Re: [PATCH v4 5/6 RESEND] mfd: motorola-cpcap: diverge configuration per-board

The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* Re: [PATCH v4 5/6 RESEND] mfd: motorola-cpcap: diverge configuration per-board
       [not found] ` <20260428153611.142816-6-clamor95@gmail.com>
@ 2026-05-07 14:05   ` Lee Jones
  2026-05-07 14:33     ` Svyatoslav Ryhel
  2026-05-07 14:42     ` Svyatoslav Ryhel
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2026-05-07 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Svyatoslav Ryhel
  Cc: Dmitry Torokhov, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley,
	Pavel Machek, David Lechner, Tony Lindgren, linux-input,
	devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-leds

On Tue, 28 Apr 2026, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:

> MFD have rigid subdevice structure which does not allow flexible dynamic
> subdevice linking. Address this by diverging CPCAP subdevice composition
> to take into account board specific configuration.
> 
> Create a common default subdevice composition, rename existing subdevice
> composition into cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices since it targets mainly
> Mapphone board.
> 
> Removed st,6556002 as it is no longer applicable to all cases and
> duplicates motorola,cpcap, which is used as the default composition.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>
> ---

Changelog?

>  drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> index d8243b956f87..516d1e33affa 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
>  #include <linux/sysfs.h>
>  
> @@ -24,10 +25,16 @@
>  #define CPCAP_REGISTER_SIZE	4
>  #define CPCAP_REGISTER_BITS	16
>  
> +struct cpcap_chip_data {
> +	const struct mfd_cell *mfd_devices;
> +	unsigned int num_devices;
> +};

This is a red flag.

>  struct cpcap_ddata {
>  	struct spi_device *spi;
>  	struct regmap_irq *irqs;
>  	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irqdata[CPCAP_NR_IRQ_CHIPS];
> +	const struct cpcap_chip_data *cdata;
>  	const struct regmap_config *regmap_conf;
>  	struct regmap *regmap;
>  };
> @@ -195,20 +202,6 @@ static int cpcap_init_irq(struct cpcap_ddata *cpcap)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static const struct of_device_id cpcap_of_match[] = {
> -	{ .compatible = "motorola,cpcap", },
> -	{ .compatible = "st,6556002", },
> -	{},
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cpcap_of_match);
> -
> -static const struct spi_device_id cpcap_spi_ids[] = {
> -	{ .name = "cpcap", },
> -	{ .name = "6556002", },
> -	{},
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, cpcap_spi_ids);
> -
>  static const struct regmap_config cpcap_regmap_config = {
>  	.reg_bits = 16,
>  	.reg_stride = 4,
> @@ -241,7 +234,56 @@ static int cpcap_resume(struct device *dev)
>  
>  static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(cpcap_pm, cpcap_suspend, cpcap_resume);
>  
> -static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mfd_devices[] = {
> +static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_default_mfd_devices[] = {
> +	{
> +		.name          = "cpcap_adc",
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-adc",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap_battery",
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-battery",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-regulator",
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-regulator",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-rtc",
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-rtc",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-pwrbutton",
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-usb-phy",
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-usb-phy",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-led",
> +		.id            = 0,
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-red",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-led",
> +		.id            = 1,
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-green",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-led",
> +		.id            = 2,
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-blue",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-led",
> +		.id            = 3,
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-adl",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-led",
> +		.id            = 4,
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-cp",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-codec",
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static const struct cpcap_chip_data cpcap_default_data = {
> +	.mfd_devices = cpcap_default_mfd_devices,
> +	.num_devices = ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_default_mfd_devices),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices[] = {
>  	{
>  		.name          = "cpcap_adc",
>  		.of_compatible = "motorola,mapphone-cpcap-adc",
> @@ -285,7 +327,12 @@ static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mfd_devices[] = {
>  		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-cp",
>  	}, {
>  		.name          = "cpcap-codec",
> -	}
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static const struct cpcap_chip_data cpcap_mapphone_data = {
> +	.mfd_devices = cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices,
> +	.num_devices = ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices),
>  };
>  
>  static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> @@ -297,9 +344,17 @@ static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  	if (!cpcap)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	cpcap->cdata = device_get_match_data(&spi->dev);
> +	if (!cpcap->cdata)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	cpcap->spi = spi;
>  	spi_set_drvdata(spi, cpcap);
>  
> @@ -331,16 +382,24 @@ static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  	spi->dev.coherent_dma_mask = 0;
>  	spi->dev.dma_mask = &spi->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
>  
> -	return devm_mfd_add_devices(&spi->dev, 0, cpcap_mfd_devices,
> -				    ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_mfd_devices), NULL, 0, NULL);
> +	return devm_mfd_add_devices(&spi->dev, 0, cpcap->cdata->mfd_devices,
> +				    cpcap->cdata->num_devices, NULL, 0, NULL);
>  }
>  
> +static const struct of_device_id cpcap_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "motorola,cpcap", .data = &cpcap_default_data },
> +	{ .compatible = "motorola,mapphone-cpcap", .data = &cpcap_mapphone_data	},

We don't allow data from one device registration API (MFD) to be passed
through another (OF) because it tends to lead to all sorts of "creative
solutions".  Pass a value instead and match on that in a switch()
statement like all of the other MFD drivers do.

> +	{ /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cpcap_of_match);
> +
> +static const struct spi_device_id cpcap_spi_ids[] = {
> +	{ .name = "cpcap", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&cpcap_default_data },
> +	{ .name = "mapphone-cpcap", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&cpcap_mapphone_data },
> +	{ /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, cpcap_spi_ids);
> +
>  static struct spi_driver cpcap_driver = {
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name = "cpcap-core",
> -- 
> 2.51.0
> 
> 

-- 
Lee Jones

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 5/6 RESEND] mfd: motorola-cpcap: diverge configuration per-board
  2026-05-07 14:05   ` [PATCH v4 5/6 RESEND] mfd: motorola-cpcap: diverge configuration per-board Lee Jones
@ 2026-05-07 14:33     ` Svyatoslav Ryhel
  2026-05-13 14:05       ` Lee Jones
  2026-05-07 14:42     ` Svyatoslav Ryhel
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Svyatoslav Ryhel @ 2026-05-07 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones
  Cc: Dmitry Torokhov, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley,
	Pavel Machek, David Lechner, Tony Lindgren, linux-input,
	devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-leds

чт, 7 трав. 2026 р. о 17:05 Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> пише:
>
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2026, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>
> > MFD have rigid subdevice structure which does not allow flexible dynamic
> > subdevice linking. Address this by diverging CPCAP subdevice composition
> > to take into account board specific configuration.
> >
> > Create a common default subdevice composition, rename existing subdevice
> > composition into cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices since it targets mainly
> > Mapphone board.
> >
> > Removed st,6556002 as it is no longer applicable to all cases and
> > duplicates motorola,cpcap, which is used as the default composition.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>
> > ---
>
> Changelog?
>

Changelog is in the cover.

> >  drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > index d8243b956f87..516d1e33affa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> > +#include <linux/property.h>
> >  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> >  #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> >
> > @@ -24,10 +25,16 @@
> >  #define CPCAP_REGISTER_SIZE  4
> >  #define CPCAP_REGISTER_BITS  16
> >
> > +struct cpcap_chip_data {
> > +     const struct mfd_cell *mfd_devices;
> > +     unsigned int num_devices;
> > +};
>
> This is a red flag.
>
> >  struct cpcap_ddata {
> >       struct spi_device *spi;
> >       struct regmap_irq *irqs;
> >       struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irqdata[CPCAP_NR_IRQ_CHIPS];
> > +     const struct cpcap_chip_data *cdata;
> >       const struct regmap_config *regmap_conf;
> >       struct regmap *regmap;
> >  };
> > @@ -195,20 +202,6 @@ static int cpcap_init_irq(struct cpcap_ddata *cpcap)
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -static const struct of_device_id cpcap_of_match[] = {
> > -     { .compatible = "motorola,cpcap", },
> > -     { .compatible = "st,6556002", },
> > -     {},
> > -};
> > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cpcap_of_match);
> > -
> > -static const struct spi_device_id cpcap_spi_ids[] = {
> > -     { .name = "cpcap", },
> > -     { .name = "6556002", },
> > -     {},
> > -};
> > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, cpcap_spi_ids);
> > -
> >  static const struct regmap_config cpcap_regmap_config = {
> >       .reg_bits = 16,
> >       .reg_stride = 4,
> > @@ -241,7 +234,56 @@ static int cpcap_resume(struct device *dev)
> >
> >  static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(cpcap_pm, cpcap_suspend, cpcap_resume);
> >
> > -static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mfd_devices[] = {
> > +static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_default_mfd_devices[] = {
> > +     {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap_adc",
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-adc",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap_battery",
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-battery",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-regulator",
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-regulator",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-rtc",
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-rtc",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-pwrbutton",
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-usb-phy",
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-usb-phy",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > +             .id            = 0,
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-red",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > +             .id            = 1,
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-green",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > +             .id            = 2,
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-blue",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > +             .id            = 3,
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-adl",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > +             .id            = 4,
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-cp",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-codec",
> > +     },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct cpcap_chip_data cpcap_default_data = {
> > +     .mfd_devices = cpcap_default_mfd_devices,
> > +     .num_devices = ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_default_mfd_devices),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices[] = {
> >       {
> >               .name          = "cpcap_adc",
> >               .of_compatible = "motorola,mapphone-cpcap-adc",
> > @@ -285,7 +327,12 @@ static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mfd_devices[] = {
> >               .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-cp",
> >       }, {
> >               .name          = "cpcap-codec",
> > -     }
> > +     },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct cpcap_chip_data cpcap_mapphone_data = {
> > +     .mfd_devices = cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices,
> > +     .num_devices = ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices),
> >  };
> >
> >  static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > @@ -297,9 +344,17 @@ static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> >       if (!cpcap)
> >               return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > +     cpcap->cdata = device_get_match_data(&spi->dev);
> > +     if (!cpcap->cdata)
> > +             return -ENODEV;
> > +
> >       cpcap->spi = spi;
> >       spi_set_drvdata(spi, cpcap);
> >
> > @@ -331,16 +382,24 @@ static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> >       spi->dev.coherent_dma_mask = 0;
> >       spi->dev.dma_mask = &spi->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
> >
> > -     return devm_mfd_add_devices(&spi->dev, 0, cpcap_mfd_devices,
> > -                                 ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_mfd_devices), NULL, 0, NULL);
> > +     return devm_mfd_add_devices(&spi->dev, 0, cpcap->cdata->mfd_devices,
> > +                                 cpcap->cdata->num_devices, NULL, 0, NULL);
> >  }
> >
> > +static const struct of_device_id cpcap_of_match[] = {
> > +     { .compatible = "motorola,cpcap", .data = &cpcap_default_data },
> > +     { .compatible = "motorola,mapphone-cpcap", .data = &cpcap_mapphone_data },
>
> We don't allow data from one device registration API (MFD) to be passed
> through another (OF) because it tends to lead to all sorts of "creative
> solutions".  Pass a value instead and match on that in a switch()
> statement like all of the other MFD drivers do.
>

You don't allow this. I have not seen this enforced anywhere in the
kernel except the mfd subsystem. Fine, does not matter, if this makes
you happy I will adjust.

> > +     { /* sentinel */ }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cpcap_of_match);
> > +
> > +static const struct spi_device_id cpcap_spi_ids[] = {
> > +     { .name = "cpcap", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&cpcap_default_data },
> > +     { .name = "mapphone-cpcap", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&cpcap_mapphone_data },
> > +     { /* sentinel */ }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, cpcap_spi_ids);
> > +
> >  static struct spi_driver cpcap_driver = {
> >       .driver = {
> >               .name = "cpcap-core",
> > --
> > 2.51.0
> >
> >
>
> --
> Lee Jones

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 5/6 RESEND] mfd: motorola-cpcap: diverge configuration per-board
  2026-05-07 14:33     ` Svyatoslav Ryhel
@ 2026-05-13 14:05       ` Lee Jones
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2026-05-13 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Svyatoslav Ryhel
  Cc: Dmitry Torokhov, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley,
	Pavel Machek, David Lechner, Tony Lindgren, linux-input,
	devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-leds

On Thu, 07 May 2026, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:

> чт, 7 трав. 2026 р. о 17:05 Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> пише:
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Apr 2026, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> >
> > > MFD have rigid subdevice structure which does not allow flexible dynamic
> > > subdevice linking. Address this by diverging CPCAP subdevice composition
> > > to take into account board specific configuration.
> > >
> > > Create a common default subdevice composition, rename existing subdevice
> > > composition into cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices since it targets mainly
> > > Mapphone board.
> > >
> > > Removed st,6556002 as it is no longer applicable to all cases and
> > > duplicates motorola,cpcap, which is used as the default composition.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Changelog?
> >
> 
> Changelog is in the cover.
> 
> > >  drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > >  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > > index d8243b956f87..516d1e33affa 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > >  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> > > +#include <linux/property.h>
> > >  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > >  #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> > >
> > > @@ -24,10 +25,16 @@
> > >  #define CPCAP_REGISTER_SIZE  4
> > >  #define CPCAP_REGISTER_BITS  16
> > >
> > > +struct cpcap_chip_data {
> > > +     const struct mfd_cell *mfd_devices;
> > > +     unsigned int num_devices;
> > > +};
> >
> > This is a red flag.
> >
> > >  struct cpcap_ddata {
> > >       struct spi_device *spi;
> > >       struct regmap_irq *irqs;
> > >       struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irqdata[CPCAP_NR_IRQ_CHIPS];
> > > +     const struct cpcap_chip_data *cdata;
> > >       const struct regmap_config *regmap_conf;
> > >       struct regmap *regmap;
> > >  };
> > > @@ -195,20 +202,6 @@ static int cpcap_init_irq(struct cpcap_ddata *cpcap)
> > >       return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static const struct of_device_id cpcap_of_match[] = {
> > > -     { .compatible = "motorola,cpcap", },
> > > -     { .compatible = "st,6556002", },
> > > -     {},
> > > -};
> > > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cpcap_of_match);
> > > -
> > > -static const struct spi_device_id cpcap_spi_ids[] = {
> > > -     { .name = "cpcap", },
> > > -     { .name = "6556002", },
> > > -     {},
> > > -};
> > > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, cpcap_spi_ids);
> > > -
> > >  static const struct regmap_config cpcap_regmap_config = {
> > >       .reg_bits = 16,
> > >       .reg_stride = 4,
> > > @@ -241,7 +234,56 @@ static int cpcap_resume(struct device *dev)
> > >
> > >  static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(cpcap_pm, cpcap_suspend, cpcap_resume);
> > >
> > > -static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mfd_devices[] = {
> > > +static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_default_mfd_devices[] = {
> > > +     {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap_adc",
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-adc",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap_battery",
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-battery",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-regulator",
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-regulator",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-rtc",
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-rtc",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-pwrbutton",
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-usb-phy",
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-usb-phy",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > > +             .id            = 0,
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-red",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > > +             .id            = 1,
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-green",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > > +             .id            = 2,
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-blue",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > > +             .id            = 3,
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-adl",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > > +             .id            = 4,
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-cp",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-codec",
> > > +     },
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct cpcap_chip_data cpcap_default_data = {
> > > +     .mfd_devices = cpcap_default_mfd_devices,
> > > +     .num_devices = ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_default_mfd_devices),
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices[] = {
> > >       {
> > >               .name          = "cpcap_adc",
> > >               .of_compatible = "motorola,mapphone-cpcap-adc",
> > > @@ -285,7 +327,12 @@ static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mfd_devices[] = {
> > >               .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-cp",
> > >       }, {
> > >               .name          = "cpcap-codec",
> > > -     }
> > > +     },
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct cpcap_chip_data cpcap_mapphone_data = {
> > > +     .mfd_devices = cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices,
> > > +     .num_devices = ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices),
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > > @@ -297,9 +344,17 @@ static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > >       if (!cpcap)
> > >               return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > +     cpcap->cdata = device_get_match_data(&spi->dev);
> > > +     if (!cpcap->cdata)
> > > +             return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > >       cpcap->spi = spi;
> > >       spi_set_drvdata(spi, cpcap);
> > >
> > > @@ -331,16 +382,24 @@ static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > >       spi->dev.coherent_dma_mask = 0;
> > >       spi->dev.dma_mask = &spi->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
> > >
> > > -     return devm_mfd_add_devices(&spi->dev, 0, cpcap_mfd_devices,
> > > -                                 ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_mfd_devices), NULL, 0, NULL);
> > > +     return devm_mfd_add_devices(&spi->dev, 0, cpcap->cdata->mfd_devices,
> > > +                                 cpcap->cdata->num_devices, NULL, 0, NULL);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static const struct of_device_id cpcap_of_match[] = {
> > > +     { .compatible = "motorola,cpcap", .data = &cpcap_default_data },
> > > +     { .compatible = "motorola,mapphone-cpcap", .data = &cpcap_mapphone_data },
> >
> > We don't allow data from one device registration API (MFD) to be passed
> > through another (OF) because it tends to lead to all sorts of "creative
> > solutions".  Pass a value instead and match on that in a switch()
> > statement like all of the other MFD drivers do.
> >
> 
> You don't allow this. I have not seen this enforced anywhere in the
> kernel except the mfd subsystem. Fine, does not matter, if this makes
> you happy I will adjust.

Where else would this rule be applicable?  I can't think of anywhere.

-- 
Lee Jones

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 5/6 RESEND] mfd: motorola-cpcap: diverge configuration per-board
  2026-05-07 14:05   ` [PATCH v4 5/6 RESEND] mfd: motorola-cpcap: diverge configuration per-board Lee Jones
  2026-05-07 14:33     ` Svyatoslav Ryhel
@ 2026-05-07 14:42     ` Svyatoslav Ryhel
  2026-05-13 14:04       ` Lee Jones
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Svyatoslav Ryhel @ 2026-05-07 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones
  Cc: Dmitry Torokhov, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley,
	Pavel Machek, David Lechner, Tony Lindgren, linux-input,
	devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-leds

чт, 7 трав. 2026 р. о 17:05 Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> пише:
>
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2026, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>
> > MFD have rigid subdevice structure which does not allow flexible dynamic
> > subdevice linking. Address this by diverging CPCAP subdevice composition
> > to take into account board specific configuration.
> >
> > Create a common default subdevice composition, rename existing subdevice
> > composition into cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices since it targets mainly
> > Mapphone board.
> >
> > Removed st,6556002 as it is no longer applicable to all cases and
> > duplicates motorola,cpcap, which is used as the default composition.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>
> > ---
>
> Changelog?
>
> >  drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > index d8243b956f87..516d1e33affa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> > +#include <linux/property.h>
> >  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> >  #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> >
> > @@ -24,10 +25,16 @@
> >  #define CPCAP_REGISTER_SIZE  4
> >  #define CPCAP_REGISTER_BITS  16
> >
> > +struct cpcap_chip_data {
> > +     const struct mfd_cell *mfd_devices;
> > +     unsigned int num_devices;
> > +};
>
> This is a red flag.
>
> >  struct cpcap_ddata {
> >       struct spi_device *spi;
> >       struct regmap_irq *irqs;
> >       struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irqdata[CPCAP_NR_IRQ_CHIPS];
> > +     const struct cpcap_chip_data *cdata;
> >       const struct regmap_config *regmap_conf;
> >       struct regmap *regmap;
> >  };
> > @@ -195,20 +202,6 @@ static int cpcap_init_irq(struct cpcap_ddata *cpcap)
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -static const struct of_device_id cpcap_of_match[] = {
> > -     { .compatible = "motorola,cpcap", },
> > -     { .compatible = "st,6556002", },
> > -     {},
> > -};
> > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cpcap_of_match);
> > -
> > -static const struct spi_device_id cpcap_spi_ids[] = {
> > -     { .name = "cpcap", },
> > -     { .name = "6556002", },
> > -     {},
> > -};
> > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, cpcap_spi_ids);
> > -
> >  static const struct regmap_config cpcap_regmap_config = {
> >       .reg_bits = 16,
> >       .reg_stride = 4,
> > @@ -241,7 +234,56 @@ static int cpcap_resume(struct device *dev)
> >
> >  static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(cpcap_pm, cpcap_suspend, cpcap_resume);
> >
> > -static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mfd_devices[] = {
> > +static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_default_mfd_devices[] = {
> > +     {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap_adc",
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-adc",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap_battery",
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-battery",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-regulator",
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-regulator",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-rtc",
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-rtc",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-pwrbutton",
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-usb-phy",
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-usb-phy",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > +             .id            = 0,
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-red",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > +             .id            = 1,
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-green",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > +             .id            = 2,
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-blue",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > +             .id            = 3,
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-adl",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > +             .id            = 4,
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-cp",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-codec",
> > +     },
> > +};

Lee, would you mind if I convert these mfd_cell structures to use
macros in this commit since I am refactoring them anyway?

> > +
> > +static const struct cpcap_chip_data cpcap_default_data = {
> > +     .mfd_devices = cpcap_default_mfd_devices,
> > +     .num_devices = ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_default_mfd_devices),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices[] = {
> >       {
> >               .name          = "cpcap_adc",
> >               .of_compatible = "motorola,mapphone-cpcap-adc",
> > @@ -285,7 +327,12 @@ static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mfd_devices[] = {
> >               .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-cp",
> >       }, {
> >               .name          = "cpcap-codec",
> > -     }
> > +     },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct cpcap_chip_data cpcap_mapphone_data = {
> > +     .mfd_devices = cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices,
> > +     .num_devices = ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices),
> >  };
> >
> >  static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > @@ -297,9 +344,17 @@ static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> >       if (!cpcap)
> >               return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > +     cpcap->cdata = device_get_match_data(&spi->dev);
> > +     if (!cpcap->cdata)
> > +             return -ENODEV;
> > +
> >       cpcap->spi = spi;
> >       spi_set_drvdata(spi, cpcap);
> >
> > @@ -331,16 +382,24 @@ static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> >       spi->dev.coherent_dma_mask = 0;
> >       spi->dev.dma_mask = &spi->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
> >
> > -     return devm_mfd_add_devices(&spi->dev, 0, cpcap_mfd_devices,
> > -                                 ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_mfd_devices), NULL, 0, NULL);
> > +     return devm_mfd_add_devices(&spi->dev, 0, cpcap->cdata->mfd_devices,
> > +                                 cpcap->cdata->num_devices, NULL, 0, NULL);
> >  }
> >
> > +static const struct of_device_id cpcap_of_match[] = {
> > +     { .compatible = "motorola,cpcap", .data = &cpcap_default_data },
> > +     { .compatible = "motorola,mapphone-cpcap", .data = &cpcap_mapphone_data },
>
> We don't allow data from one device registration API (MFD) to be passed
> through another (OF) because it tends to lead to all sorts of "creative
> solutions".  Pass a value instead and match on that in a switch()
> statement like all of the other MFD drivers do.
>
> > +     { /* sentinel */ }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cpcap_of_match);
> > +
> > +static const struct spi_device_id cpcap_spi_ids[] = {
> > +     { .name = "cpcap", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&cpcap_default_data },
> > +     { .name = "mapphone-cpcap", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&cpcap_mapphone_data },
> > +     { /* sentinel */ }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, cpcap_spi_ids);
> > +
> >  static struct spi_driver cpcap_driver = {
> >       .driver = {
> >               .name = "cpcap-core",
> > --
> > 2.51.0
> >
> >
>
> --
> Lee Jones

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 5/6 RESEND] mfd: motorola-cpcap: diverge configuration per-board
  2026-05-07 14:42     ` Svyatoslav Ryhel
@ 2026-05-13 14:04       ` Lee Jones
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2026-05-13 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Svyatoslav Ryhel
  Cc: Dmitry Torokhov, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley,
	Pavel Machek, David Lechner, Tony Lindgren, linux-input,
	devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-leds

On Thu, 07 May 2026, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:

> чт, 7 трав. 2026 р. о 17:05 Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> пише:
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Apr 2026, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> >
> > > MFD have rigid subdevice structure which does not allow flexible dynamic
> > > subdevice linking. Address this by diverging CPCAP subdevice composition
> > > to take into account board specific configuration.
> > >
> > > Create a common default subdevice composition, rename existing subdevice
> > > composition into cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices since it targets mainly
> > > Mapphone board.
> > >
> > > Removed st,6556002 as it is no longer applicable to all cases and
> > > duplicates motorola,cpcap, which is used as the default composition.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Changelog?
> >
> > >  drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > >  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > > index d8243b956f87..516d1e33affa 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > >  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> > > +#include <linux/property.h>
> > >  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > >  #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> > >
> > > @@ -24,10 +25,16 @@
> > >  #define CPCAP_REGISTER_SIZE  4
> > >  #define CPCAP_REGISTER_BITS  16
> > >
> > > +struct cpcap_chip_data {
> > > +     const struct mfd_cell *mfd_devices;
> > > +     unsigned int num_devices;
> > > +};
> >
> > This is a red flag.
> >
> > >  struct cpcap_ddata {
> > >       struct spi_device *spi;
> > >       struct regmap_irq *irqs;
> > >       struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irqdata[CPCAP_NR_IRQ_CHIPS];
> > > +     const struct cpcap_chip_data *cdata;
> > >       const struct regmap_config *regmap_conf;
> > >       struct regmap *regmap;
> > >  };
> > > @@ -195,20 +202,6 @@ static int cpcap_init_irq(struct cpcap_ddata *cpcap)
> > >       return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static const struct of_device_id cpcap_of_match[] = {
> > > -     { .compatible = "motorola,cpcap", },
> > > -     { .compatible = "st,6556002", },
> > > -     {},
> > > -};
> > > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cpcap_of_match);
> > > -
> > > -static const struct spi_device_id cpcap_spi_ids[] = {
> > > -     { .name = "cpcap", },
> > > -     { .name = "6556002", },
> > > -     {},
> > > -};
> > > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, cpcap_spi_ids);
> > > -
> > >  static const struct regmap_config cpcap_regmap_config = {
> > >       .reg_bits = 16,
> > >       .reg_stride = 4,
> > > @@ -241,7 +234,56 @@ static int cpcap_resume(struct device *dev)
> > >
> > >  static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(cpcap_pm, cpcap_suspend, cpcap_resume);
> > >
> > > -static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mfd_devices[] = {
> > > +static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_default_mfd_devices[] = {
> > > +     {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap_adc",
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-adc",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap_battery",
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-battery",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-regulator",
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-regulator",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-rtc",
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-rtc",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-pwrbutton",
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-usb-phy",
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-usb-phy",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > > +             .id            = 0,
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-red",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > > +             .id            = 1,
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-green",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > > +             .id            = 2,
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-blue",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > > +             .id            = 3,
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-adl",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > > +             .id            = 4,
> > > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-cp",
> > > +     }, {
> > > +             .name          = "cpcap-codec",
> > > +     },
> > > +};
> 
> Lee, would you mind if I convert these mfd_cell structures to use
> macros in this commit since I am refactoring them anyway?

Sure.

-- 
Lee Jones

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

[parent not found: <20260428153611.142816-7-clamor95@gmail.com>]

* Re: [PATCH v4 6/6 RESEND] mfd: motorola-cpcap: add support for Mot CPCAP composition
       [not found] ` <20260428153611.142816-7-clamor95@gmail.com>
@ 2026-05-07 14:07   ` Lee Jones
  2026-05-07 14:36     ` Svyatoslav Ryhel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2026-05-07 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Svyatoslav Ryhel
  Cc: Dmitry Torokhov, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley,
	Pavel Machek, David Lechner, Tony Lindgren, linux-input,
	devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-leds

On Tue, 28 Apr 2026, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:

> Add a MFD subdevice composition used in Tegra20 based Mot board
> (Motorola Atrix 4G and Droid X2).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> index 516d1e33affa..fdec92f5c6b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> @@ -335,6 +335,54 @@ static const struct cpcap_chip_data cpcap_mapphone_data = {
>  	.num_devices = ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices),
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * The Mot board features a USB-PHY and charger similar to the ones in
> + * Mapphone; however, because Mot is based on Tegra20, it is incompatible
> + * with the existing implementation, which is tightly interconnected with
> + * the OMAP USB PHY.
> + */
> +static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mot_mfd_devices[] = {
> +	{
> +		.name          = "cpcap_adc",
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,mot-cpcap-adc",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap_battery",
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-battery",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-regulator",
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,mot-cpcap-regulator",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-rtc",
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-rtc",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-pwrbutton",
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-led",
> +		.id            = 0,
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-red",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-led",
> +		.id            = 1,
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-green",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-led",
> +		.id            = 2,
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-blue",
> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-led",
> +		.id            = 3,
> +		.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-adl",

MFD_CELL_OF() for all.

> +	}, {
> +		.name          = "cpcap-codec",
> +	},

MFD_CELL_NAME()

> +};
> +
> +static const struct cpcap_chip_data cpcap_mot_data = {
> +	.mfd_devices = cpcap_mot_mfd_devices,
> +	.num_devices = ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_mot_mfd_devices),
> +};
> +
>  static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  {
>  	struct cpcap_ddata *cpcap;
> @@ -389,6 +437,7 @@ static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  static const struct of_device_id cpcap_of_match[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "motorola,cpcap", .data = &cpcap_default_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "motorola,mapphone-cpcap", .data = &cpcap_mapphone_data	},
> +	{ .compatible = "motorola,mot-cpcap", .data = &cpcap_mot_data },
>  	{ /* sentinel */ }
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cpcap_of_match);
> @@ -396,6 +445,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cpcap_of_match);
>  static const struct spi_device_id cpcap_spi_ids[] = {
>  	{ .name = "cpcap", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&cpcap_default_data },
>  	{ .name = "mapphone-cpcap", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&cpcap_mapphone_data },
> +	{ .name = "mot-cpcap", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&cpcap_mot_data },
>  	{ /* sentinel */ }
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, cpcap_spi_ids);
> -- 
> 2.51.0
> 

-- 
Lee Jones

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 6/6 RESEND] mfd: motorola-cpcap: add support for Mot CPCAP composition
  2026-05-07 14:07   ` [PATCH v4 6/6 RESEND] mfd: motorola-cpcap: add support for Mot CPCAP composition Lee Jones
@ 2026-05-07 14:36     ` Svyatoslav Ryhel
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Svyatoslav Ryhel @ 2026-05-07 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones
  Cc: Dmitry Torokhov, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley,
	Pavel Machek, David Lechner, Tony Lindgren, linux-input,
	devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-leds

чт, 7 трав. 2026 р. о 17:07 Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> пише:
>
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2026, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>
> > Add a MFD subdevice composition used in Tegra20 based Mot board
> > (Motorola Atrix 4G and Droid X2).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > index 516d1e33affa..fdec92f5c6b0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > @@ -335,6 +335,54 @@ static const struct cpcap_chip_data cpcap_mapphone_data = {
> >       .num_devices = ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices),
> >  };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * The Mot board features a USB-PHY and charger similar to the ones in
> > + * Mapphone; however, because Mot is based on Tegra20, it is incompatible
> > + * with the existing implementation, which is tightly interconnected with
> > + * the OMAP USB PHY.
> > + */
> > +static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mot_mfd_devices[] = {
> > +     {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap_adc",
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,mot-cpcap-adc",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap_battery",
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-battery",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-regulator",
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,mot-cpcap-regulator",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-rtc",
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-rtc",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-pwrbutton",
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > +             .id            = 0,
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-red",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > +             .id            = 1,
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-green",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > +             .id            = 2,
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-blue",
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-led",
> > +             .id            = 3,
> > +             .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-adl",
>
> MFD_CELL_OF() for all.
>
> > +     }, {
> > +             .name          = "cpcap-codec",
> > +     },
>
> MFD_CELL_NAME()
>

I was not aware these macros exist. Thank you for pointing to them.

> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct cpcap_chip_data cpcap_mot_data = {
> > +     .mfd_devices = cpcap_mot_mfd_devices,
> > +     .num_devices = ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_mot_mfd_devices),
> > +};
> > +
> >  static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> >  {
> >       struct cpcap_ddata *cpcap;
> > @@ -389,6 +437,7 @@ static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> >  static const struct of_device_id cpcap_of_match[] = {
> >       { .compatible = "motorola,cpcap", .data = &cpcap_default_data },
> >       { .compatible = "motorola,mapphone-cpcap", .data = &cpcap_mapphone_data },
> > +     { .compatible = "motorola,mot-cpcap", .data = &cpcap_mot_data },
> >       { /* sentinel */ }
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cpcap_of_match);
> > @@ -396,6 +445,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cpcap_of_match);
> >  static const struct spi_device_id cpcap_spi_ids[] = {
> >       { .name = "cpcap", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&cpcap_default_data },
> >       { .name = "mapphone-cpcap", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&cpcap_mapphone_data },
> > +     { .name = "mot-cpcap", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&cpcap_mot_data },
> >       { /* sentinel */ }
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, cpcap_spi_ids);
> > --
> > 2.51.0
> >
>
> --
> Lee Jones

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-13 14:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20260428153611.142816-1-clamor95@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <20260428153611.142816-6-clamor95@gmail.com>
2026-05-07 14:05   ` [PATCH v4 5/6 RESEND] mfd: motorola-cpcap: diverge configuration per-board Lee Jones
2026-05-07 14:33     ` Svyatoslav Ryhel
2026-05-13 14:05       ` Lee Jones
2026-05-07 14:42     ` Svyatoslav Ryhel
2026-05-13 14:04       ` Lee Jones
     [not found] ` <20260428153611.142816-7-clamor95@gmail.com>
2026-05-07 14:07   ` [PATCH v4 6/6 RESEND] mfd: motorola-cpcap: add support for Mot CPCAP composition Lee Jones
2026-05-07 14:36     ` Svyatoslav Ryhel

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox