From: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
Yixun Lan <dlan@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, spacemit@lists.linux.dev,
jinmei.wei@spacemit.com,
Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: soc-pcm: constrain hw_params when DAIs share the same BCLK
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 15:46:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260430-i2s-same-blk-v1-2-3a1f04eb6159@linux.spacemit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430-i2s-same-blk-v1-0-3a1f04eb6159@linux.spacemit.com>
When multiple CPU DAIs on the same sound card share the same physical
BCLK, add a hw_rule during PCM open that constrains the sample rate so
the resulting BCLK rate stays consistent across all sharing DAIs.
The hw_rule is registered unconditionally for every DAI that has a bclk
clock pointer set. The actual peer scanning happens inside the rule
callback at hw_refine time: it walks all DAIs on the card, looking for
an active peer that shares the same physical BCLK (via clk_is_match())
and has already completed hw_params (checked via dai->symmetric_rate
!= 0). This ensures the constraint uses the real BCLK rate established
by the peer's clk_set_rate() in hw_params, not a stale boot-time
default.
The first DAI to complete hw_params is unconstrained (no active peer
yet); subsequent DAIs are constrained to match.
The rule supports two modes:
- If the DAI has an explicit bclk_ratio set (e.g. for TDM where
BCLK = rate * slots * slot_width), the rate is constrained to
active_bclk_rate / bclk_ratio.
- Otherwise, the default formula BCLK = rate * channels * sample_bits
is used to derive the valid rate range.
The constraint is purely additive: DAIs that do not set a bclk clock
pointer are completely unaffected.
Signed-off-by: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>
---
sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 113 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
index 9b12eedb77c3..31f48795a653 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -467,6 +468,111 @@ static int soc_pcm_apply_symmetry(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * Shared BCLK constraint: when multiple DAIs share the same physical BCLK,
+ * constrain hw_params so that the BCLK rate (rate * channels * sample_bits,
+ * or rate * slots * slot_width for TDM) remains consistent.
+ */
+
+static int soc_pcm_shared_bclk_rule_rate(struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
+ struct snd_pcm_hw_rule *rule)
+{
+ struct snd_soc_dai *dai = rule->private;
+ struct snd_soc_card *card = dai->component->card;
+ struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd;
+ struct snd_soc_dai *other_dai;
+ unsigned long active_bclk_rate = 0;
+ struct snd_interval *rate = hw_param_interval(params, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE);
+ struct snd_interval constraint = { .empty = 1 };
+ unsigned int target_rate;
+ int i;
+
+ /* Scan all DAIs on the card for an active peer sharing the same BCLK */
+ for_each_card_rtds(card, rtd) {
+ for_each_rtd_cpu_dais(rtd, i, other_dai) {
+ if (other_dai == dai)
+ continue;
+ if (!other_dai->bclk)
+ continue;
+ if (!snd_soc_dai_active(other_dai))
+ continue;
+ /*
+ * Skip peers whose hw_params hasn't run yet.
+ * symmetric_rate is set by soc_pcm_set_dai_params()
+ * after snd_soc_dai_hw_params(), so non-zero means
+ * the DAI's clk_set_rate() has already executed.
+ */
+ if (!other_dai->symmetric_rate)
+ continue;
+ if (!clk_is_match(dai->bclk, other_dai->bclk))
+ continue;
+
+ active_bclk_rate = clk_get_rate(other_dai->bclk);
+ if (active_bclk_rate)
+ goto found;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+found:
+ if (dai->bclk_ratio) {
+ /*
+ * Driver has set an explicit BCLK ratio (e.g. for TDM where
+ * BCLK = rate * slots * slot_width). The only valid rate is
+ * active_bclk_rate / bclk_ratio.
+ */
+ target_rate = active_bclk_rate / dai->bclk_ratio;
+
+ constraint.min = target_rate;
+ constraint.max = target_rate;
+ } else {
+ struct snd_interval *channels = hw_param_interval(params,
+ SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_CHANNELS);
+ struct snd_interval *sample_bits = hw_param_interval(params,
+ SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_SAMPLE_BITS);
+
+ /*
+ * Default: BCLK = rate * channels * sample_bits.
+ * Calculate the range of valid rates given the current
+ * channel and sample_bits intervals.
+ */
+ if (!channels->min || !sample_bits->min)
+ return 0;
+
+ constraint.max = active_bclk_rate /
+ ((unsigned long)channels->min * sample_bits->min);
+
+ if (channels->max && sample_bits->max)
+ constraint.min = active_bclk_rate /
+ ((unsigned long)channels->max * sample_bits->max);
+ else
+ constraint.min = constraint.max;
+ }
+
+ constraint.integer = 1;
+ constraint.empty = 0;
+
+ return snd_interval_refine(rate, &constraint);
+}
+
+static int soc_pcm_apply_shared_bclk(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
+ struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
+{
+ if (!dai->bclk)
+ return 0;
+
+ dev_dbg(dai->dev,
+ "ASoC: registering shared BCLK rate constraint\n");
+
+ return snd_pcm_hw_rule_add(substream->runtime, 0,
+ SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE,
+ soc_pcm_shared_bclk_rule_rate, dai,
+ SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_CHANNELS,
+ SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_SAMPLE_BITS,
+ -1);
+}
+
static int soc_pcm_params_symmetry(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params)
{
@@ -903,6 +1009,13 @@ static int __soc_pcm_open(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd,
if (ret != 0)
goto err;
}
+
+ /* Shared BCLK constraint across DAIs on the same card */
+ for_each_rtd_cpu_dais(rtd, i, dai) {
+ ret = soc_pcm_apply_shared_bclk(substream, dai);
+ if (ret != 0)
+ goto err;
+ }
dynamic:
snd_soc_runtime_activate(rtd, substream->stream);
ret = 0;
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 7:46 [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: add shared BCLK rate constraint for cross-DAI coordination Troy Mitchell
2026-04-30 7:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: soc-dai: add shared BCLK clock for cross-DAI rate constraints Troy Mitchell
2026-04-30 12:01 ` Mark Brown
2026-04-30 7:46 ` Troy Mitchell [this message]
2026-04-30 12:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: soc-pcm: constrain hw_params when DAIs share the same BCLK Mark Brown
2026-04-30 7:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: spacemit: declare shared BCLK for cross-DAI rate constraint Troy Mitchell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260430-i2s-same-blk-v1-2-3a1f04eb6159@linux.spacemit.com \
--to=troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dlan@kernel.org \
--cc=jinmei.wei@spacemit.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=spacemit@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox