7:54 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2026-04-14 11:25 ` Ron Economos
2026-04-14 11:26 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2026-04-14 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
On 4/13/26 08:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.19.13 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:57:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.19.13-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review
2026-04-13 15:59 [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2026-04-14 11:25 ` Ron Economos
@ 2026-04-14 11:26 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
2026-04-14 17:42 ` Shuah Khan
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Takeshi Ogasawara @ 2026-04-14 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
Hi Greg
On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 1:07 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.19.13 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:57:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.19.13-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
6.19.13-rc1 tested.
Build successfully completed.
Boot successfully completed.
No dmesg regressions.
Video output normal.
Sound output normal.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen10(Intel i7-1260P(x86_64) arch linux)
[ 0.000000] Linux version 6.19.13-rc1rv-g425b22d9f3ed
(takeshi@ThinkPadX1Gen10J0764) (gcc (GCC) 15.2.1 20260209, GNU ld (GNU
Binutils) 2.46) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Apr 14 19:32:50 JST 2026
Thanks
Tested-by: Takeshi Ogasawara <takeshi.ogasawara@futuring-girl.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review
2026-04-13 15:59 [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2026-04-14 11:26 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
@ 2026-04-14 17:42 ` Shuah Khan
2026-04-14 18:17 ` Mark Brown
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2026-04-14 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr, Shuah Khan
On 4/13/26 09:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.19.13 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:57:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.19.13-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review
2026-04-13 15:59 [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2026-04-14 17:42 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2026-04-14 18:17 ` Mark Brown
2026-04-14 18:21 ` Miguel Ojeda
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2026-04-14 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, achill, sr
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 05:59:07PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.19.13 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review
2026-04-13 15:59 [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2026-04-14 18:17 ` Mark Brown
@ 2026-04-14 18:21 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-04-14 23:34 ` Peter Schneider
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Ojeda @ 2026-04-14 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: achill, akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh,
linux-kernel, linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel,
rwarsow, shuah, sr, stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds,
Miguel Ojeda
On Mon, 13 Apr 2026 17:59:07 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.19.13 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:57:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Boot-tested under QEMU for Rust x86_64, arm64 and riscv64; built-tested
for loongarch64:
Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
(arm 32-bit seems to build-test fine as well. Same for UML x86_64 on
a non-debug configuration.)
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review
2026-04-13 15:59 [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2026-04-14 18:21 ` Miguel Ojeda
@ 2026-04-14 23:34 ` Peter Schneider
2026-04-15 2:19 ` Barry K. Nathan
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2026-04-14 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
Am 13.04.2026 um 17:59 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.19.13 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg oddities or regressions found.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review
2026-04-13 15:59 [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2026-04-14 23:34 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2026-04-15 2:19 ` Barry K. Nathan
2026-04-15 3:47 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2026-04-15 12:26 ` Dileep malepu
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Barry K. Nathan @ 2026-04-15 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
On 4/13/26 08:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.19.13 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:57:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.19.13-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Tested on my amd64 DIY home NAS. Working well, no regressions observed.
Tested-by: Barry K. Nathan <barryn@pobox.com>
--
-Barry K. Nathan <barryn@pobox.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review
2026-04-13 15:59 [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2026-04-15 2:19 ` Barry K. Nathan
@ 2026-04-15 3:47 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2026-04-15 12:26 ` Dileep malepu
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Shung-Hsi Yu @ 2026-04-15 3:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 05:59:07PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.19.13 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:57:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
test_progs, test_progs-no_alu32, test_progs-cpuv4, test_maps,
test_verifier in BPF selftests all passes[1] on x86_64.
Tested-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
1: https://github.com/shunghsiyu/libbpf/actions/runs/24418242274/job/71333106576
[...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review
2026-04-13 15:59 [PATCH 6.19 00/86] 6.19.13-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2026-04-15 3:47 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
@ 2026-04-15 12:26 ` Dileep malepu
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Dileep malepu @ 2026-04-15 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 9:35 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.19.13 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:57:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.19.13-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------
Build and Boot Report 6.19.13-rc1
I built and tested Linux kernel version 6.19.13 using the default configurations
on both x86_64 and arm64 architectures in a virtualized environment.
The kernel compiled successfully on both architectures and booted
without issues.
I did not observe any regressions or new warnings in dmesg during boot.
Kernel version: 6.19.13-rc1
Configurations tested: x86_64_defconfig, defconfig
Architectures tested: x86_64, arm64
Kernel source: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Commit:
Tested-by: Dileep Malepu <dileep.debian@gmail.com>
Best regards,
Dileep Malepu.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread