public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
	Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>,
	Felix Abecassis <fabecassis@nvidia.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Drop redundant RCU read lock in NOHZ kick path
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:41:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260428144352.3575863-2-arighi@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260428144352.3575863-1-arighi@nvidia.com>

nohz_balancer_kick() is reached from sched_balance_trigger(), which is
called from sched_tick(). sched_tick() runs with IRQs disabled, so the
additional rcu_read_lock/unlock() used around sched_domain accesses in
this path is redundant. Rely on the existing IRQ-disabled context (and
the rcu_dereference_all() checking) instead.

No functional change intended.

Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 40 ++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 69361c63353ad..e0f75dedc8456 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -12749,8 +12749,6 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
-
 	sd = rcu_dereference_all(rq->sd);
 	if (sd) {
 		/*
@@ -12758,8 +12756,8 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 		 * capacity, kick the ILB to see if there's a better CPU to run on:
 		 */
 		if (rq->cfs.h_nr_runnable >= 1 && check_cpu_capacity(rq, sd)) {
-			flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
-			goto unlock;
+			flags |= NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
+			goto out;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -12775,8 +12773,8 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 		 */
 		for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), nohz.idle_cpus_mask) {
 			if (sched_asym(sd, i, cpu)) {
-				flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
-				goto unlock;
+				flags |= NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
+				goto out;
 			}
 		}
 	}
@@ -12787,10 +12785,8 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 		 * When ASYM_CPUCAPACITY; see if there's a higher capacity CPU
 		 * to run the misfit task on.
 		 */
-		if (check_misfit_status(rq)) {
-			flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
-			goto unlock;
-		}
+		if (check_misfit_status(rq))
+			flags |= NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
 
 		/*
 		 * For asymmetric systems, we do not want to nicely balance
@@ -12799,10 +12795,10 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 		 *
 		 * Skip the LLC logic because it's not relevant in that case.
 		 */
-		goto unlock;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
-	sds = rcu_dereference_all(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
+	sds = rcu_dereference_all(per_cpu(sd_balance_shared, cpu));
 	if (sds) {
 		/*
 		 * If there is an imbalance between LLC domains (IOW we could
@@ -12814,13 +12810,9 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 		 * like this LLC domain has tasks we could move.
 		 */
 		nr_busy = atomic_read(&sds->nr_busy_cpus);
-		if (nr_busy > 1) {
-			flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
-			goto unlock;
-		}
+		if (nr_busy > 1)
+			flags |= NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
 	}
-unlock:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 out:
 	if (READ_ONCE(nohz.needs_update))
 		flags |= NOHZ_NEXT_KICK;
@@ -12832,17 +12824,13 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 static void set_cpu_sd_state_busy(int cpu)
 {
 	struct sched_domain *sd;
-
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	sd = rcu_dereference_all(per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu));
 
 	if (!sd || !sd->nohz_idle)
-		goto unlock;
+		return;
 	sd->nohz_idle = 0;
 
 	atomic_inc(&sd->shared->nr_busy_cpus);
-unlock:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 void nohz_balance_exit_idle(struct rq *rq)
@@ -12861,17 +12849,13 @@ void nohz_balance_exit_idle(struct rq *rq)
 static void set_cpu_sd_state_idle(int cpu)
 {
 	struct sched_domain *sd;
-
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	sd = rcu_dereference_all(per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu));
 
 	if (!sd || sd->nohz_idle)
-		goto unlock;
+		return;
 	sd->nohz_idle = 1;
 
 	atomic_dec(&sd->shared->nr_busy_cpus);
-unlock:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.54.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-28 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-28 14:41 [PATCH v5 0/5] sched/fair: SMT-aware asymmetric CPU capacity Andrea Righi
2026-04-28 14:41 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-04-28 16:29   ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Drop redundant RCU read lock in NOHZ kick path K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-29 16:07     ` [PATCH v2 " Andrea Righi
2026-05-05  9:15   ` [PATCH " Dietmar Eggemann
2026-05-05  9:22     ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-28 14:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Attach sched_domain_shared to sd_asym_cpucapacity Andrea Righi
2026-05-05 12:48   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-04-28 14:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Prefer fully-idle SMT cores in asym-capacity idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-05-05 17:20   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-04-28 14:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Reject misfit pulls onto busy SMT siblings on asym-capacity Andrea Righi
2026-04-28 14:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Add SIS_UTIL support to select_idle_capacity() Andrea Righi
2026-05-05 20:40 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] sched/fair: SMT-aware asymmetric CPU capacity Dietmar Eggemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260428144352.3575863-2-arighi@nvidia.com \
    --to=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=fabecassis@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox