From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: Introduce an API to check if RC/platform can retain device context during suspend
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 14:18:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260416191855.GA25147@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260414-l1ss-fix-v1-1-adbb4555b5ab@oss.qualcomm.com>
[+cc Rafael]
On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 09:29:39PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
> Currently, the PCI endpoint drivers like NVMe checks whether the device
> context will be retained or not during system suspend, with the help of
> pm_suspend_via_firmware() API.
>
> But it is possible that the device context might be lost due to some
> platform limitation as well. Having those checks in the endpoint drivers
> will not scale and will cause a lot of code duplication.
>
> So introduce an API that acts as a sole point of truth that the endpoint
> drivers can rely on to check whether they can expect the device context
> to be retained or not.
>
> If the API returns 'false', then the client drivers need to prepare for
> context loss by performing actions such as resetting the device, saving
> the context, shutting it down etc... If it returns 'true', then the drivers
> do not need to perform any special action and can leave the device in
> active state.
>
> Right now, this API only incorporates the pm_suspend_via_firmware() check.
> But will be extended in the future commits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/pci.h | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 8479c2e1f74f..211616467a77 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> #include <asm/dma.h>
> #include <linux/aer.h>
> #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/suspend.h>
> #include "pci.h"
>
> DEFINE_MUTEX(pci_slot_mutex);
> @@ -2900,6 +2901,28 @@ void pci_config_pm_runtime_put(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> pm_runtime_put_sync(parent);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * pci_dev_suspend_retention_supported - Check if the platform can retain the device
> + * context during system suspend
> + * @pdev: PCI device to check
> + *
> + * Returns true if the platform can guarantee to retain the device context,
> + * false otherwise.
> + */
> +bool pci_dev_suspend_retention_supported(struct pci_dev *pdev)
This doesn't seem like the right name. This isn't a property of the
*device*; that's all determined by the PCI spec (devices must retain
all internal state in D0, D1, and D2, they retain it in D3hot if
No_Soft_Reset, and they never do in D3cold).
So this seems like something to do with the *platform* behavior. It
sounds like this is basically a way to learn whether the device might
be put in D3cold on system suspend.
> +{
> + /*
> + * If the platform firmware (like ACPI) is involved at the end of system
> + * suspend, device context may not be retained.
> + */
> + if (pm_suspend_via_firmware())
> + return false;
> +
> + /* Assume that the context is retained by default */
> + return true;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_dev_suspend_retention_supported);
> +
> static const struct dmi_system_id bridge_d3_blacklist[] = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> {
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 1c270f1d5123..d9bc7ad4eaa4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -2080,6 +2080,8 @@ pci_release_mem_regions(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> pci_select_bars(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM));
> }
>
> +bool pci_dev_suspend_retention_supported(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> +
> #else /* CONFIG_PCI is not enabled */
>
> static inline void pci_set_flags(int flags) { }
> @@ -2239,6 +2241,11 @@ pci_alloc_irq_vectors(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs,
> static inline void pci_free_irq_vectors(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> }
> +
> +static inline bool pci_dev_suspend_retention_supported(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + return true;
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI */
>
> /* Include architecture-dependent settings and functions */
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-16 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-14 15:59 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: Introduce pci_dev_suspend_retention_supported() API Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-14 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: Introduce an API to check if RC/platform can retain device context during suspend Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-16 19:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-04-17 11:11 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-04-14 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI: Indicate context lost if L1ss exit is broken during resume from system suspend Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-14 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] PCI: qcom: Indicate broken L1ss exit " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-16 19:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-04-17 12:06 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-04-17 22:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-04-18 5:39 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-04-14 15:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvme-pci: Use pci_dev_suspend_retention_supported() API during suspend Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-16 19:11 ` [PATCH 0/4] PCI: Introduce pci_dev_suspend_retention_supported() API Bjorn Helgaas
2026-04-17 11:04 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-04-17 22:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-04-18 5:16 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260416191855.GA25147@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox