From: William Breathitt Gray <wbg@kernel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: William Breathitt Gray <wbg@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] isa: switch to dynamic root device
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 16:05:14 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260504070517.519372-1-wbg@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026050442-pleat-implant-e08b@gregkh>
On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 08:52:05AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 03:35:17PM +0900, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > On Sun, May 03, 2026 at 05:50:17PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > > On Sun May 3, 2026 at 7:08 AM CEST, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > > > Would you resend with a Fixes tag
> > >
> > > Devices should generally be allocated dynamically for various reasons (e.g. I
> > > recently had a case where adding a dynamic lock class key to struct device for
> > > debugging purposes caused warnings for all the static devices).
> > >
> > > While it clearly should be improved, I don't think this causes a bug in the ISA
> > > code -- there is no "real" leak as the device is static anyway and there's no
> > > spurious WARN() as release() is never hit, since ISA is always built-in.
> > >
> > > I'd assume this is why Johan did not add it in the first place.
> > >
> > > That said, if you mean to add a Fixes: tag anyway to indicate the technically
> > > wrong usage pattern of struct device, that seems reasonable to me.
> >
> > Okay that makes sense, this is improvement of the code rather than a
> > true bug fix, so we don't need a Fixes tag.
> >
> > Johan, I do have another request. Would you refactor the changes in
> > isa_bus_init() to avoid the nested blocks? For example:
> >
> > error = bus_register(&isa_bus_type);
> > if (error)
> > return error;
> >
> > isa_bus = root_device_register("isa");
> > if (IS_ERR(isa_bus)) {
> > bus_unregister(&isa_bus_type);
> > return PTR_ERR(isa_bus);
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > I believe that makes the logic easier to understand when reading the
> > code here.
>
> Nah, for now, it's fine, if you wish to touch this isa code in the
> future to "clean it up", that's great, but it should be done in a
> separate change.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Fair enough, this version is all right with me after all in the end.
Acked-by: William Breathitt Gray <wbg@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-04 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-24 10:24 [PATCH] isa: switch to dynamic root device Johan Hovold
2026-05-03 5:08 ` William Breathitt Gray
2026-05-03 15:50 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-04 6:35 ` William Breathitt Gray
2026-05-04 6:52 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-04 7:05 ` William Breathitt Gray [this message]
2026-05-04 20:32 ` Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260504070517.519372-1-wbg@kernel.org \
--to=wbg@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox