The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] scsi: scsi_transport_srp: Move long delayed work on system_dfl_long_wq
Date: Thu,  7 May 2026 16:34:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260507143410.337267-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)

Currently the code enqueue work items using {queue|mod}_delayed_work(),
using system_long_wq. This workqueue should be used when long works are
expected and it is a per-cpu workqueue.

The function(s) end up calling __queue_delayed_work(), which set a global
timer that could fire anywhere, enqueuing the work where the timer fired.

Unbound works could benefit from scheduler task placement, to optimize
performance and power consumption. Long work shouldn't stick to a single
CPU.

Recently, a new unbound workqueue specific for long running work has
been added:

    c116737e972e ("workqueue: Add system_dfl_long_wq for long unbound works")

Since the workqueue work doesn't rely on per-cpu variables, there is no
obvious reason that justify the use of a per-cpu workqueue. So change
system_long_wq with system_dfl_long_wq so that the work may benefit from
scheduler task placement.

Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c
index d71ab5fdb758..a61cbb079ab4 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static ssize_t store_reconnect_delay(struct device *dev,
 
 	if (rport->reconnect_delay <= 0 && delay > 0 &&
 	    rport->state != SRP_RPORT_RUNNING) {
-		queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &rport->reconnect_work,
+		queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_long_wq, &rport->reconnect_work,
 				   delay * HZ);
 	} else if (delay <= 0) {
 		cancel_delayed_work(&rport->reconnect_work);
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static void srp_reconnect_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		delay = rport->reconnect_delay *
 			clamp(rport->failed_reconnects - 10, 1, 100);
 		if (delay > 0)
-			queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq,
+			queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_long_wq,
 					   &rport->reconnect_work, delay * HZ);
 	}
 }
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ static void __srp_start_tl_fail_timers(struct srp_rport *rport)
 	if (rport->state == SRP_RPORT_LOST)
 		return;
 	if (delay > 0)
-		queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &rport->reconnect_work,
+		queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_long_wq, &rport->reconnect_work,
 				   1UL * delay * HZ);
 	if ((fast_io_fail_tmo >= 0 || dev_loss_tmo >= 0) &&
 	    srp_rport_set_state(rport, SRP_RPORT_BLOCKED) == 0) {
@@ -482,11 +482,11 @@ static void __srp_start_tl_fail_timers(struct srp_rport *rport)
 			 rport->state);
 		scsi_block_targets(shost, &shost->shost_gendev);
 		if (fast_io_fail_tmo >= 0)
-			queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq,
+			queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_long_wq,
 					   &rport->fast_io_fail_work,
 					   1UL * fast_io_fail_tmo * HZ);
 		if (dev_loss_tmo >= 0)
-			queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq,
+			queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_long_wq,
 					   &rport->dev_loss_work,
 					   1UL * dev_loss_tmo * HZ);
 	}
-- 
2.53.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-05-07 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-07 14:34 Marco Crivellari [this message]
2026-05-08 16:11 ` [RFC PATCH] scsi: scsi_transport_srp: Move long delayed work on system_dfl_long_wq Bart Van Assche
2026-05-09 13:30   ` Marco Crivellari
2026-05-11 20:26 ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260507143410.337267-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox