From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>, Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Enzo Matsumiya <ematsumiya@suse.de>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>,
Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>,
Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>, Bharath SM <bharathsm@microsoft.com>,
Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smb: client: hide unused cifs_debug_dirs_proc_ops
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:06:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202604300622.95X1Ab1U-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260423065042.1898971-1-arnd@kernel.org>
Hi Arnd,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on next-20260424]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v7.1-rc1]
[cannot apply to v7.0 v7.0-rc7 v7.0-rc6]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Arnd-Bergmann/smb-client-hide-unused-cifs_debug_dirs_proc_ops/20260426-163431
base: next-20260424
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260423065042.1898971-1-arnd%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH] smb: client: hide unused cifs_debug_dirs_proc_ops
config: microblaze-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260430/202604300622.95X1Ab1U-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: microblaze-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260430/202604300622.95X1Ab1U-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202604300622.95X1Ab1U-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
fs/smb/client/cifs_debug.c: In function 'cifs_proc_init':
>> fs/smb/client/cifs_debug.c:937:55: error: 'cifs_debug_dirs_proc_ops' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'cifs_debug_dirs_proc_show'?
937 | proc_create("open_dirs", 0600, proc_fs_cifs, &cifs_debug_dirs_proc_ops);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| cifs_debug_dirs_proc_show
fs/smb/client/cifs_debug.c:937:55: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
fs/smb/client/cifs_debug.c: At top level:
fs/smb/client/cifs_debug.c:298:12: warning: 'cifs_debug_dirs_proc_show' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
298 | static int cifs_debug_dirs_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +937 fs/smb/client/cifs_debug.c
^1da177e4c3f41 fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 922
^1da177e4c3f41 fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 923 void
^1da177e4c3f41 fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 924 cifs_proc_init(void)
^1da177e4c3f41 fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 925 {
36a5aeb8787fbf fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Alexey Dobriyan 2008-04-29 926 proc_fs_cifs = proc_mkdir("fs/cifs", NULL);
^1da177e4c3f41 fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 927 if (proc_fs_cifs == NULL)
^1da177e4c3f41 fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 928 return;
^1da177e4c3f41 fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 929
3f3942aca6da35 fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Christoph Hellwig 2018-05-15 930 proc_create_single("DebugData", 0, proc_fs_cifs,
3f3942aca6da35 fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Christoph Hellwig 2018-05-15 931 cifs_debug_data_proc_show);
^1da177e4c3f41 fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 932
dfe33f9abc0899 fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Steve French 2018-10-30 933 proc_create_single("open_files", 0400, proc_fs_cifs,
dfe33f9abc0899 fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Steve French 2018-10-30 934 cifs_debug_files_proc_show);
dfe33f9abc0899 fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Steve French 2018-10-30 935
17d912d54f2305 fs/smb/client/cifs_debug.c Enzo Matsumiya 2026-04-22 936 #ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG
17d912d54f2305 fs/smb/client/cifs_debug.c Enzo Matsumiya 2026-04-22 @937 proc_create("open_dirs", 0600, proc_fs_cifs, &cifs_debug_dirs_proc_ops);
17d912d54f2305 fs/smb/client/cifs_debug.c Enzo Matsumiya 2026-04-22 938 #else /* CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG */
17d912d54f2305 fs/smb/client/cifs_debug.c Enzo Matsumiya 2026-04-22 939 proc_create_single("open_dirs", 0400, proc_fs_cifs, cifs_debug_dirs_proc_show);
17d912d54f2305 fs/smb/client/cifs_debug.c Enzo Matsumiya 2026-04-22 940 #endif /* !CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG */
97a32539b9568b fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Alexey Dobriyan 2020-02-03 941 proc_create("Stats", 0644, proc_fs_cifs, &cifs_stats_proc_ops);
97a32539b9568b fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Alexey Dobriyan 2020-02-03 942 proc_create("cifsFYI", 0644, proc_fs_cifs, &cifsFYI_proc_ops);
97a32539b9568b fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Alexey Dobriyan 2020-02-03 943 proc_create("traceSMB", 0644, proc_fs_cifs, &traceSMB_proc_ops);
6539e7f3727ab9 fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Ronnie Sahlberg 2018-05-24 944 proc_create("LinuxExtensionsEnabled", 0644, proc_fs_cifs,
97a32539b9568b fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Alexey Dobriyan 2020-02-03 945 &cifs_linux_ext_proc_ops);
6539e7f3727ab9 fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Ronnie Sahlberg 2018-05-24 946 proc_create("SecurityFlags", 0644, proc_fs_cifs,
97a32539b9568b fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Alexey Dobriyan 2020-02-03 947 &cifs_security_flags_proc_ops);
6539e7f3727ab9 fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Ronnie Sahlberg 2018-05-24 948 proc_create("LookupCacheEnabled", 0644, proc_fs_cifs,
97a32539b9568b fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Alexey Dobriyan 2020-02-03 949 &cifs_lookup_cache_proc_ops);
54be1f6c1c3749 fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Paulo Alcantara 2018-11-14 950
94b0595a8e018c fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Aurelien Aptel 2021-03-18 951 proc_create("mount_params", 0444, proc_fs_cifs, &cifs_mount_params_proc_ops);
94b0595a8e018c fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c Aurelien Aptel 2021-03-18 952
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-29 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 6:50 [PATCH] smb: client: hide unused cifs_debug_dirs_proc_ops Arnd Bergmann
2026-04-23 9:01 ` Enzo Matsumiya
2026-04-29 20:37 ` kernel test robot
2026-04-29 23:06 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-04-30 12:11 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202604300622.95X1Ab1U-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=bharathsm@microsoft.com \
--cc=ematsumiya@suse.de \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=metze@samba.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pc@manguebit.org \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox