public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Denis Arzubov <denisarzubov8@gmail.com>
Cc: denisarzubov@gmail.com, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove extra blank line in rtw_btcoex_LPS_Leave()
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 16:54:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026050434-storm-hazily-7d9f@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260503215840.51342-1-denisarzubov8@gmail.com>

On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 12:58:40AM +0300, Denis Arzubov wrote:
> Remove unnecessary blank line after variable declaration in
> rtw_btcoex_LPS_Leave() function to improve code readability
> and comply with kernel coding style.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denis Arzubov <denisarzubov8@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_btcoex.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_btcoex.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_btcoex.c
> index 0191a943f..27dfd00b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_btcoex.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_btcoex.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ void rtw_btcoex_LPS_Leave(struct adapter *padapter)
>  {
>  	struct pwrctrl_priv *pwrpriv;
>  
> -
>  	pwrpriv = adapter_to_pwrctl(padapter);
>  
>  	if (pwrpriv->pwr_mode != PS_MODE_ACTIVE) {
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- Your patch did not apply to any known trees that Greg is in control
  of.  Possibly this is because you made it against Linus's tree, not
  the linux-next tree, which is where all of the development for the
  next version of the kernel is at.  Please refresh your patch against
  the linux-next tree, or even better yet, the development tree
  specified in the MAINTAINERS file for the subsystem you are submitting
  a patch for, and resend it.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-04 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-03 21:58 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove extra blank line in rtw_btcoex_LPS_Leave() Denis Arzubov
2026-05-04 14:54 ` Greg KH [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026050434-storm-hazily-7d9f@gregkh \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=denisarzubov8@gmail.com \
    --cc=denisarzubov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox