From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
To: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
ricardo.neri@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] sched/fair: Skip misfit load accounting when the destination CPU cannot help
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 12:39:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <70613a6c-0a02-41c1-a70d-66fa8e40763b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260429-rneri-fix-cas-clusters-v2-2-cd787de35cc6@linux.intel.com>
On 4/29/26 22:19, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> In domains with asymmetric capacity, identifying misfit load in a
> scheduling group is not useful when the destination CPU cannot help (i.e.,
> its capacity exceeds the group's maximum CPU capacity by less than ~5%). In
> such cases, it also prevents load balance among clusters of equal capacity
> when CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER is enabled. This happens because
> update_sd_pick_busiest() skips candidate groups of type misfit_task if the
> destination CPU has similar capacity.
>
> Skipping misfit load accounting in this situation allows the group to be
> classified as has_spare or fully_busy and lets load balancing proceed. Keep
> marking scheduling groups as overloaded when misfit tasks are present. This
> flag propagates to the root domain and allows bigger CPUs in it to help
> via newly idle balance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> * Moved the check of the destination CPU capacity inside the code block
> used for SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY. v1 inadvertedly broke the mutual
> exclusion of the sched_reduced_capacity() path.
> * Keep marking the root domain as overloaded to allow bigger CPUs to
> help. (sashiko)
> * Fixed patch description to clarify that the capacity_greater() looks
> differences of 5% or more. (Christian)
> * Reworded the patch description for clarity.
> * I did not include the Reviewed-by tag from Christian since the patch
> changed functionally.
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 0dbed82aa63f..166a5b109e0e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -10719,10 +10719,24 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
> continue;
>
> if (sd_flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY) {
> - /* Check for a misfit task on the cpu */
> - if (sgs->group_misfit_task_load < rq->misfit_task_load) {
> - sgs->group_misfit_task_load = rq->misfit_task_load;
> + if (rq->misfit_task_load) {
> + /*
> + * Always mark the domain overloaded so big CPUs
> + * can pick up misfit tasks via newly idle
> + * balance.
> + */
> *sg_overloaded = 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * Only account misfit load if @dst_cpu can
> + * help, otherwise the group may be classified
> + * as misfit_task and update_sd_pick_busiest()
> + * will skip it.
> + */
> + if (capacity_greater(capacity_of(env->dst_cpu),
> + group->sgc->max_capacity) &&
> + (sgs->group_misfit_task_load < rq->misfit_task_load))
> + sgs->group_misfit_task_load = rq->misfit_task_load;
> }
> } else if (env->idle && sched_reduced_capacity(rq, env->sd)) {
> /* Check for a task running on a CPU with reduced capacity */
>
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-29 21:19 [PATCH v2 0/4] sched: Fix cluster scheduling in the presence of asymmetric capacity Ricardo Neri
2026-04-29 21:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/fair: Check CPU capacity before comparing group types during load balance Ricardo Neri
2026-05-06 10:38 ` Christian Loehle
2026-05-06 23:45 ` Ricardo Neri
2026-04-29 21:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] sched/fair: Skip misfit load accounting when the destination CPU cannot help Ricardo Neri
2026-05-06 11:39 ` Christian Loehle [this message]
2026-05-06 23:47 ` Ricardo Neri
2026-04-29 21:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] sched/fair: Allow load balancing between CPUs of identical capacity Ricardo Neri
2026-05-06 13:10 ` Christian Loehle
2026-04-29 21:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] sched/topology: Do not clear SD_PREFER_SIBLING in domains with clusters Ricardo Neri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=70613a6c-0a02-41c1-a70d-66fa8e40763b@arm.com \
--to=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox