From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
ricardo.neri@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/fair: Check CPU capacity before comparing group types during load balance
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:19:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260429-rneri-fix-cas-clusters-v2-1-cd787de35cc6@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260429-rneri-fix-cas-clusters-v2-0-cd787de35cc6@linux.intel.com>
update_sd_pick_busiest() may incorrectly select a fully_busy group as the
busiest group when its per-CPU capacity exceeds that of the destination
CPU. This happens because the type of busiest group is initialized to
group_has_spare and allows the fully_busy group to win the type comparison.
update_sd_pick_busiest() should not choose a candidate scheduling group
with at most one runnable task if its per-CPU capacity is greater than that
of the destination CPU. Such a check already exists, but it is done too
late: after the type comparison, preventing a subsequent fully_busy group
of equal per-CPU capacity from being correctly selected.
Move this check to occur before comparing group types.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
---
Changes since v1:
* Added a note clarifying that SMT and SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY are mutually
exclusive. (Tim)
* Kept parentheses around bitwise operators for clarity.
* Rewrote patch description for clarity.
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 728965851842..0dbed82aa63f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -10788,6 +10788,20 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
sds->local_stat.group_type != group_has_spare))
return false;
+ /*
+ * Candidate sg has no more than one task per CPU and has higher
+ * per-CPU capacity. Migrating tasks to less capable CPUs may harm
+ * throughput. Maximize throughput, power/energy consequences are not
+ * considered.
+ *
+ * Systems with SMT are unaffected, as asymmetric capacity is not set
+ * in such case.
+ */
+ if ((env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY) &&
+ (sgs->group_type <= group_fully_busy) &&
+ (capacity_greater(sg->sgc->min_capacity, capacity_of(env->dst_cpu))))
+ return false;
+
if (sgs->group_type > busiest->group_type)
return true;
@@ -10890,17 +10904,6 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
break;
}
- /*
- * Candidate sg has no more than one task per CPU and has higher
- * per-CPU capacity. Migrating tasks to less capable CPUs may harm
- * throughput. Maximize throughput, power/energy consequences are not
- * considered.
- */
- if ((env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY) &&
- (sgs->group_type <= group_fully_busy) &&
- (capacity_greater(sg->sgc->min_capacity, capacity_of(env->dst_cpu))))
- return false;
-
return true;
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-29 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-29 21:19 [PATCH v2 0/4] sched: Fix cluster scheduling in the presence of asymmetric capacity Ricardo Neri
2026-04-29 21:19 ` Ricardo Neri [this message]
2026-05-06 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/fair: Check CPU capacity before comparing group types during load balance Christian Loehle
2026-05-06 23:45 ` Ricardo Neri
2026-04-29 21:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] sched/fair: Skip misfit load accounting when the destination CPU cannot help Ricardo Neri
2026-05-06 11:39 ` Christian Loehle
2026-05-06 23:47 ` Ricardo Neri
2026-04-29 21:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] sched/fair: Allow load balancing between CPUs of identical capacity Ricardo Neri
2026-05-06 13:10 ` Christian Loehle
2026-04-29 21:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] sched/topology: Do not clear SD_PREFER_SIBLING in domains with clusters Ricardo Neri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260429-rneri-fix-cas-clusters-v2-1-cd787de35cc6@linux.intel.com \
--to=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox