From: Kaitao cheng <kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>
To: martin.lau@linux.dev, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, chengkaitao@kylinos.cn,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v10 1/8] bpf: refactor __bpf_list_del to take list node pointer
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:58:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260427165906.84420-2-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260427165906.84420-1-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>
From: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
Refactor __bpf_list_del to accept (head, struct list_head *n) instead of
(head, bool tail). The caller now passes the specific node to remove:
bpf_list_pop_front passes h->next, bpf_list_pop_back passes h->prev.
Prepares for introducing bpf_list_del(head, node) kfunc to remove an
arbitrary node when the user holds ownership.
Signed-off-by: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
---
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index baa12b24bb64..9cd7b028592c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -2550,22 +2550,24 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_push_back_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head,
return bpf_list_push_back(head, node, meta__ign, off);
}
-static struct bpf_list_node *__bpf_list_del(struct bpf_list_head *head, bool tail)
+static struct bpf_list_node *__bpf_list_del(struct bpf_list_head *head,
+ struct list_head *n)
{
- struct list_head *n, *h = (void *)head;
+ struct list_head *h = (void *)head;
struct bpf_list_node_kern *node;
/* If list_head was 0-initialized by map, bpf_obj_init_field wasn't
* called on its fields, so init here
*/
- if (unlikely(!h->next))
+ if (unlikely(!h->next)) {
INIT_LIST_HEAD(h);
+ return NULL;
+ }
if (list_empty(h))
return NULL;
- n = tail ? h->prev : h->next;
node = container_of(n, struct bpf_list_node_kern, list_head);
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(READ_ONCE(node->owner) != head))
+ if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(node->owner) != head))
return NULL;
list_del_init(n);
@@ -2575,12 +2577,16 @@ static struct bpf_list_node *__bpf_list_del(struct bpf_list_head *head, bool tai
__bpf_kfunc struct bpf_list_node *bpf_list_pop_front(struct bpf_list_head *head)
{
- return __bpf_list_del(head, false);
+ struct list_head *h = (void *)head;
+
+ return __bpf_list_del(head, h->next);
}
__bpf_kfunc struct bpf_list_node *bpf_list_pop_back(struct bpf_list_head *head)
{
- return __bpf_list_del(head, true);
+ struct list_head *h = (void *)head;
+
+ return __bpf_list_del(head, h->prev);
}
__bpf_kfunc struct bpf_list_node *bpf_list_front(struct bpf_list_head *head)
--
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-27 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 16:58 [PATCH bpf-next v10 0/8] bpf: Extend the bpf_list family of APIs Kaitao cheng
2026-04-27 16:58 ` Kaitao cheng [this message]
2026-04-27 18:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 1/8] bpf: refactor __bpf_list_del to take list node pointer bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-28 13:52 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-04-27 16:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 2/8] bpf: clear list node owner and unlink before drop Kaitao cheng
2026-04-27 18:43 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-28 14:08 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-04-27 16:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 3/8] bpf: Introduce the bpf_list_del kfunc Kaitao cheng
2026-04-27 18:43 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-28 14:32 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-04-27 16:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 4/8] bpf: refactor __bpf_list_add to take insertion point via **prev_ptr Kaitao cheng
2026-04-27 16:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 5/8] bpf: Add bpf_list_add to insert node after a given list node Kaitao cheng
2026-04-27 18:43 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-28 14:18 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-04-27 16:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 6/8] bpf: add bpf_list_is_first/last/empty kfuncs Kaitao cheng
2026-04-27 16:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 7/8] bpf: allow non-owning list-node args via __nonown_allowed Kaitao cheng
2026-04-27 16:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add test cases for bpf_list_del/add/is_first/is_last/empty Kaitao cheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260427165906.84420-2-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev \
--to=kaitao.cheng@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chengkaitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox