From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
"Qi Zheng" <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Shakeel Butt" <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
"Kairui Song" <kasong@tencent.com>,
"Barry Song" <baohua@kernel.org>,
"Axel Rasmussen" <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
"Yuanchu Xie" <yuanchu@google.com>, "Wei Xu" <weixugc@google.com>,
"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Carlos Santa" <carlos.santa@intel.com>,
"Christian Koenig" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Huang Rui" <ray.huang@amd.com>,
"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Daniel Colascione" <dancol@dancol.org>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] mm, drm/ttm, drm/xe: Avoid reclaim/eviction loops under fragmentation
Date: Fri, 1 May 2026 05:51:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260501055143.b60c31287051a56295f10205@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afRH+KUNw9zap4sp@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com>
On Thu, 30 Apr 2026 23:28:08 -0700 Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> wrote:
> > AI review flagged a few possible issues:
> > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260430191809.2142544-1-matthew.brost@intel.com
>
> Idk, who authors sashiko but what make it really nice if you could reply
> to it to talk things out.
It's a gemini 3 thing, based on prompts developed by Roman
Gushchin and Chris Mason and others. Google is making this available
to kernel developers at a non-trivial expense.
And yes, it would be great if Sashiko were able to learn from our
replies and to fine-tune its checking based on the human corrections.
I've asked for this a few times but didn't really understand the reply
;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-01 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 19:18 [PATCH v4 0/6] mm, drm/ttm, drm/xe: Avoid reclaim/eviction loops under fragmentation Matthew Brost
2026-04-30 19:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] mm: Wire up order in shrink_control Matthew Brost
2026-04-30 19:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] mm: Introduce zone_maybe_fragmented_in_shrinker() Matthew Brost
2026-05-01 0:50 ` Santa, Carlos
2026-05-01 19:08 ` PATCH v4 0/6] mm, drm/ttm, drm/xe: Avoid reclaim/eviction loops under fragmentation Kenneth Crudup
2026-05-01 20:00 ` Matthew Brost
2026-05-01 20:05 ` Kenneth Crudup
2026-05-01 21:10 ` Matthew Brost
2026-05-01 22:33 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-30 23:01 ` [PATCH " Andrew Morton
2026-05-01 6:28 ` Matthew Brost
2026-05-01 12:51 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-05-01 1:42 ` Dave Chinner
2026-05-01 7:09 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260501055143.b60c31287051a56295f10205@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=carlos.santa@intel.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dancol@dancol.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox