From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>,
Felix Abecassis <fabecassis@nvidia.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Drop redundant RCU read lock in NOHZ kick path
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:41:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260428144352.3575863-2-arighi@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260428144352.3575863-1-arighi@nvidia.com>
nohz_balancer_kick() is reached from sched_balance_trigger(), which is
called from sched_tick(). sched_tick() runs with IRQs disabled, so the
additional rcu_read_lock/unlock() used around sched_domain accesses in
this path is redundant. Rely on the existing IRQ-disabled context (and
the rcu_dereference_all() checking) instead.
No functional change intended.
Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 40 ++++++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 69361c63353ad..e0f75dedc8456 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -12749,8 +12749,6 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
goto out;
}
- rcu_read_lock();
-
sd = rcu_dereference_all(rq->sd);
if (sd) {
/*
@@ -12758,8 +12756,8 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
* capacity, kick the ILB to see if there's a better CPU to run on:
*/
if (rq->cfs.h_nr_runnable >= 1 && check_cpu_capacity(rq, sd)) {
- flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
- goto unlock;
+ flags |= NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
+ goto out;
}
}
@@ -12775,8 +12773,8 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
*/
for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), nohz.idle_cpus_mask) {
if (sched_asym(sd, i, cpu)) {
- flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
- goto unlock;
+ flags |= NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
+ goto out;
}
}
}
@@ -12787,10 +12785,8 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
* When ASYM_CPUCAPACITY; see if there's a higher capacity CPU
* to run the misfit task on.
*/
- if (check_misfit_status(rq)) {
- flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
- goto unlock;
- }
+ if (check_misfit_status(rq))
+ flags |= NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
/*
* For asymmetric systems, we do not want to nicely balance
@@ -12799,10 +12795,10 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
*
* Skip the LLC logic because it's not relevant in that case.
*/
- goto unlock;
+ goto out;
}
- sds = rcu_dereference_all(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
+ sds = rcu_dereference_all(per_cpu(sd_balance_shared, cpu));
if (sds) {
/*
* If there is an imbalance between LLC domains (IOW we could
@@ -12814,13 +12810,9 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
* like this LLC domain has tasks we could move.
*/
nr_busy = atomic_read(&sds->nr_busy_cpus);
- if (nr_busy > 1) {
- flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
- goto unlock;
- }
+ if (nr_busy > 1)
+ flags |= NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
}
-unlock:
- rcu_read_unlock();
out:
if (READ_ONCE(nohz.needs_update))
flags |= NOHZ_NEXT_KICK;
@@ -12832,17 +12824,13 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
static void set_cpu_sd_state_busy(int cpu)
{
struct sched_domain *sd;
-
- rcu_read_lock();
sd = rcu_dereference_all(per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu));
if (!sd || !sd->nohz_idle)
- goto unlock;
+ return;
sd->nohz_idle = 0;
atomic_inc(&sd->shared->nr_busy_cpus);
-unlock:
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
void nohz_balance_exit_idle(struct rq *rq)
@@ -12861,17 +12849,13 @@ void nohz_balance_exit_idle(struct rq *rq)
static void set_cpu_sd_state_idle(int cpu)
{
struct sched_domain *sd;
-
- rcu_read_lock();
sd = rcu_dereference_all(per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu));
if (!sd || sd->nohz_idle)
- goto unlock;
+ return;
sd->nohz_idle = 1;
atomic_dec(&sd->shared->nr_busy_cpus);
-unlock:
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
/*
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-28 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-28 14:41 [PATCH v5 0/5] sched/fair: SMT-aware asymmetric CPU capacity Andrea Righi
2026-04-28 14:41 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-04-28 16:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Drop redundant RCU read lock in NOHZ kick path K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 " Andrea Righi
2026-05-05 9:15 ` [PATCH " Dietmar Eggemann
2026-05-05 9:22 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-28 14:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Attach sched_domain_shared to sd_asym_cpucapacity Andrea Righi
2026-05-05 12:48 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-04-28 14:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Prefer fully-idle SMT cores in asym-capacity idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-05-05 17:20 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-04-28 14:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Reject misfit pulls onto busy SMT siblings on asym-capacity Andrea Righi
2026-04-28 14:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Add SIS_UTIL support to select_idle_capacity() Andrea Righi
2026-05-05 20:40 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] sched/fair: SMT-aware asymmetric CPU capacity Dietmar Eggemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260428144352.3575863-2-arighi@nvidia.com \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=fabecassis@nvidia.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox