From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
"Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Kurmi, Suresh Kumar" <suresh.kumar.kurmi@intel.com>,
"Saarinen, Jani" <jani.saarinen@intel.com>,
ravitejax.veesam@intel.com
Subject: Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20260324 )
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 17:03:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260421150307.GE1064669@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aeeNbseIzGwussm0@casper.infradead.org>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 03:45:02PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 04:37:52PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Argh, I see... yes. Perhaps something like the below though?
>
> This is a documentation bug. I thought it was supposed to add *after*
> pos, not before. So can we clear that up too?
Sure, that comment is indeed less than clear. The comment in
__ww_mutex_add_waiter() is better.
>
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static inline void __mutex_clear_flag(struct mutex *lock, unsigned long flag)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Add @waiter to a given location in the lock wait_list and set the
> + * Add @waiter before a given location in the lock wait_list and set the
> * FLAG_WAITERS flag if it's the first waiter.
> */
> static void
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-21 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-27 13:39 Regression on linux-next (next-20260324 ) Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-03-27 16:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-27 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-30 8:26 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-03-30 19:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-20 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-21 6:45 ` John Stultz
2026-04-21 10:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-21 12:54 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-21 14:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-21 14:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-21 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-04-21 15:48 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-21 17:29 ` John Stultz
2026-04-21 20:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-21 14:31 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260421150307.GE1064669@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.saarinen@intel.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ravitejax.veesam@intel.com \
--cc=suresh.kumar.kurmi@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox