Re: [PATCH 00/11] mm/damon: introduce DAMOS failed region quota charge ratio

[SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>]

On Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:24:24 -0700 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:

> Hello Andrew,
> 
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:48:37 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:33:49 -0700 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > TL; DR: Let users set different DAMOS quota charge ratios for DAMOS
> > > action failed regions, for deterministic and consistent DAMOS action
> > > progress.
> > 
> > Add, thanks.
> > 
> > As mentioned provately, Sashiko claims to have found things which it
> > didn't see in the RFC.
> > 
> > 	https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260428013402.115171-1-sj@kernel.org
> 
> TL; DR: I find no blocker for this patch series from the Sashiko reviews.
> 
> Now sashiko replies its reviews for DAMON patches to authors and
> damon@lists.linux.dev.  So I replied [1,2,3] my review of the reviews to those
> on damon@lists.linux.dev mailing list.  As I mentioned on the TL;DR, I find no
> blocker for this series.
> 
> And I think you didn't see those because those are sent to only authors and
> damon@lists.linux.dev.
> 
> I nowadays reply-all to original recipients only if Sashiko found a blocker.  I
> will also add short notice for non-RFC patches if Sashiko found zero issue.

... Now I think the short notice is only redundant and silly, as the full
review is available on damon@ list and the one who primarily interested in
(Andrew) understands that.  I feel like the short-notice reply-all only
increase unnecessary traffic and my redundant typing.  I will not do the short
notice broadcasting, unless someone makes a diffeernt voice.


Thanks,
SJ

[...]