From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PCI: Introduce pci_dev_suspend_retention_supported() API
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 14:11:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260416191111.GA21551@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260414-l1ss-fix-v1-0-adbb4555b5ab@oss.qualcomm.com>
[+cc Rafael]
On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 09:29:38PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay wrote:
> This series introduces a new PCI API
> pci_dev_suspend_retention_supported() to let the client drivers know
> whether they can expect context retention across suspend/resume or
> not and uses it in the NVMe PCI host driver.
>
> This new API is targeted to abstract the PCI power management
> details away from the client drivers. This is needed because client
> drivers like NVMe make use of APIs such as pm_suspend_via_firmware()
> and decide to keep the device in low power mode if this API returns
> 'false'. But some platforms may have other limitations like in the
> case of Qcom, where if the RC driver removes the resource vote to
> allow the SoC to enter low power mode, it cannot reliably exit the
> L1ss state when the endpoint asserts CLKREQ#. So in this case also,
> the client drivers cannot keep the device in low power state during
> suspend and expect context retention.
I don't know what pm_suspend_via_firmware() means. The kernel-doc
says "platform firmware is going to be invoked at the end of the
system-wide power management transition," but that doesn't say
anything about what firmware might do or what it means to drivers.
Based on d916b1be94b6 ("nvme-pci: use host managed power state for
suspend"), which used it in nvme_suspend(), I guess the assumption is
that pm_suspend_via_firmware() means the device might be put in D3cold
and lose all its internal state, and conversely,
!pm_suspend_via_firmware() means the device will *never* be put in a
low-power state that loses internal state.
> And these limitations may just keep adding in the future. Without a
> unified API, the client drivers have to implement their own logic
> which may cause code duplication and may also lead to drivers
> missing some of the platform limitations.
>
> Once this series gets merged, we can extend this API usage to other
> client drivers as well.
>
> Testing
> =======
>
> This series is tested on Qualcomm Hamoa based Lenovo Thinkpad T14s latop with
> NVMe drive.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Manivannan Sadhasivam (4):
> PCI: Introduce an API to check if RC/platform can retain device context during suspend
> PCI: Indicate context lost if L1ss exit is broken during resume from system suspend
> PCI: qcom: Indicate broken L1ss exit during resume from system suspend
> nvme-pci: Use pci_dev_suspend_retention_supported() API during suspend
>
> drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 11 +++++++++++
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/pci.h | 9 +++++++++
> 4 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 591cd656a1bf5ea94a222af5ef2ee76df029c1d2
> change-id: 20260414-l1ss-fix-6c9cf2451944
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-16 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-14 15:59 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: Introduce pci_dev_suspend_retention_supported() API Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-14 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: Introduce an API to check if RC/platform can retain device context during suspend Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-16 19:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-04-17 11:11 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-04-14 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI: Indicate context lost if L1ss exit is broken during resume from system suspend Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-14 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] PCI: qcom: Indicate broken L1ss exit " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-16 19:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-04-17 12:06 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-04-17 22:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-04-18 5:39 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-04-14 15:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvme-pci: Use pci_dev_suspend_retention_supported() API during suspend Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-16 19:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-04-17 11:04 ` [PATCH 0/4] PCI: Introduce pci_dev_suspend_retention_supported() API Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-04-17 22:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-04-18 5:16 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260416191111.GA21551@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox