public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
To: Olivia Mackall <olivia@selenic.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data()
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 11:06:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260418150613.3522589-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260418000020.1847122-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com>

random_recv_done() stores the device-reported used.len directly into
vi->data_avail.  copy_data() then indexes vi->data[] using
vi->data_idx (advanced by previous copy_data() calls) and issues a
memcpy() without re-validating either value against the posted
buffer size sizeof(vi->data) (SMP_CACHE_BYTES bytes, typically 32
or 64).

A malicious or buggy virtio-rng backend can set used.len beyond
sizeof(vi->data), steering the memcpy() past the end of the inline
array into adjacent kmalloc-1k slab bytes.  hwrng_fillfn() mixes
those bytes into the guest RNG, and guest root can also observe
them directly via /dev/hwrng.

Concrete impact is inside the guest:

 - Memory-safety / hardening: any virtio-rng backend that
   over-reports used.len causes the driver to read past vi->data
   into unrelated slab contents.  hwrng_fillfn() is a kernel thread
   that runs as soon as the device is probed; no guest userspace
   interaction is required to first-trigger the OOB.

 - Cross-boundary leak (confidential-compute threat model): a
   malicious hypervisor cooperating with a malicious or compromised
   guest root userspace can use /dev/hwrng as a leak channel for
   guest-kernel heap data.  The host sets a large used.len, guest
   root reads /dev/hwrng, and the returned bytes contain guest
   kernel slab contents that were adjacent to vi->data.  In
   practice, confidential-compute guests (SEV-SNP, TDX) usually
   disable virtio-rng entirely, so this path is narrow, but the
   fix is still worth carrying because the underlying
   memory-safety bug contaminates the guest RNG on any host.

KASAN confirms the OOB on a guest booted under a QEMU 9.0 whose
virtio-rng backend has been patched to report used.len = 0x10000:

  BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in virtio_read+0x394/0x5d0
  Read of size 64 at addr ffff8880089c2220 by task hwrng/52
  Call Trace:
   __asan_memcpy
   virtio_read+0x394/0x5d0
   hwrng_fillfn+0xb2/0x470
   kthread
  Allocated by task 1:
   probe_common+0xa5/0x660
   virtio_dev_probe+0x549/0xbc0
  The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8880089c2000
   which belongs to the cache kmalloc-1k of size 1024
  The buggy address is located 0 bytes to the right of
   allocated 544-byte region [ffff8880089c2000, ffff8880089c2220)

Same class of bug as commit c04db81cd028 ("net/9p: Fix buffer
overflow in USB transport layer"), which hardened
usb9pfs_rx_complete() against unchecked device-reported length in
the USB 9p transport.

With the clamp at point of use and array_index_nospec() in place,
the same harness boots cleanly: copy_data() returns zero for the
bogus report, the device-supplied bytes after data_idx are
discarded, and the driver issues a fresh request.

Changes in v2 (per Michael S. Tsirkin review):
- move the bound check from random_recv_done() into copy_data(),
  so the clamp sits immediately next to the memcpy it protects
- clamp to sizeof(vi->data) rather than substituting len = 0, so a
  previously-working but buggy device that occasionally over-reports
  used.len does not start returning zero-length reads
- add array_index_nospec() on vi->data_idx to defeat a speculative
  out-of-bounds read given the malicious-backend threat model
- expand the commit message to describe the /dev/hwrng observation
  path and the hypervisor + guest-root cooperation scenario

Fixes: f7f510ec1957 ("virtio: An entropy device, as suggested by hpa.")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-7
---
 drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
index 0ce02d7e5048..5e83ffa105e4 100644
--- a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
+++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 #include <asm/barrier.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/hw_random.h>
+#include <linux/nospec.h>
 #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/virtio.h>
@@ -69,8 +70,26 @@ static void request_entropy(struct virtrng_info *vi)
 static unsigned int copy_data(struct virtrng_info *vi, void *buf,
 			      unsigned int size)
 {
-	size = min_t(unsigned int, size, vi->data_avail);
-	memcpy(buf, vi->data + vi->data_idx, size);
+	unsigned int idx, avail;
+
+	/*
+	 * vi->data_avail was set from the device-reported used.len and
+	 * vi->data_idx was advanced by previous copy_data() calls.  A
+	 * malicious or buggy virtio-rng backend can drive either past
+	 * sizeof(vi->data).  Clamp at point of use and harden the index
+	 * with array_index_nospec() so the memcpy() below cannot be
+	 * steered into adjacent slab memory, including under
+	 * speculation.
+	 */
+	avail = min_t(unsigned int, vi->data_avail, sizeof(vi->data));
+	if (vi->data_idx >= avail) {
+		vi->data_avail = 0;
+		request_entropy(vi);
+		return 0;
+	}
+	size = min_t(unsigned int, size, avail - vi->data_idx);
+	idx = array_index_nospec(vi->data_idx, sizeof(vi->data));
+	memcpy(buf, vi->data + idx, size);
 	vi->data_idx += size;
 	vi->data_avail -= size;
 	if (vi->data_avail == 0)
-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-18 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-18  0:00 [PATCH] hwrng: virtio: reject invalid used.len from the device Michael Bommarito
2026-04-18  0:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-18  0:18   ` Michael Bommarito
2026-04-18  0:31     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-18  0:47       ` Michael Bommarito
2026-04-18 12:11         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-18 15:06 ` Michael Bommarito [this message]
2026-04-18 17:18   ` [PATCH v2] hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-18 17:25     ` Michael Bommarito
2026-04-18 17:38       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-18 17:56         ` Michael Bommarito

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260418150613.3522589-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
    --to=michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=olivia@selenic.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox